Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Paper

Pacemaker implantation after TAVI: predictors of AV block persistence

Authors: Luise Gaede, Won-Keun Kim, Christoph Liebetrau, Oliver Dörr, Johannes Sperzel, Johannes Blumenstein, Alexander Berkowitsch, Thomas Walther, Christian Hamm, Albrecht Elsässer, Holger Nef, Helge Möllmann

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

Approximately every fifth patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) requires a permanent pacemaker (PPM) after the procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse predictors of atrioventricular block III° (AVBIII) persistence with concurrent PPM dependency after TAVI.

Methods and results

Between 2010 and 2015 a total of 1198 patients underwent TAVI at the Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Germany. After exclusion of patients with prior PPM (n = 173) 14.7% (n = 176) of the patients underwent PPM implantation after the procedure. Independent predictors of PPM implantation were pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB, p < 0.001) and implantation of a CoreValve prosthesis (p < 0.001). A subgroup of patients with a newly implanted PPM (n = 102) were followed-up for a median of 73 (IQR 62–85) days. The leading indication for PPM implantation was AVBIII in 74.5% (76/102). Of these patients only 22.4% (17/76) had persistent AVBIII at follow-up. Predictors of AVBIII persistence were prior RBBB (p = 0.04), postdilatation (p = 0.006) and higher mean aortic valve gradient prior to implantation (p = 0.013). PPMs were implanted earlier in patients with persisting AVBIII [1 day (IQR0–2.5) vs. 4 days (IQR2–7); p < 0.001]. Early PPM implantation after TAVI was the only independent predictor of persistent AVBIII [OR 1.36 (95% 1.05–1.75); p = 0.02].

Conclusion

The long-term persistence of AVBIII is generally low after TAVI. Therefore, it may be wise to postpone the indication for PPM implantation for a couple of days. The only predictors of a lack of recovery of the AVB are prior RBBB, higher mean aortic valve gradients and postdilatation of the prosthesis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith C, Leon M, Mack M et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed Smith C, Leon M, Mack M et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Leon M, Smith C, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607CrossRefPubMed Leon M, Smith C, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gaede L, Möllmann H (2015) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): current perspectives. Herz 54:742–751CrossRef Gaede L, Möllmann H (2015) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): current perspectives. Herz 54:742–751CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gaede L, Kim W-K, Blumenstein J et al (2017) Temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Herz 42:316–324CrossRefPubMed Gaede L, Kim W-K, Blumenstein J et al (2017) Temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Herz 42:316–324CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gaede L, Blumenstein J, Kim W-K et al (2017) Trends in aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2015: transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve repair. Clin Res Cardiol 106:411–419CrossRefPubMed Gaede L, Blumenstein J, Kim W-K et al (2017) Trends in aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2015: transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve repair. Clin Res Cardiol 106:411–419CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis—complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis—complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Doenst T, Strüning C, Moschovas A et al (2016) Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 105:801–814CrossRefPubMed Doenst T, Strüning C, Moschovas A et al (2016) Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 105:801–814CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Seidler T, M H, Puls M et al (2016) Feasibility and outcomes of interventional treatment for vascular access site complications following transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 106:183–191CrossRefPubMed Seidler T, M H, Puls M et al (2016) Feasibility and outcomes of interventional treatment for vascular access site complications following transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 106:183–191CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Arsalan M, Filardo G, Kim WK et al (2016) Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 105:1042–1048CrossRefPubMed Arsalan M, Filardo G, Kim WK et al (2016) Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 105:1042–1048CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A et al (2012) Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:391–397CrossRefPubMed Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A et al (2012) Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:391–397CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G et al (2015) Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY). J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2173–2180CrossRefPubMed Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G et al (2015) Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY). J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2173–2180CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ et al (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med NEJM 374:1609–1620CrossRefPubMed Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ et al (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med NEJM 374:1609–1620CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ et al (2017) Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 376:1321–1331CrossRefPubMed Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ et al (2017) Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 376:1321–1331CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mohr FW, Holzhey D, Möllmann H et al (2014) The German Aortic Valve Registry: 1-year results from 13,680 patients with aortic valve disease†. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surg 46:808–816CrossRef Mohr FW, Holzhey D, Möllmann H et al (2014) The German Aortic Valve Registry: 1-year results from 13,680 patients with aortic valve disease†. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surg 46:808–816CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fraccaro C, Buja G, Tarantini G et al (2011) Incidence, predictors, and outcome of conduction disorders after transcatheter self-expandable aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 107:747–754CrossRefPubMed Fraccaro C, Buja G, Tarantini G et al (2011) Incidence, predictors, and outcome of conduction disorders after transcatheter self-expandable aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 107:747–754CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT et al (2015) Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:60–69CrossRefPubMed Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT et al (2015) Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:60–69CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Urena M, Rodés-Cabau J (2015) Permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:70–73CrossRefPubMed Urena M, Rodés-Cabau J (2015) Permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:70–73CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schymik G, Tzamalis P, Bramlage P et al (2015) Retro Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort. Clin Res Cardiol 104:351–362CrossRefPubMed Schymik G, Tzamalis P, Bramlage P et al (2015) Retro Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort. Clin Res Cardiol 104:351–362CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gonska B, Seeger J, Keßler M et al (2017) Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. Clin Res Cardiol. doi:10.1007/s00392-017-1093-2 (epub ahead of print) PubMed Gonska B, Seeger J, Keßler M et al (2017) Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. Clin Res Cardiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00392-017-1093-2 (epub ahead of print) PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kempfert J, Meyer A, Kim W-K et al (2016) Comparison of two valve systems for transapical aortic valve implantation: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg 49:486–492CrossRef Kempfert J, Meyer A, Kim W-K et al (2016) Comparison of two valve systems for transapical aortic valve implantation: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg 49:486–492CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim W-K, Rolf A, Liebetrau C et al (2014) Detection of myocardial injury by CMR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:349–357CrossRefPubMed Kim W-K, Rolf A, Liebetrau C et al (2014) Detection of myocardial injury by CMR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:349–357CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Möllmann H, Kim W-K, Kempfert J et al (2014) Transfemoral aortic valve implantation of edwards SAPIEN XT without predilatation is feasible. Clin Cardiol 37:667–671CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Kim W-K, Kempfert J et al (2014) Transfemoral aortic valve implantation of edwards SAPIEN XT without predilatation is feasible. Clin Cardiol 37:667–671CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Walther T, Möllmann H, van Linden A, Kempfert J (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation transapical: step by step. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:55–61CrossRefPubMed Walther T, Möllmann H, van Linden A, Kempfert J (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation transapical: step by step. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:55–61CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Möllmann H, Kempfert J, Hamm CW, Walther T (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Herz 35:62–68CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Kempfert J, Hamm CW, Walther T (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Herz 35:62–68CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Abdel-Wahab M, Mehilli J, Frerker C et al (2014) Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAMA 311:1503–1514CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Wahab M, Mehilli J, Frerker C et al (2014) Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAMA 311:1503–1514CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ramazzina C, Knecht S, Jeger R et al (2014) Pacemaker implantation and need for ventricular pacing during follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1592–1601CrossRefPubMed Ramazzina C, Knecht S, Jeger R et al (2014) Pacemaker implantation and need for ventricular pacing during follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1592–1601CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Boerlage -VAN, Dijk K, Kooiman KM, Yong ZY et al (2014) Predictors and permanency of cardiac conduction disorders and necessity of pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1520–1529CrossRef Boerlage -VAN, Dijk K, Kooiman KM, Yong ZY et al (2014) Predictors and permanency of cardiac conduction disorders and necessity of pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1520–1529CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Vasa-Nicotera M et al (2009) Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve bioprosthesis. Am Heart J 157:860–866CrossRefPubMed Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Vasa-Nicotera M et al (2009) Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve bioprosthesis. Am Heart J 157:860–866CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference van der Boon RMA, Van Mieghem NM, Theuns DA et al (2013) Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve System. Int J Cardiol 168:1269–1273CrossRefPubMed van der Boon RMA, Van Mieghem NM, Theuns DA et al (2013) Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve System. Int J Cardiol 168:1269–1273CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C et al (2014) Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation 129:1233–1243CrossRefPubMed Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C et al (2014) Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation 129:1233–1243CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Urena M, Rodés-cabau J, Hospital BB, Heart Q (2015) EuroIntervention Managing heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from monitoring to device selection and pacemaker indications. EuroIntervention 11:W101–W105CrossRefPubMed Urena M, Rodés-cabau J, Hospital BB, Heart Q (2015) EuroIntervention Managing heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from monitoring to device selection and pacemaker indications. EuroIntervention 11:W101–W105CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329CrossRefPubMed Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference van der Boon RM, Nuis R-J, Van Mieghem NM et al (2012) New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:454–463CrossRefPubMed van der Boon RM, Nuis R-J, Van Mieghem NM et al (2012) New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:454–463CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J et al (2006) Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1927–1937CrossRefPubMed Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J et al (2006) Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1927–1937CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Chan JYS, Fang F, Zhang Q et al (2011) Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function: 2-year results of the PACE trial. Eur Heart J 32:2533–2540CrossRefPubMed Chan JYS, Fang F, Zhang Q et al (2011) Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function: 2-year results of the PACE trial. Eur Heart J 32:2533–2540CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Stockburger M, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G et al (2011) Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail 13:633–641. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfr041 CrossRefPubMed Stockburger M, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G et al (2011) Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail 13:633–641. doi:10.​1093/​eurjhf/​hfr041 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pacemaker implantation after TAVI: predictors of AV block persistence
Authors
Luise Gaede
Won-Keun Kim
Christoph Liebetrau
Oliver Dörr
Johannes Sperzel
Johannes Blumenstein
Alexander Berkowitsch
Thomas Walther
Christian Hamm
Albrecht Elsässer
Holger Nef
Helge Möllmann
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1158-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Clinical Research in Cardiology 1/2018 Go to the issue