Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Paper

Applicability of next generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in aortic annuli exceeding formally approved dimensions

Authors: Andreas Schaefer, Matthias Linder, Hendrik Treede, Florian Deuschl, Niklas Schofer, Moritz Seiffert, Yvonne Schneeberger, Stefan Blankenberg, Hermann Reichenspurner, Ulrich Schaefer, Lenard Conradi

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Physicians are frequently confronted with patients suffering from aortic stenosis with annular diameters exceeding dimensions in which currently available transcatheter heart valves (THV) are formally approved. Experience in patients receiving significantly undersized Sapien 3 (S3) THV (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) in aortic annuli up to 32 mm has not been reported so far.

Methods

Patients with aortic annuli exceeding the formally determined upper size limit and who received a 29 mm S3, were identified from our database. Calcification pattern and annulus dimension were analyzed retrospectively using the 3mensio Medical Imaging software. Clinical endpoints were adjudicated in accordance with the updated standardized VARC-2 definitions.

Results

21 consecutive patients with aortic annuli ≥28.1 mm received a 29 mm THV. All patients were male (77.4 ± 8.1 year, logEuroSCORE I 22.5 ± 14.1 %). Multi-slice computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography derived annular dimensions were 30.2 ± 1.5 vs. 28.8 ± 0.9 mm (p = 0.0001). Total calcium load of the aortic valves was 1327 ± 957 mm3. Device success according to VARC-2 definitions was achieved in 100 % (21/21). All-cause 30-day mortality was 0 % (0/21). Rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was 14.3 % (3/21). No paravalvular leakage ≥ grade II was detectable.

Conclusions

Preliminary experience suggests implantation of this type of THV in aortic annuli up to 32 mm to be feasible and safe, in particular calcification patterns. It does not result in a relevant incidence of PVL ≥ grade II, or increased rate of VARC-2 adjudicated clinical endpoints. Also, functional outcomes regarding transvalvular gradients or EOA demonstrate applicability of this THV in such patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198CrossRefPubMed Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H et al (2012) Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 366(18):1696–1704CrossRefPubMed Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H et al (2012) Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 366(18):1696–1704CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version (2012) The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012(42):S1–S44 Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version (2012) The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012(42):S1–S44
4.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(22):2438–2488CrossRefPubMed Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(22):2438–2488CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Holzamer A, Sitka E, Hengstenberg C et al (2015) Multislice computed tomography-based prediction of the implantation plane in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: determination of the line of perpendicularity and the implanter’s views. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48(6):879–886CrossRefPubMed Holzamer A, Sitka E, Hengstenberg C et al (2015) Multislice computed tomography-based prediction of the implantation plane in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: determination of the line of perpendicularity and the implanter’s views. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48(6):879–886CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schmidkonz C, Marwan M, Klinghammer L et al (2014) Interobserver variability of CT angiography for evaluation of aortic annulus dimensions prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Eur J Radiol 83(9):1672–1678CrossRefPubMed Schmidkonz C, Marwan M, Klinghammer L et al (2014) Interobserver variability of CT angiography for evaluation of aortic annulus dimensions prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Eur J Radiol 83(9):1672–1678CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Staubach S, Franke J, Gerckens U et al (2013) Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 81(2):348–355CrossRefPubMed Staubach S, Franke J, Gerckens U et al (2013) Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 81(2):348–355CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Husser O, Holzamer A, Resch M et al (2013) Prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation—comparison of three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography with multislice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 168(4):3431–3438CrossRefPubMed Husser O, Holzamer A, Resch M et al (2013) Prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation—comparison of three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography with multislice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 168(4):3431–3438CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Leber AW, Eichinger W, Rieber J et al (2013) MSCT guided sizing of the Edwards Sapien XT TAVI device: impact of different degrees of oversizing on clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol 168(3):2658–2664CrossRefPubMed Leber AW, Eichinger W, Rieber J et al (2013) MSCT guided sizing of the Edwards Sapien XT TAVI device: impact of different degrees of oversizing on clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol 168(3):2658–2664CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mylotte D, Andalib A, Thériault-Lauzier P et al (2015) Transcatheter heart valve failure: a systematic review. Eur Heart J 36(21):1306–1327CrossRefPubMed Mylotte D, Andalib A, Thériault-Lauzier P et al (2015) Transcatheter heart valve failure: a systematic review. Eur Heart J 36(21):1306–1327CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schymik G, Schröfel H, Heimeshoff M et al (2015) How to adapt the implantation technique for the new SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve design. J Interv Cardiol 28(1):82–89CrossRefPubMed Schymik G, Schröfel H, Heimeshoff M et al (2015) How to adapt the implantation technique for the new SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve design. J Interv Cardiol 28(1):82–89CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Seiffert M, Franzen O, Conradi L et al (2010) Series of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantations in high-risk patients with degenerated bioprostheses in aortic and mitral position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:608–615CrossRefPubMed Seiffert M, Franzen O, Conradi L et al (2010) Series of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantations in high-risk patients with degenerated bioprostheses in aortic and mitral position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:608–615CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P et al (2012) Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:S45–S60CrossRefPubMed Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P et al (2012) Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:S45–S60CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
16.
go back to reference Yang TH, Webb JG, Blanke P et al (2015) Incidence and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation with multidetector computed tomography nominal area oversizing or undersizing after transcatheter heart valve replacement with the Sapien 3: a comparison with the Sapien XT. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(3):462–471CrossRefPubMed Yang TH, Webb JG, Blanke P et al (2015) Incidence and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation with multidetector computed tomography nominal area oversizing or undersizing after transcatheter heart valve replacement with the Sapien 3: a comparison with the Sapien XT. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(3):462–471CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150(2):142–145CrossRefPubMed Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150(2):142–145CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Haensig M, Rastan AJ (2012) Aortic valve calcium load before TAVI: is it important? Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(2):160–164PubMedPubMedCentral Haensig M, Rastan AJ (2012) Aortic valve calcium load before TAVI: is it important? Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(2):160–164PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Schymik G, Heimeshoff M, Bramlage P et al (2014) Ruptures of the device landing zone in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis of TAVI Karlsruhe (TAVIK) patients. Clin Res Cardiol 103(11):912–920CrossRefPubMed Schymik G, Heimeshoff M, Bramlage P et al (2014) Ruptures of the device landing zone in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis of TAVI Karlsruhe (TAVIK) patients. Clin Res Cardiol 103(11):912–920CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefèvre T et al (2013) Potential mechanism of annulus rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(5):E742–E746CrossRefPubMed Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefèvre T et al (2013) Potential mechanism of annulus rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(5):E742–E746CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Applicability of next generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in aortic annuli exceeding formally approved dimensions
Authors
Andreas Schaefer
Matthias Linder
Hendrik Treede
Florian Deuschl
Niklas Schofer
Moritz Seiffert
Yvonne Schneeberger
Stefan Blankenberg
Hermann Reichenspurner
Ulrich Schaefer
Lenard Conradi
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0954-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Clinical Research in Cardiology 7/2016 Go to the issue