Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Review

Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection

Authors: Laurence Devoto, Valerio Celentano, Richard Cohen, Jim Khan, Manish Chand

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of death from neoplastic disease in men and third in women of all ages. Globally, life expectancy is increasing, and consequently, an increasing number of operations are being performed on more elderly patients with the trend set to continue.
Elderly patients are more likely to have cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities that are associated with increased peri-operative risk. They further tend to present with more locally advanced disease, more likely to obstruct or have disseminated disease.
The aim of this review was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal resection in very elderly patients, and whether there are benefits over open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on Medline, Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar. All comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the patients population over 85 were included.
The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes were operating time, time to oral diet, number of retrieved lymph nodes, blood loss and 5-year survival.

Results

The search provided 1507 citations. Sixty-nine articles were retrieved for full text analysis, and only six retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall mortality for elective laparoscopic resection was 2.92% and morbidity 23%. No single study showed a significant difference between laparoscopic and open surgery for morbidity or mortality, but pooled data analysis demonstrated reduced morbidity in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.032). Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are more likely to have a shorter hospital stay and a shorter time to oral diet.

Conclusion

Elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in the over 85 age group is feasible and safe and offers similar advantages over open surgery to those demonstrated in patients of younger ages.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malvezzi M, Arfe A, Bertuccio P et al (2011) European cancer mortality predictors for the year 2011. Ann Oncol 22:947–956CrossRefPubMed Malvezzi M, Arfe A, Bertuccio P et al (2011) European cancer mortality predictors for the year 2011. Ann Oncol 22:947–956CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stepien S, Gluszek S, Koziel D et al (2014) The risk of surgical treatment in patients aged 85+, with special consideration of colorectal cancer. Pol Prezegl Chir 86(3):132–140 Stepien S, Gluszek S, Koziel D et al (2014) The risk of surgical treatment in patients aged 85+, with special consideration of colorectal cancer. Pol Prezegl Chir 86(3):132–140
5.
go back to reference Merlin F, Prochilo T, Tondulli L et al (2008) Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: an update on recent clinical studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 7:357–363CrossRefPubMed Merlin F, Prochilo T, Tondulli L et al (2008) Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: an update on recent clinical studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 7:357–363CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M et al (2007) Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 246:222–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M et al (2007) Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 246:222–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Ganai S, Lee KF, Merrill A et al (2007) Adverse outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are at high risk for delirium. Arch Surg 142:1072–1078CrossRefPubMed Ganai S, Lee KF, Merrill A et al (2007) Adverse outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are at high risk for delirium. Arch Surg 142:1072–1078CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Scott NA, Jeacock J, Kingston RD (1995) Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:321–323CrossRefPubMed Scott NA, Jeacock J, Kingston RD (1995) Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:321–323CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson V et al (2007) Surgical risk factors, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson V et al (2007) Surgical risk factors, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jafari MD, Hafari F, Halabi WJ et al (2014) Colorectal cancer resections in the aging US population: a trend toward decreasing rates and improved outcomes. JAMA Surg 149:557–564CrossRefPubMed Jafari MD, Hafari F, Halabi WJ et al (2014) Colorectal cancer resections in the aging US population: a trend toward decreasing rates and improved outcomes. JAMA Surg 149:557–564CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:4383–4391CrossRef Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:4383–4391CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R et al (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R et al (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Takahata O, Kunisawa T, Nagashima M et al (2007) Effect of age on pulmonary gas exchange during laparoscopy in the Trenedelenburg lithotomy position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:687–692CrossRefPubMed Takahata O, Kunisawa T, Nagashima M et al (2007) Effect of age on pulmonary gas exchange during laparoscopy in the Trenedelenburg lithotomy position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:687–692CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group, European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):iii-x):1–173CrossRef Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group, European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):iii-x):1–173CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tominaga T, Takeshita H, Arai J et al (2015) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Dig Surg 32:32–38CrossRefPubMed Tominaga T, Takeshita H, Arai J et al (2015) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Dig Surg 32:32–38CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mukai T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M et al (2014) Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:366–369CrossRefPubMed Mukai T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M et al (2014) Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:366–369CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espin Basany E et al (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28:3373–3378CrossRefPubMed Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espin Basany E et al (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28:3373–3378CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nakamura T, Sato T, Miura H et al (2014) Feasibility and outcomes of surgical therapy in very elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:85–88CrossRefPubMed Nakamura T, Sato T, Miura H et al (2014) Feasibility and outcomes of surgical therapy in very elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:85–88CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A et al (2009) A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 47:626–633CrossRefPubMed van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A et al (2009) A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 47:626–633CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hernandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89CrossRef Hernandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J et al (2007) Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing 36(2):190–196CrossRefPubMed Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J et al (2007) Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing 36(2):190–196CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Marush F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120CrossRef Marush F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Giglio MC, Celentano V, Tarquini R et al (2015) Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Int J Color Dis 30(11):1445–1455CrossRef Giglio MC, Celentano V, Tarquini R et al (2015) Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Int J Color Dis 30(11):1445–1455CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore A, Delaney et al (2005) Evaluation for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tekkis PP, Senagore A, Delaney et al (2005) Evaluation for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Mackenzie H, Miksovic D, Ni M et al (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27:2704–2711CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie H, Miksovic D, Ni M et al (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27:2704–2711CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection
Authors
Laurence Devoto
Valerio Celentano
Richard Cohen
Jim Khan
Manish Chand
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2848-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2017 Go to the issue