Top

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Published in:

01-07-2012 | Review

Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?

Authors: O. E. Aly, Z. Quayyum

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 7/2012

Abstract

Background

Several studies have confirmed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) has superior short-term outcomes when compared to open colorectal surgery. However, the evidence for cost-effectiveness of LCS is less clear.

Aim

The aim of this study is to explore the cost-effectiveness of LCS over time since it was first developed in 1991.

Methods

Systematic review of the literature was conducted. Electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar) were searched for studies from 1991 to 2010 using the keywords “laparoscopic, colorectal surgery cost, economic evaluation”.

Results

Fifteen economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria. The percentage cost difference between open and laparoscopic surgery varied widely between different studies. The general trend when observing all the included economic evaluations is that there is a moderate negative correlation between progression of time and the size of the cost gap between laparoscopic and open surgery (R-value = −0.44). This correlation is even stronger (R-value = −0.64, P = 0.046) if the studies are subdivided by the country where the surgery was carried out in. Western healthcare systems, even though they had a heterogeneous set of results (SD = 27%), showed a decline in costs of laparoscopic surgery with time.

Conclusion

From the current trends, it is projected that the results of future economic evaluations will unequivocally show that laparoscopic surgery is cheaper than open surgery. The initial higher costs of laparoscopic surgery training may be worth the savings made in the long term if it is practised in settings where postoperative care is expensive.

Hernández RA, de Verteuil RM, Fraser CM, Vale LD, Aberdeen Health Technology Assessment Group (2008) Systematic review of economic evaluations of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10(9):859–868PubMed

Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142(3):298–303PubMedCrossRef

Chapman AE, Levitt MD, Hewett P, Woods R, Sheiner H, Maddern GJ (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies. Ann Surg 234(5):590–606PubMedCrossRef

Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed

Joo JS, Amarnath L, Wexner SD (1998) Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial? Surg Endosc 12(11):1341–1344PubMedCrossRef

Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(9):1111–1124PubMedCrossRef

Saba AK, Kerlakian GM, Kasper GC, Hearn AT (1995) Laparoscopy assisted colectomies versus open colectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 5(1):1–6PubMedCrossRef

Pfeifer J, Wexner SD, Reissman P et al (1995) Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery: costs and outcome. Surg Endosc 9:1322–1326PubMed

Philipson BM, Bokey EL, Moore JW et al (1997) Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. World J Surg 21:214–217PubMedCrossRef

10.

Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR et al (1998) Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 41:832–838PubMedCrossRef

11.

Janson M, Björholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91:409–417PubMedCrossRef

12.

Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72PubMed

13.

Shabbir A, Roslani AC, Wong KS, Tsang CB, Wong HB, Cheong WK (2009) Is laparoscopic colectomy as cost beneficial as open colectomy? ANZ J Surg 79(4):265–270PubMedCrossRef

14.

Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef

15.

Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11:323326

16.

Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:890–896PubMedCrossRef

17.

Senagore AJ et al (2005) Diagnosis related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1016–1020PubMedCrossRef

18.

Franks (2006) unpublished data extracted from Murray A, Lourenco T, de Verteuil R, Hernandez R, Fraser C, McKinley A, Krukowski Z, Vale L, Grant A. (2006) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 10:1–141

19.

King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, Franks PJ, Longman RJ, Kendrick AH et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308PubMedCrossRef

20.

Park J et al (2007) Economics and the laparoscopic surgery learning curve: comparison with open surgery for rectosigmoid cancer. World J Surg 31:1827–1834PubMedCrossRef

21.

Choi YS et al (2007) Economic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Korea. Surg Today 37:127–132PubMedCrossRef

22.

Ridgway PF, Boyle E, Keane FB, Neary P (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy is cheaper than conventional open resection. Colorectal Dis 9(9):819–824PubMedCrossRef

23.

Bouvet M, Mansfield PF, Skibber JM, Curley SA, Ellis LM, Giacco GG, Madary AR, Ota DM, Feig BW (1998) Clinical, pathologic, and economic parameters of laparoscopic colon resection for cancer. Am J Surg 176(6):554–558PubMedCrossRef

24.

Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1977) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132(1):41–44CrossRef

25.

Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15(8):827–832PubMedCrossRef

26.

Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214PubMedCrossRef

27.

NICE. Colorectal cancer—laparoscopic surgery (review). Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/TA105 [Accessed December 20, 2010]

28.

Faiz O, Warusavitarne J, Bottle A, Tekkis PP, Darzi AW, Kennedy RH (2009) Laparoscopically assisted vs. open elective colonic and rectal resection: a comparison of outcomes in English National Health Service Trusts between 1996 and 2006. Dis Colon Rectum 52(10):1695–1704PubMedCrossRef

29.

King PM et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308PubMedCrossRef

30.

Franks. Unpublished data extracted from Murray A, Lourenco T, de Verteuil R, Hernandez R, Fraser C, McKinley A, Krukowski Z, Vale L, Grant A. (2006) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 10:1–141

31.

Lachin JM, Matts JP, Wei LJ (1988) Randomization in clinical trials: conclusions and recommendations. Control Clin Trials 9(4):365–374PubMedCrossRef

32.

Naylor CD (1995) Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet 345(8953):840–842PubMedCrossRef

33.

Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54PubMedCrossRef

34.

Rotholtz NA, Laporte M, Zanoni G, Bun ME, Aued L, Lencinas S, Mezzadri NA, Pereyra L (2008) Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 12(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef

Title: Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?
Authors: O. E. Aly
Z. Quayyum
Publication date: 01-07-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1410-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?

Abstract

Background

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Gene expression analysis in chronic postradiation proctopathy

Underutilisation of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy in adults: a survey of two European countries

Anatomical versus nonanatomical resection of colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis

In vitro biocompatibility of thermally gelling liquid mucoadhesive loaded curcuminoids in colorectal cancer chemoprevention

Polypoid adenocarcinoma in the efferent jejunal loop after total gastrectomy in a Muir–Torre syndrome patient

Life threatening rectal perforation after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)