Top

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Published in:

01-10-2009 | Original Article

Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?

Authors: Fergal J. Fleming, Peter Gillen

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 10/2009

Abstract

Background

Patients who undergo a Hartmann’s procedure may not be offered a reversal due to concerns over the morbidity of the second procedure. The aims of this study were to examine the morbidity post reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.

Methods

Patients who underwent a Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis (Hinchey 3 or 4) between 1995 and 2006 were studied. Clinical factors including patient comorbidities were analysed to elucidate what preoperative factors were associated with complications following reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.

Results

One hundred and ten patients were included. Median age was 70 years and 56% of the cohort were male (n = 61). The mortality and morbidity rate for the acute presentation was 7.3% (n = 8) and 34% (n = 37) respectively. Seventy six patients (69%) underwent a reversal at a median of 7 months (range 3–22 months) post-Hartmann’s procedure. The complication rate in the reversal group was 25% (n = 18). A history of current smoking (p = 0.004), increasing time to reversal (p = 0.04) and low preoperative albumin (p = 0.003) were all associated with complications following reversal.

Conclusions

Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure can be offered to appropriately selected patients though with a significant (25%) morbidity rate. The identification of potential modifiable factors such as current smoking, prolonged time to reversal and low preoperative albumin may allow optimisation of such patients preoperatively.

Rothenberger DA, Wiltz O (1993) Surgery for complicated diverticulitis. Surg Clin North Am 73:975–992PubMed

Al-Sahaf O, Al-Azawi D, Fauzi MZ et al (2008) Early discharge policy of patients with acute colonic diverticulitis following initial CT scan. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:979–984CrossRef

Bannerjee S, Leather AJ, Rennie JA et al (2005) Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann’s. Colorectal Dis 7:454–459CrossRef

Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ (1992) Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 79(8):839–841PubMedCrossRef

Oomen JL, Cuesta MA, Engel AF (2005) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure after surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is safe and possible in most patients. Dig Surg 22:419–425PubMedCrossRef

Wigmore SJ, Duthie GS, Young IE et al (1995) Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann’s procedure: the Lothian experience 1987–1992. Br J Surg 82:27–30PubMedCrossRef

ReMine SG, Dozois RR (1981) Hartmann’s procedure—it’s use with complicated carcinomas of sigmoid colon and rectum. Arch Surg 116:630–633PubMed

Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U et al (1987) The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirug 58(2):84–92

Lorimer JW, Doumit G (2007) Comorbidity is a major determinant of severity in acute diverticulitis. Am J Surg 193:681–685PubMedCrossRef

10.

Breitenstein S, Kraus A, Hahnloser D et al (2007) Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation. Primary anastamosis or Hartmann’s procedure? A case-matched control study. World J Surg 31:2117–2124PubMedCrossRef

11.

Roque-Castellano C, Marchena-Gomez J, Hemmersbach-Miller M et al (2007) Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann’s procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1091–1096PubMedCrossRef

12.

Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen U, Kallehave F et al (2005) Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg 241(4):654–658PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U et al (2007) Risk factors for clinical anastamotic leakage and postoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:919–927PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T (2003) Short-term smoking cessation intervention does not affect postoperative complications in colorectal surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Colorectal Dis 5:347–352PubMedCrossRef

15.

Lindstrom D, Azodi OS, Wladis A et al (2008) Effects of a perioperative smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised trial. Ann Surg 248(5):739–745PubMedCrossRef

16.

Moller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T et al (2002) Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 359:114–117PubMedCrossRef

17.

Schmelzer TM, Mostafa G, Norton J et al (2007) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a high risk operation? Surgery 14294:598–607CrossRef

18.

Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W et al (1999) Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity. Arch Surg 134:36–42PubMedCrossRef

19.

Bozzetti F, Gianotti L, Braga M et al (2007) Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support. Clin Nutr 26:698–709PubMedCrossRef

20.

Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A et al (1991) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: timing and operative technique. Br J Surg 78:1167–1170PubMedCrossRef

21.

Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S et al (2003) Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann’s procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 18(6):503–507PubMedCrossRef

22.

Abbas S (2007) Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(4):351–357PubMedCrossRef

23.

Constantinides VA, Heriot A, Remzi F et al (2007) Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastamosis versus Hartmann’s procedures. Ann Surg 245(1):94–103PubMedCrossRef

24.

Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure—a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 23(3):496–502PubMedCrossRef

25.

Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767PubMedCrossRef

Title: Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?
Authors: Fergal J. Fleming
Peter Gillen
Publication date: 01-10-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0747-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Inflamed pouch mucosa possesses altered tight junctions indicating recurrence of inflammatory bowel disease

Adenocarcinoma of the small intestine complicating Crohn’s disease

Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update

A simple quality of life questionnaire for patients with faecal incontinence

Types of pelvic floor dysfunctions in nulliparous, vaginal delivery, and cesarean section female patients with obstructed defecation syndrome identified by echodefecography

Is routine pathological examination necessary in appendectomy for acute appendicitis?