Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2009

01-10-2009 | Original Article

A simple quality of life questionnaire for patients with faecal incontinence

Authors: Jo Krysa, Monica Lyons, Andrew B. Williams

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

A simple quality of life questionnaire was designed to triage patients with faecal incontinence to the most appropriate level of support, investigation and treatment.

Method

A questionnaire was developed to include a ‘symptom’ score, similar in content to St Mark’s questionnaire and a ‘bothersome’ score. A pilot study (34 patients) assessed the clarity of questions. Once content validity was established, it was sent to 360 patients who attended a pelvic floor clinic. Its external validity was assessed against the established standards of the short form 36 (SF-36) and the Manchester Health Questionnaires. Ease of use for these was assessed using a separate form.

Results

Of the 360 patients, 86 replied. The questionnaire was shown to be reliable both by measurement of its internal consistency and by test-retest analysis. There was a significant correlation between the scores of the new questionnaire and the Manchester Health Questionnaire as well as the SF-36. Divergence validity, assessed by correlating the number of pads used and the overall symptom score, was established. The new questionnaire was easiest to complete, taking on average 4 min.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that the new questionnaire is reliable and valid. It is easy and quick to complete and assesses both severity and impact of symptoms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S (1995) Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 274:559–61PubMedCrossRef Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S (1995) Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 274:559–61PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Donovan J, Bosch R, Gotoh M, Jackson S (2005) Symptom and quality of life assessment. JAMA 294:2697–8CrossRef Donovan J, Bosch R, Gotoh M, Jackson S (2005) Symptom and quality of life assessment. JAMA 294:2697–8CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Anronson NK (1989) Quality of life assessment in clinical trails: methodologic issues. Control Clin Trials 10:s195–s208CrossRef Anronson NK (1989) Quality of life assessment in clinical trails: methodologic issues. Control Clin Trials 10:s195–s208CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bug GJ, Kiff ES, Hosker G (2001) A new condition specific health related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with anal incontinence. BJOG 108:1057–67PubMedCrossRef Bug GJ, Kiff ES, Hosker G (2001) A new condition specific health related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with anal incontinence. BJOG 108:1057–67PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16PubMedCrossRef Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hiller L, Radley S (2002) Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of bowel and lower urinary tract symptoms in women. BJOG 109:413–23PubMedCrossRef Hiller L, Radley S (2002) Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of bowel and lower urinary tract symptoms in women. BJOG 109:413–23PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1525–32PubMedCrossRef Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1525–32PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New York Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New York
10.
go back to reference Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care (1993) A quality of life measurement in health care, a review of measures and population norms for the UK-SF-36. University of Oxford, Oxford Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care (1993) A quality of life measurement in health care, a review of measures and population norms for the UK-SF-36. University of Oxford, Oxford
11.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Badia X, Corcos J (2002) Symptoms and quality of life assessment. Incontinence. Health, Plymouth, pp 267–316 Donovan JL, Badia X, Corcos J (2002) Symptoms and quality of life assessment. Incontinence. Health, Plymouth, pp 267–316
12.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) Faecal incontinence: the management of faecal incontinence in adults. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, England National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) Faecal incontinence: the management of faecal incontinence in adults. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, England
13.
go back to reference Avis NE, Smith KW (1994) Conceptual and methodological issues in selecting and developing quality of life measures. Quality of life in health care, vol 5. JAI, Greenwich Avis NE, Smith KW (1994) Conceptual and methodological issues in selecting and developing quality of life measures. Quality of life in health care, vol 5. JAI, Greenwich
14.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324(7347):1183PubMedCrossRef Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324(7347):1183PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A simple quality of life questionnaire for patients with faecal incontinence
Authors
Jo Krysa
Monica Lyons
Andrew B. Williams
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0769-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2009 Go to the issue