Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 2/2017

Open Access 01-02-2017 | Original Article

Combined T2 and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with template prostate biopsies in men suspected with prostate cancer but negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies

Authors: Nissar Sheikh, Cheng Wei, Magdalena Szewczyk-Bieda, Annie Campbell, Shaukat Memon, Stephen Lang, Ghulam Nabi

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Transperineal template prostate (TPB) biopsy has been shown to improve prostate cancer detection in men with rising PSA and previous negative TRUS biopsies. Diagnostic performance of this approach especially MR imaging and using reliable reference standard remains scantly reported.

Materials and methods

A total of 200 patients, who were previously TRUS biopsy negative, were recruited in this study. All the participants had at least 28-core TPB under general anesthetic within 8 weeks of previous negative TRUS biopsies. In 15 men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, prostate specimens were sectioned using custom-made molds and analyzed by experienced pathologist as a feasibility study.

Results

In total, 120 of 200 patients (60 %) had positive TPB biopsy results. All of these men had at least one negative biopsy from transrectal route. T2 diffusion-weighted MR imaging showed no lesion in almost one-third of these men (61/200; 30.5 %). Out of these, 33 (33/61; 54 %) showed malignancy on TPB including high-grade tumors (>Gleason 7). Out of 15 patients underwent surgery with a total of 52 lesions (mean 3.5) on radical prostatectomy histology analyses, TPB detected 36 (70 %) lesions only. Some of these lesions were Gleason 7 and more mostly located in the posterior basal area of prostate.

Conclusions

Transperineal template biopsy technique is associated with significantly high prostate cancer detection rate in men with previous negative TRUS biopsies, however compared to radical prostatectomy histology map, a significant number of lesions can still be missed in the posterior and basal area of prostate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aarnink RG et al (1998) Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate: innovations and future applications. J Urol 159(5):1568–1579CrossRefPubMed Aarnink RG et al (1998) Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate: innovations and future applications. J Urol 159(5):1568–1579CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Valerio, M et al (2015) Transperineal template prostate-mapping biopsies: an evaluation of different protocols in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. BJU Int Valerio, M et al (2015) Transperineal template prostate-mapping biopsies: an evaluation of different protocols in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. BJU Int
3.
go back to reference Bowen M et al (2013) The emerging role of transperineal template prostate biopsy in patients with a persistently raised PSA despite one negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Int J Surg 11(8):727 Bowen M et al (2013) The emerging role of transperineal template prostate biopsy in patients with a persistently raised PSA despite one negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Int J Surg 11(8):727
4.
go back to reference Klatte T et al (2013) Transperineal template-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with at least two prior negative biopsies. Wien Klin Wochenschr 125(21–22):669–673CrossRefPubMed Klatte T et al (2013) Transperineal template-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with at least two prior negative biopsies. Wien Klin Wochenschr 125(21–22):669–673CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gershman B et al (2013) Transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for patients with persistently elevated PSA and multiple prior negative biopsies. Urol Oncol 31(7):1093–1097CrossRefPubMed Gershman B et al (2013) Transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for patients with persistently elevated PSA and multiple prior negative biopsies. Urol Oncol 31(7):1093–1097CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Davis P, Paul E, Grummet J (2015) Current practice of prostate biopsy in Australia and New Zealand: a survey. Urol Ann 7(3):315–319PubMedPubMedCentral Davis P, Paul E, Grummet J (2015) Current practice of prostate biopsy in Australia and New Zealand: a survey. Urol Ann 7(3):315–319PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Symons JL et al (2013) Outcomes of transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients. BJU Int 112(5):585–593CrossRefPubMed Symons JL et al (2013) Outcomes of transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients. BJU Int 112(5):585–593CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C (2006) How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol 50(6):1163–1174 (discussion 1175)CrossRefPubMed Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C (2006) How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol 50(6):1163–1174 (discussion 1175)CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Trivedi H et al (2012) Use of patient-specific MRI-based prostate mold for validation of multiparametric MRI in localization of prostate cancer. Urology 79(1):233–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trivedi H et al (2012) Use of patient-specific MRI-based prostate mold for validation of multiparametric MRI in localization of prostate cancer. Urology 79(1):233–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Priester A et al (2014) A system for evaluating magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer using patient-specific 3D printed molds. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2(2):127–135PubMedPubMedCentral Priester A et al (2014) A system for evaluating magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer using patient-specific 3D printed molds. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2(2):127–135PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Wei C et al (2014) Computer aided image analysis and rapid prototyping molds using patient-specific MRI data for reliable comparison between imaging and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens. Br J Surg 101:67 Wei C et al (2014) Computer aided image analysis and rapid prototyping molds using patient-specific MRI data for reliable comparison between imaging and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens. Br J Surg 101:67
13.
go back to reference Huo ASY et al (2012) Accuracy of primary systematic template guided transperineal biopsy of the prostate for locating prostate cancer: a comparison with radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 187(6):2044–2050CrossRefPubMed Huo ASY et al (2012) Accuracy of primary systematic template guided transperineal biopsy of the prostate for locating prostate cancer: a comparison with radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 187(6):2044–2050CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Ahmed HU et al (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186(2):458–464CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU et al (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol 186(2):458–464CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marra G et al (2015) 210 Concordance of prostate biopsies with radical prostatectomy: a comparison of transperineal, transrectal and transperineal sector-based template techniques. Eur Urol Suppl 14(2):e210CrossRef Marra G et al (2015) 210 Concordance of prostate biopsies with radical prostatectomy: a comparison of transperineal, transrectal and transperineal sector-based template techniques. Eur Urol Suppl 14(2):e210CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dickinson L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 59(4):477–494CrossRefPubMed Dickinson L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 59(4):477–494CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Epstein JI et al (1994) Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271(5):368–374CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI et al (1994) Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271(5):368–374CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ploussard G et al (2011) The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 60(2):291–303CrossRefPubMed Ploussard G et al (2011) The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 60(2):291–303CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Numao N et al (2013) Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 190(2):502–508CrossRefPubMed Numao N et al (2013) Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 190(2):502–508CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ahmed HU et al (2009) Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6(4):197–206CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU et al (2009) Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6(4):197–206CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tan N et al (2014) MP67-02 prostate cancer missed by multi-parametric MRI: correlation with whole-mount pathology. J Urol 191(4, Supplement):e748–e749CrossRef Tan N et al (2014) MP67-02 prostate cancer missed by multi-parametric MRI: correlation with whole-mount pathology. J Urol 191(4, Supplement):e748–e749CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Le J et al (2014) MP53-01 performance of multi-parametric MRI for high grade prostate cancer: correlation with whole-mount pathology. J Urol 191(4, Supplement):e588CrossRef Le J et al (2014) MP53-01 performance of multi-parametric MRI for high grade prostate cancer: correlation with whole-mount pathology. J Urol 191(4, Supplement):e588CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gibson E et al (2011) Validation of direct registration of whole-mount prostate digital histopathology to ex vivo MR images (Lecture notes in computer science), Springer, Heidelberg Gibson E et al (2011) Validation of direct registration of whole-mount prostate digital histopathology to ex vivo MR images (Lecture notes in computer science), Springer, Heidelberg
27.
go back to reference Orczyk C et al (2012) Imaging of prostate cancer: a platform for 3D co-registration of in vivo MRI ex vivo MRI and pathology. Proc SPIE 8316:83162MCrossRefPubMedCentral Orczyk C et al (2012) Imaging of prostate cancer: a platform for 3D co-registration of in vivo MRI ex vivo MRI and pathology. Proc SPIE 8316:83162MCrossRefPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Hensel JM et al (2007) Development of multiorgan finite element-based prostate deformation model enabling registration of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol*Biol*Phys 68(5):1522–1528CrossRefPubMed Hensel JM et al (2007) Development of multiorgan finite element-based prostate deformation model enabling registration of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol*Biol*Phys 68(5):1522–1528CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Combined T2 and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with template prostate biopsies in men suspected with prostate cancer but negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies
Authors
Nissar Sheikh
Cheng Wei
Magdalena Szewczyk-Bieda
Annie Campbell
Shaukat Memon
Stephen Lang
Ghulam Nabi
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1855-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

World Journal of Urology 2/2017 Go to the issue