Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2010

01-02-2010 | Original Article

Factors predicting inguinal node metastasis in squamous cell cancer of penis

Authors: Suresh K. Bhagat, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, Nitin S. Kekre, Ninan K. Chacko, Santosh Kumar, M. T. Manipadam, Prasanna Samuel

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To identify factors predicting the risk of inguinal metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. The therapeutic advantages of early lymphadenectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis must be counterbalanced against its post-operative morbidity. Loss to follow up is a major problem in developing countries. Generating a nomogram based on clinical lymph node status and histopathological findings in the primary tumor could facilitate clinical decision making in the management of penile cancer.

Methods

We prospectively studied 106 patients with penile squamous cell cancer treated from September 2001 to August 2007 at our institution. All patients were offered lymphadenectomy (LAD). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to develop a nomogram. We highlight the problems of loss to follow up in these patients.

Results

Of 53 who opted for LAD, 22 had nodal metastasis. The presence of high grade (P = 0.004), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P = 0.01) and palpable inguinal lymph nodes (P = 0.05) were the strongest predictors of metastasis. Of 51 who refused LAD, 22 were lost to follow up. Out of these, 16 were at high risk and 9 of them came back with inoperable fungating nodes. A nomogram predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis showed a bias corrected good concordance index (0.74) and good calibration.

Conclusions

High grade and LVI in the tumor along with clinical stage of the inguinal nodes were the strongest predictors of metastasis. These features helped us to develop a nomogram to predict and to identify patients at risk of nodal metastasis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Srinivas V, Morse MJ, Herr HW, Sogani PC, Whitmore WF Jr (1987) Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival. J Urol 137:880PubMed Srinivas V, Morse MJ, Herr HW, Sogani PC, Whitmore WF Jr (1987) Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival. J Urol 137:880PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ornellas AA, Sexias AL, Marota A, Wisnescky A, Campos F, de Moraes JR (1994) Surgical treatment invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151(5):1244–1249PubMed Ornellas AA, Sexias AL, Marota A, Wisnescky A, Campos F, de Moraes JR (1994) Surgical treatment invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151(5):1244–1249PubMed
3.
go back to reference Abi-Aad AS, Dekernion JB (1992) Controversies in ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for cancer of penis. Urol Clin North Am 19:319PubMed Abi-Aad AS, Dekernion JB (1992) Controversies in ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for cancer of penis. Urol Clin North Am 19:319PubMed
4.
go back to reference Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemane JF et al (1993) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Treatment of regional nodes. J Urol 149:492PubMed Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemane JF et al (1993) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Treatment of regional nodes. J Urol 149:492PubMed
5.
go back to reference Beggs JH, Spratt JS (1964) Epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 91:166PubMed Beggs JH, Spratt JS (1964) Epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 91:166PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hardner GJ, Bhanalaph T, Murphy GP et al (1972) Carcinoma of the penis; analysis of therapy in 100 consecutive cases. J Urol 108:428PubMed Hardner GJ, Bhanalaph T, Murphy GP et al (1972) Carcinoma of the penis; analysis of therapy in 100 consecutive cases. J Urol 108:428PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hungerhuber E, Schlenker B, Frimberger D et al (2006) Lymphoscintigraphy in penile cancer: limited value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes. World J Urol 24(3):319–324. doi:10.1007/s00345-006-0073-3 CrossRefPubMed Hungerhuber E, Schlenker B, Frimberger D et al (2006) Lymphoscintigraphy in penile cancer: limited value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes. World J Urol 24(3):319–324. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-006-0073-3 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Murphy GF, Elder DE. Non-melanocytic tumors of the skin. Atlas of tumor pathology, vol 1, 3rd edn. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology 1991, Washington DC Murphy GF, Elder DE. Non-melanocytic tumors of the skin. Atlas of tumor pathology, vol 1, 3rd edn. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology 1991, Washington DC
13.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York
14.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Artibani W, Fandella A, Martignoni G, Novara G et al (2006) Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymphnode involvement inpatients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 175:1700–1705. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)01003-7 CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Artibani W, Fandella A, Martignoni G, Novara G et al (2006) Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymphnode involvement inpatients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 175:1700–1705. doi:10.​1016/​S0022-5347(05)01003-7 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lopes A, Hidalgo GS, Kowalski LP, Torloni H, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP (1996) Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156:1637–1642. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65471-5 CrossRefPubMed Lopes A, Hidalgo GS, Kowalski LP, Torloni H, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP (1996) Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156:1637–1642. doi:10.​1016/​S0022-5347(01)65471-5 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Slaton JW, Morgenstern N, Levy DA et al (2001) Tumor stage, vascular invasion and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 165:1138–1142. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66450-6 CrossRefPubMed Slaton JW, Morgenstern N, Levy DA et al (2001) Tumor stage, vascular invasion and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 165:1138–1142. doi:10.​1016/​S0022-5347(05)66450-6 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Emerson RE, Ulbright TM, Eble JN, Geavy WA, Eckert GJ, Cheng L (2001) Predicting cancer progression in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of depth of invasion and vascular invasion. Mod Pathol 14:963–968. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3880419 CrossRefPubMed Emerson RE, Ulbright TM, Eble JN, Geavy WA, Eckert GJ, Cheng L (2001) Predicting cancer progression in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of depth of invasion and vascular invasion. Mod Pathol 14:963–968. doi:10.​1038/​modpathol.​3880419 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Factors predicting inguinal node metastasis in squamous cell cancer of penis
Authors
Suresh K. Bhagat
Ganesh Gopalakrishnan
Nitin S. Kekre
Ninan K. Chacko
Santosh Kumar
M. T. Manipadam
Prasanna Samuel
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0421-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

World Journal of Urology 1/2010 Go to the issue