Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2022

Open Access 25-08-2022 | Computed Tomography | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Utility of pre-treatment FDG PET/CT–derived machine learning models for outcome prediction in classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Authors: Russell Frood, Matt Clark, Cathy Burton, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Alejandro F. Frangi, Fergus Gleeson, Chirag Patel, Andrew Scarsbrook

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Relapse occurs in ~20% of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) despite treatment adaption based on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography response. The objective was to evaluate pre-treatment FDG PET/CT–derived machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcome in patients with cHL.

Methods

All cHL patients undergoing pre-treatment PET/CT at our institution between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. A 1.5 × mean liver standardised uptake value (SUV) and a fixed 4.0 SUV threshold were used to segment PET/CT data. Feature extraction was performed using PyRadiomics with ComBat harmonisation. Training (80%) and test (20%) cohorts stratified around 2-year event-free survival (EFS), age, sex, ethnicity and disease stage were defined. Seven ML models were trained and hyperparameters tuned using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to assess performance.

Results

A total of 289 patients (153 males), median age 36 (range 16–88 years), were included. There was no significant difference between training (n = 231) and test cohorts (n = 58) (p value > 0.05). A ridge regression model using a 1.5 × mean liver SUV segmentation had the highest performance, with mean training, validation and test AUCs of 0.82 ± 0.002, 0.79 ± 0.01 and 0.81 ± 0.12. However, there was no significant difference between a logistic model derived from metabolic tumour volume and clinical features or the highest performing radiomic model.

Conclusions

Outcome prediction using pre-treatment FDG PET/CT–derived ML models is feasible in cHL patients. Further work is needed to determine optimum predictive thresholds for clinical use.

Key points

• A fixed threshold segmentation method led to more robust radiomic features.
• A radiomic-based model for predicting 2-year event-free survival in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients is feasible.
• A predictive model based on ridge regression was the best performing model on our dataset.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Connors JM, Cozen W, Steidl C et al (2020) Hodgkin lymphoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim 6(1):61CrossRef Connors JM, Cozen W, Steidl C et al (2020) Hodgkin lymphoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim 6(1):61CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shanbhag S, Ambinder RF (2018) Hodgkin lymphoma: a review and update on recent progress. CA Cancer J Clin 68(2):116–132CrossRef Shanbhag S, Ambinder RF (2018) Hodgkin lymphoma: a review and update on recent progress. CA Cancer J Clin 68(2):116–132CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Spinner MA, Varma G, Advani RH (2019) Modern principles in the management of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 184(1):17–29CrossRef Spinner MA, Varma G, Advani RH (2019) Modern principles in the management of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 184(1):17–29CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Follows GA, Ardeshna KM, Barrington SF et al (2014) Guidelines for the first line management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 166(1):34–49CrossRef Follows GA, Ardeshna KM, Barrington SF et al (2014) Guidelines for the first line management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 166(1):34–49CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanoun S, Rossi C, Casasnovas O (2018) [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma: current usefulness and perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 10(5):145CrossRef Kanoun S, Rossi C, Casasnovas O (2018) [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma: current usefulness and perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 10(5):145CrossRef
6.
go back to reference El-Galaly TC, Villa D, Gormsen LC, Baech J, Lo A, Cheah CY (2018) FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions. J Intern Med 284(4):358–376CrossRef El-Galaly TC, Villa D, Gormsen LC, Baech J, Lo A, Cheah CY (2018) FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions. J Intern Med 284(4):358–376CrossRef
7.
go back to reference SEER (2018) SEER cancer statistics review. In: 1975-2016. SEER (2018) SEER cancer statistics review. In: 1975-2016.
8.
go back to reference Hapgood G, Zheng Y, Sehn LH et al (2016) Evaluation of the risk of relapse in classical Hodgkin lymphoma at event-free survival time points and survival comparison with the general population in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol 34(21):2493–2500CrossRef Hapgood G, Zheng Y, Sehn LH et al (2016) Evaluation of the risk of relapse in classical Hodgkin lymphoma at event-free survival time points and survival comparison with the general population in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol 34(21):2493–2500CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Frood R, Burton C, Tsoumpas C et al (2021) Baseline PET/CT imaging parameters for prediction of treatment outcome in Hodgkin and diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(10):3198–3220CrossRef Frood R, Burton C, Tsoumpas C et al (2021) Baseline PET/CT imaging parameters for prediction of treatment outcome in Hodgkin and diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(10):3198–3220CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kinahan PE, Fletcher JW (2010) Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31(6):496–505CrossRef Kinahan PE, Fletcher JW (2010) Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31(6):496–505CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Im H-J, Bradshaw T, Solaiyappan M, Cho SY (2018) Current methods to define metabolic tumor volume in positron emission tomography: which one is better? Nucl Med Mol Imaging 52(1):5–15CrossRef Im H-J, Bradshaw T, Solaiyappan M, Cho SY (2018) Current methods to define metabolic tumor volume in positron emission tomography: which one is better? Nucl Med Mol Imaging 52(1):5–15CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14(12):749–762CrossRef Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14(12):749–762CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Milgrom SA, Elhalawani H, Lee J et al (2019) A PET radiomics model to predict refractory mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma. Sci Rep 9(1):1322CrossRef Milgrom SA, Elhalawani H, Lee J et al (2019) A PET radiomics model to predict refractory mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma. Sci Rep 9(1):1322CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lue K-H, Wu Y-F, Liu S-H et al (2019) Prognostic value of pretreatment radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med 44(10):E559–E565CrossRef Lue K-H, Wu Y-F, Liu S-H et al (2019) Prognostic value of pretreatment radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med 44(10):E559–E565CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sollini M, Kirienko M, Cavinato L et al (2020) Methodological framework for radiomics applications in Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 4:9CrossRef Sollini M, Kirienko M, Cavinato L et al (2020) Methodological framework for radiomics applications in Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 4:9CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Chen Z, Li J, Sang S, Deng S (2021) Radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET in Hodgkin lymphoma are predictive of outcomes. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2021:6347404CrossRef Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Chen Z, Li J, Sang S, Deng S (2021) Radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET in Hodgkin lymphoma are predictive of outcomes. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2021:6347404CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brown PJ, Zhong J, Frood R et al (2019) Prediction of outcome in anal squamous cell carcinoma using radiomic feature analysis of pre-treatment FDG PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46(13):2790–2799CrossRef Brown PJ, Zhong J, Frood R et al (2019) Prediction of outcome in anal squamous cell carcinoma using radiomic feature analysis of pre-treatment FDG PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46(13):2790–2799CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhong J, Frood R, Brown P et al (2021) Machine learning-based FDG PET-CT radiomics for outcome prediction in larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Radiol 76(1):78.e9–78.e17CrossRef Zhong J, Frood R, Brown P et al (2021) Machine learning-based FDG PET-CT radiomics for outcome prediction in larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Radiol 76(1):78.e9–78.e17CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fortin J-P, Cullen N, Sheline YI et al (2018) Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. Neuroimage 167:104–120CrossRef Fortin J-P, Cullen N, Sheline YI et al (2018) Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. Neuroimage 167:104–120CrossRef
20.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRef DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Berkman AM, Andersen CR, Puthenpura V et al (2021) Impact of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status over time on the long-term survival of adolescent and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 30(9):1717–1725CrossRef Berkman AM, Andersen CR, Puthenpura V et al (2021) Impact of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status over time on the long-term survival of adolescent and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 30(9):1717–1725CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mettler J, Müller H, Voltin CA et al (2019) Metabolic tumor volume for response prediction in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. J Nucl Med 60(2):207–211CrossRef Mettler J, Müller H, Voltin CA et al (2019) Metabolic tumor volume for response prediction in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. J Nucl Med 60(2):207–211CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gallicchio R, Mansueto G, Simeon V et al (2014) F-18 FDG PET/CT quantization parameters as predictors of outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 92(5):382–389CrossRef Gallicchio R, Mansueto G, Simeon V et al (2014) F-18 FDG PET/CT quantization parameters as predictors of outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 92(5):382–389CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Adams HJA, de Klerk JMH, Fijnheer R et al (2015) Prognostic superiority of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index over pretreatment whole-body volumetric-metabolic FDG-PET/CT metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 94(6):532–539CrossRef Adams HJA, de Klerk JMH, Fijnheer R et al (2015) Prognostic superiority of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index over pretreatment whole-body volumetric-metabolic FDG-PET/CT metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 94(6):532–539CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Barrington SF, Zwezerijnen BGJC, de Vet HCW et al (2021) Automated segmentation of baseline metabolic total tumor burden in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: which method is most successful? A study on behalf of the PETRA consortium. J Nucl Med 62(3):332–337CrossRef Barrington SF, Zwezerijnen BGJC, de Vet HCW et al (2021) Automated segmentation of baseline metabolic total tumor burden in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: which method is most successful? A study on behalf of the PETRA consortium. J Nucl Med 62(3):332–337CrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Philippe C et al (2018) A postreconstruction harmonization method for multicenter radiomic studies in PET. J Nucl Med 59(8):1321–1328CrossRef Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Philippe C et al (2018) A postreconstruction harmonization method for multicenter radiomic studies in PET. J Nucl Med 59(8):1321–1328CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Orlhac F, Eertink JJ, Cottereau AS et al (2022) A guide to ComBat harmonization of imaging biomarkers in multicenter studies. J Nucl Med 63(2):172–179CrossRef Orlhac F, Eertink JJ, Cottereau AS et al (2022) A guide to ComBat harmonization of imaging biomarkers in multicenter studies. J Nucl Med 63(2):172–179CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lang N, Crump M (2020) PET-adapted approaches to primary therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol 11:204062072091449CrossRef Lang N, Crump M (2020) PET-adapted approaches to primary therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol 11:204062072091449CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Park JE, Kim D, Kim HS et al (2020) Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement. Eur Radiol 30(1):523–536CrossRef Park JE, Kim D, Kim HS et al (2020) Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement. Eur Radiol 30(1):523–536CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Pinto dos Santos D, Dietzel M, Baessler B (2021) A decade of radiomics research: are images really data or just patterns in the noise? Eur Radiol 31(1):2–5CrossRef Pinto dos Santos D, Dietzel M, Baessler B (2021) A decade of radiomics research: are images really data or just patterns in the noise? Eur Radiol 31(1):2–5CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of pre-treatment FDG PET/CT–derived machine learning models for outcome prediction in classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Authors
Russell Frood
Matt Clark
Cathy Burton
Charalampos Tsoumpas
Alejandro F. Frangi
Fergus Gleeson
Chirag Patel
Andrew Scarsbrook
Publication date
25-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09039-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2022

European Radiology 10/2022 Go to the issue