Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Computed Tomography

Building a dual-energy CT service line in abdominal radiology

Authors: Shanigarn Thiravit, Christina Brunnquell, Larry M. Cai, Mena Flemon, Achille Mileto

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

As the access of radiology practices to dual-energy CT (DECT) has increased worldwide, seamless integration into clinical workflows and optimized use of this technology are desirable. In this article, we provide basic concepts of commercially available DECT hardware implementations, discuss financial and logistical aspects, provide tips for protocol building and image routing strategies, and review radiation dose considerations to establish a DECT service line in abdominal imaging.

Key Points

• Tube-based and detector-based DECT implementations with varying features and strengths are available on the imaging market.
• Thorough assessment of financial and logistical aspects is key to successful implementation of a DECT service line.
• Optimized protocol building and image routing strategies are of critical importance for effective use and seamless inception of DECT in routine clinical workflows.
Literature
1.
Patel BN, Alexander L, Allen B et al (2017) Dual-energy CT workflow: multi-institutional consensus on standardization of abdominopelvic MDCT protocols. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:676–687
2.
Morgan DE (2018) The role of dual-energy computed tomography in assessment of abdominal oncology and beyond. Radiol Clin North Am 56:565–585PubMed
3.
Toia GV, Kim S, Dighe MK, Mileto A (2018) Dual-energy computed tomography in body imaging. Semin Roentgenol 53:132–146PubMed
4.
Kaza RK, Platt JF (2016) Renal applications of dual-energy CT. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41:1122–1132
5.
Vernuccio F, Meyer M, Mileto A, Marin D (2018) Use of dual-energy computed tomography for evaluation of genitourinary diseases. Urol Clin North Am 45:297–310PubMed
6.
Marin D, Boll DT, Mileto A, Nelson RC (2014) State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen. Radiology 271:327–342PubMed
7.
McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG (2015) Dual- and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology 276:637–653PubMed
8.
McCollough CH, Boedeker K, Cody D et al (2020) Principles and applications of multienergy CT: report of AAPM Task Group 291. Med Phys 47:e881–e912PubMed
9.
Niu ZF, Chen J, Ren H, Wang Y, Tao XW, Zhan K (2019) Comparison of image quality between split-filter twin beam dual energy and single energy images in abdominal CT. Eur J Radiol 121:108702PubMed
10.
Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G (2000) Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 217:430–435PubMed
11.
Park C, Choo KS, Kim JH, Nam KJ, Lee JW, Kim JY (2019) Image quality and radiation dose in CT venography using model-based iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V at 70 kVp. Korean J Radiol 20:1167–1175PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F et al (2020) Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 30:3951–3395PubMed
13.
Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu LF (2019) State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms. Radiology 293:491–503PubMed
14.
Graser A, Johnson TR, Chandarana H, Macari M (2009) Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol 19:13–23PubMed
15.
Baliyan V, Kordbacheh H, Serrao J, Sahani DV, Kambadakone AR (2018) Dual-source dual-energy CT portal venous phase abdominal CT scans in large body habitus patients: preliminary observations on image quality and material decomposition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 42:932–936PubMed
16.
Rassouli N, Etesami M, Dhanantwari A, Rajiah P (2017) Detector-based spectral CT with a novel dual-layer technology: principles and applications. Insights Imaging 8:589–598PubMedCentralPubMed
17.
Leng S, Bruesewitz M, Tao SZ et al (2019) Photon-counting detector CT: system design and clinical applications of an emerging technology. Radiographics 39:729–743PubMed
18.
19.
Ding A, Eisenberg JD, Pandharipande PV (2011) The economic burden of incidentally detected findings. Radiol Clin North Am 49:257–265PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Liu W, Mortelé KJ, Silverman SG (2005) Incidental extraurinary findings at MDCT urography in patients with hematuria: prevalence and impact on imaging costs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1051–1056PubMed
21.
22.
Atwi NE, Sabottke CF, Pitre DM et al (2020) Follow-up recommendation rates associated with spectral detector dual-energy CT of the abdomen and pelvis: a retrospective comparison to single-energy CT. J Am Coll Radiol 17:940–950PubMed
23.
24.
Itani M, Bresnahan BW, Rice K et al (2019) Clinical and payer-based analysis of value of dual-energy computed tomography for workup of incidental abdominal findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 43:605–611PubMed
25.
Wortman JR, Shyu JY, Fulwadhva UP, Sodickson AD (2019) Impact analysis of the routine use of dual-energy computed tomography for characterization of incidental renal lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 43:176–182PubMed
26.
Megibow AJ, Sahani DV (2012) Best practice: implementation and use of abdominal dual-energy CT in routine patient care. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:S71–S77PubMed
27.
Aran S, Daftari Besheli L, Karcaaltincaba M, Gupta R, Flores EJ, Abujudeh HH (2014) Applications of dual-energy CT in emergency radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:314–324
28.
29.
Matsumoto K, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, Ueno A, Yamada M, Kuribayashi S (2011) Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. Radiology 259:257–262PubMed
30.
Zhang D, Li X, Liu B (2011) Objective characterization of GE discovery CT750 HD scanner: gemstone spectral imaging mode. Med Phys 38:1178–1188PubMed
31.
Yu L, Primak AN, Liu X, McCollough CH (2009) Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. Med Phys 36:1019–1024PubMedCentralPubMed
32.
Euler A, Obmann MM, Szucs-Farkas Z et al (2018) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT. Eur Radiol 28:3405–3412PubMed
33.
Li S, Wang C, Jiang X, Xu G (2014) Effects of dual-energy CT with non-linear blending on abdominal CT angiography. Korean J Radiol 15:430–438PubMedCentralPubMed
34.
35.
Hojjati M, Van Hedent S, Rassouli N et al (2017) Quality of routine diagnostic abdominal images generated from a novel detector-based spectral CT scanner: a technical report on a phantom and clinical study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2752–2759
36.
Symons R, Choi Y, Cork TE et al (2018) Optimized energy of spectral coronary CT angiography for coronary plaque detection and quantification. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12:108–114PubMed
37.
Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Martin SS et al (2019) Review of clinical applications for virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT. Radiology 293:260–271PubMed
38.
Yu LF, Leng S, McCollough CH (2012) Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:S9–S15PubMed
39.
Megibow AJ, Kambadakone A, Ananthakrishnan L (2018) Dual-energy computed tomography image acquisition, processing, and workflow. Radiol Clin North Am 56:507–520PubMed
40.
Patino M, Prochowski A, Agrawal MD et al (2016) Material separation using dual-energy CT: current and emerging applications. Radiographics 36:1087–1105PubMed
41.
Marin D, Davis D, Roy Choudhury K et al (2017) Characterization of small focal renal lesions: diagnostic accuracy with single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT with material attenuation analysis compared with conventional attenuation measurements. Radiology 284:737–747PubMed
42.
Schabel C, Patel B, Harring S et al (2018) Renal lesion characterization with spectral CT: determining the optimal energy for virtual monoenergetic reconstruction. Radiology 287:874–883PubMed
43.
Mileto A, Nelson RC, Samei E et al (2014) Impact of dual-energy multi–detector row CT with virtual monochromatic imaging on renal cyst pseudoenhancement: in vitro and in vivo study. Radiology 272:767–776PubMed
44.
Pourvaziri A, Parakh A, Mojtahed A, Kambadakone A, Sahani DV (2019) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization. Eur Radiol 29:6559–6570PubMed
45.
Barrett T, Bowden DJ, Shaida N et al (2012) Virtual unenhanced second generation dual-source CT of the liver: is it time to discard the conventional unenhanced phase? Eur J Radiol 81:1438–1445PubMed
46.
Wortman JR, Sodickson AD (2018) Pearls, pitfalls, and problems in dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the body. Radiol Clin North Am 56:625–640PubMed
47.
Yao Y, Ng JM, Megibow AJ, Pelc NJ (2016) Image quality comparison between single energy and dual energy CT protocols for hepatic imaging. Med Phys 43:4877PubMed
48.
Purysko AS, Primak AN, Baker ME et al (2014) Comparison of radiation dose and image quality from single-energy and dual-energy CT examinations in the same patients screened for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Radiol 69:e538–e544PubMed
49.
Nagayama Y, Nakaura T, Oda S et al (2018) Dual-layer detector CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis with a one-third iodine dose: image quality, radiation dose, and optimal monoenergetic settings. Clin Radiol 73:1058.e21–1058.e29
50.
Uhrig M, Simons D, Kachelriess M, Pisana F, Kuchenbecker S, Schlemmer HP (2016) Advanced abdominal imaging with dual energy CT is feasible without increasing radiation dose. Cancer Imaging 16:15PubMedCentralPubMed
51.
Lenga L, Trapp F, Albrecht MH et al (2019) Single- and dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography using second- and third-generation dual-source CT systems: comparison of radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 29:4603–4612PubMed
52.
Topcuoglu OM, Sarikaya B (2019) Fast kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT offering lower x-ray dose than single-energy CT for the chest: a quantitative and qualitative comparison study of the two methods of acquisition. Diagn Interv Radiol 25:204–209PubMedCentralPubMed
53.
Leyendecker P, Faucher V, Labani A et al (2019) Prospective evaluation of ultra-low-dose contrast-enhanced 100-kV abdominal computed tomography with tin filter: effect on radiation dose reduction and image quality with a third-generation dual-source CT system. Eur Radiol 29:2107–2116PubMed
54.
Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL (2017) U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284:120–133
55.
Graser A, Becker CR, Staehler M et al (2010) Single-phase dual-energy CT allows for characterization of renal masses as benign or malignant. Invest Radiol 45:399–405PubMed
56.
Jamali S, Michoux N, Coche E, Dragean CA (2019) Virtual unenhanced phase with spectral dual-energy CT: is it an alternative to conventional true unenhanced phase for abdominal tissues? Diagn Interv Imaging 100:503–511PubMed
57.
Graser A, Johnson TRC, Hecht EM et al (2009) Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology 252:433–440PubMed
58.
Mileto A, Nelson RC, Larson DG et al (2017) Variability in radiation dose from repeat identical CT examinations: longitudinal analysis of 2851 patients undergoing 12,635 thoracoabdominal CT scans in an academic health system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:1278–1289
59.
Ascenti G, Mileto A, Gaeta M, Blandino A, Mazziotti S, Scribano E (2013) Single-phase dual-energy CT urography in the evaluation of haematuria. Clin Radiol 68:E87–E94PubMed
60.
Manoharan D, Sharma S, Das CJ, Kumar R, Singh G, Kumar P (2018) Single-acquisition triple-bolus dual-energy CT protocol for comprehensive evaluation of renal masses: a single-center randomized noninferiority trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:W22–W32PubMed
Metadata
Title
Building a dual-energy CT service line in abdominal radiology
Authors
Shanigarn Thiravit
Christina Brunnquell
Larry M. Cai
Mena Flemon
Achille Mileto
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07441-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

European Radiology 6/2021 Go to the issue

Vascular-Interventional

Mesenteric artery calcium scoring: a potential screening method for chronic mesenteric ischemia

Cardiac

Machine learning in cardiovascular radiology: ESCR position statement on design requirements, quality assessment, current applications, opportunities, and challenges

Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MRI texture signature as predictive biomarkers of immunophenotyping and survival

Correction

Correction to: CT and clinical assessment in asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients with early SARS-CoV-2 in outbreak settings

Computed Tomography

Operator’s eye lens dose in computed tomography–guided interventions

Chest

Evaluation of a novel deep learning–based classifier for perifissural nodules