Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Tuberculosis | Computed Tomography

Solitary solid pulmonary nodules: a CT-based deep learning nomogram helps differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas

Authors: Bao Feng, XiangMeng Chen, YeHang Chen, SenLiang Lu, KunFeng Liu, KunWei Li, ZhuangSheng Liu, YiXiu Hao, Zhi Li, ZhiBin Zhu, Nan Yao, GuangYuan Liang, JiaYu Zhang, WanSheng Long, XueGuo Liu

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the differential diagnostic performance of a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning nomogram (DLN) in identifying tuberculous granuloma (TBG) and lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) presenting as solitary solid pulmonary nodules (SSPNs).

Methods

Routine CT images of 550 patients with SSPNs were retrospectively obtained from two centers. A convolutional neural network was used to extract deep learning features from all lesions. The training set consisted of data for 218 patients. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to create a deep learning signature (DLS). Clinical factors and CT-based subjective findings were combined in a clinical model. An individualized DLN incorporating DLS, clinical factors, and CT-based subjective findings was constructed to validate the diagnostic ability. The performance of the DLN was assessed by discrimination and calibration using internal (n = 140) and external validation cohorts (n = 192).

Results

DLS, gender, age, and lobulated shape were found to be independent predictors and were used to build the DLN. The combination showed better diagnostic accuracy than any single model evaluated using the net reclassification improvement method (p < 0.05). The areas under the curve in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts were 0.889 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.839–0.927), 0.879 (95% CI, 0.813–0.928), and 0.809 (95% CI, 0.746–0.862), respectively. Decision curve analysis and stratification analysis showed that the DLN has potential generalization ability.

Conclusions

The CT-based DLN can preoperatively distinguish between LAC and TBG in patients presenting with SSPNs.

Key Points

• The deep learning nomogram was developed to preoperatively differentiate TBG from LAC in patients with SSPNs.
• The performance of the deep learning feature was superior to that of the radiomics feature.
• The deep learning nomogram achieved superior performance compared to the deep learning signature, the radiomics signature, or the clinical model alone.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Henschke CI, Salvatore M, Cham M et al (2018) Baseline and annual repeat rounds of screening: implications for optimal regimens of screening. Eur Radiol 28(3):1085–1094CrossRefPubMedCentral Henschke CI, Salvatore M, Cham M et al (2018) Baseline and annual repeat rounds of screening: implications for optimal regimens of screening. Eur Radiol 28(3):1085–1094CrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH (2003) Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 348(25):2535–2542CrossRef Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH (2003) Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 348(25):2535–2542CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wan Q, Deng YS, Lei Q et al (2019) Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging? Eur Radiol 29(3):1607–1615CrossRefPubMedCentral Wan Q, Deng YS, Lei Q et al (2019) Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging? Eur Radiol 29(3):1607–1615CrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Pretto MM, Alves BM, De MFPN et al (2016) Solitary pulmonary nodule and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Part 1: epidemiology, morphological evaluation and cancer probability. Radiol Bras 49(1):35–42CrossRef Pretto MM, Alves BM, De MFPN et al (2016) Solitary pulmonary nodule and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Part 1: epidemiology, morphological evaluation and cancer probability. Radiol Bras 49(1):35–42CrossRef
6.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284(1):228–243CrossRef MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284(1):228–243CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Patel VK, Naik SK, Naidich DP et al (2013) A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules part 2: pretest probability and algorithm. Chest 143(3):825–839CrossRef Patel VK, Naik SK, Naidich DP et al (2013) A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules part 2: pretest probability and algorithm. Chest 143(3):825–839CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Starnes SL, Reed MF, Meyer CA et al (2011) Can lung cancer screening by computed tomography be effective in areas with endemic histoplasmosis? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(3):688–693CrossRef Starnes SL, Reed MF, Meyer CA et al (2011) Can lung cancer screening by computed tomography be effective in areas with endemic histoplasmosis? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(3):688–693CrossRef
9.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400CrossRef MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Winer-Muram HT (2006) The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology 239(1):34–49CrossRef Winer-Muram HT (2006) The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology 239(1):34–49CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brandman S, Ko JP (2011) Pulmonary nodule detection, characterization, and management with multi-detector computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 26(2):90–105CrossRef Brandman S, Ko JP (2011) Pulmonary nodule detection, characterization, and management with multi-detector computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 26(2):90–105CrossRef
13.
go back to reference He L, Huang Y, Ma Z, Liang C, Liang C, Liu Z (2016) Effects of contrast-enhancement, reconstruction slice thickness and convolution kernel on the diagnostic performance of radiomics signature in solitary pulmonary nodule. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34921 He L, Huang Y, Ma Z, Liang C, Liang C, Liu Z (2016) Effects of contrast-enhancement, reconstruction slice thickness and convolution kernel on the diagnostic performance of radiomics signature in solitary pulmonary nodule. Sci Rep. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​srep34921
16.
go back to reference Tu W, Li Z, Wang Y et al (2019) The “solid” component within subsolid nodules: imaging definition, display, and correlation with invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma, a comparison of CT histograms and subjective evaluation. Eur Radiol 29(4):1703–1713CrossRef Tu W, Li Z, Wang Y et al (2019) The “solid” component within subsolid nodules: imaging definition, display, and correlation with invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma, a comparison of CT histograms and subjective evaluation. Eur Radiol 29(4):1703–1713CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Poplin R, Varadarajan AV, Blumer K et al (2018) Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng 2(3):158–164CrossRef Poplin R, Varadarajan AV, Blumer K et al (2018) Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng 2(3):158–164CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA et al (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118CrossRef Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA et al (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ting DSW, Cheung CY-L, Lim G et al (2017) Development and validation of a deep learning system for diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases using retinal images from multiethnic populations with diabetes. JAMA 318(22):2211–2223CrossRefPubMedCentral Ting DSW, Cheung CY-L, Lim G et al (2017) Development and validation of a deep learning system for diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases using retinal images from multiethnic populations with diabetes. JAMA 318(22):2211–2223CrossRefPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Lakhani P, Sundaram B (2017) Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 284(2):574–582CrossRef Lakhani P, Sundaram B (2017) Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 284(2):574–582CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wang S, Zhou M, Liu Z et al (2017) Central focused convolutional neural networks: developing a data-driven model for lung nodule segmentation. Med Image Anal 40:172–183CrossRefPubMedCentral Wang S, Zhou M, Liu Z et al (2017) Central focused convolutional neural networks: developing a data-driven model for lung nodule segmentation. Med Image Anal 40:172–183CrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference De Jay N, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Olsen C, El-Hachem N, Bontempi G, Haibe-Kains B (2013) mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selection. Bioinformatics 29(18):2365–2368CrossRef De Jay N, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Olsen C, El-Hachem N, Bontempi G, Haibe-Kains B (2013) mRMRe: an R package for parallelized mRMR ensemble feature selection. Bioinformatics 29(18):2365–2368CrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Xu DM, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH et al (2008) Limited value of shape, margin and CT density in the discrimination between benign and malignant screen detected solid pulmonary nodules of the NELSON trial. Eur J Radiol 68(2):347–352CrossRef Xu DM, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH et al (2008) Limited value of shape, margin and CT density in the discrimination between benign and malignant screen detected solid pulmonary nodules of the NELSON trial. Eur J Radiol 68(2):347–352CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Solitary solid pulmonary nodules: a CT-based deep learning nomogram helps differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas
Authors
Bao Feng
XiangMeng Chen
YeHang Chen
SenLiang Lu
KunFeng Liu
KunWei Li
ZhuangSheng Liu
YiXiu Hao
Zhi Li
ZhiBin Zhu
Nan Yao
GuangYuan Liang
JiaYu Zhang
WanSheng Long
XueGuo Liu
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07024-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

European Radiology 12/2020 Go to the issue