Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Computed Tomography | Gastrointestinal

Routinely staging gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery

Authors: John M. Findlay, Stefan Antonowicz, Ashvina Segaran, Jihene el Kafsi, Alexa Zhang, Kevin M. Bradley, Richard S. Gillies, Nicholas D. Maynard, Mark R. Middleton

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) is typically considered to have minimal yield in gastric cancer, and so is not consistently recommended by international guidelines. However, its yield is considerable in esophageal and junctional cancer, identifying unsuspected metastases and risk-stratifying patients using metabolic nodal stage (mN). We aimed to determine the contemporary utility of routine 18F-FDG PET-CT in gastric cancer.

Methods

We routinely stage patients with non-junctional gastric cancer with PET-CT, provided initial CT does not demonstrate unequivocal metastases. We performed a retrospective study of all such patients staged in our institution from January 2007 to July 2016. Our primary endpoint was detection of incurable disease. Our secondary endpoint was disease-free survival following gastrectomy. Decision theory, economic, and predictive models were generated.

Results

The primary tumor was FDG-avid in 225/279 patients (80.6%). Seventy-two (25.8%) had FDG-avid nodes (resectable by D2 lymphadenectomy). This was not influenced by the Lauren classification. Unsuspected metastases were identified in 20 patients (7.2%). In 13 (4.7%), these would not have been otherwise identified. Decision theory and economic modeling supported routine PET-CT. Patients with FDG-avid nodes were more likely to have incurable disease (51.4% versus 15.5%; p < 0.001), and a worse prognosis if not: multivariate hazard ratio 2.19 (1.23–3.91; p = 0.008). Prognosis worsened with mN stage.

Conclusions

PET-CT appears useful when used routinely for non-junctional gastric cancer, and should be considered in international recommendations. Any extra costs appear small and offset by avoiding futile investigations and radical treatment. mN stage identifies patients at risk of early recurrence and death.

Key Points

• PET-CT is typically not considered useful when staging gastric cancer. We describe a retrospective study of 279 patients routinely staged with PET-CT in the absence of metastases on CT.
• The primary tumor was avid in 80% of patients. Twenty-five percent had resectable avid nodes. PET-CT identified previously unsuspected metastases in 7% of patients, which would likely not have been identified by conventional staging without PET-CT in 5%. These patients were much more likely to have avid nodes.
• Beyond avoiding futile investigations and radical treatment in this 5%, we found patients with FDG-avid nodes (metabolic nodal stage, mN) to have a worse disease-free survival after gastrectomy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blencowe NS, Whistance RN, Strong S et al (2013) Evaluating the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in multi-disciplinary team recommendations for oesophago-gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 109:1445–1450CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blencowe NS, Whistance RN, Strong S et al (2013) Evaluating the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in multi-disciplinary team recommendations for oesophago-gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 109:1445–1450CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al (2016) Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38–v49CrossRefPubMed Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al (2016) Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38–v49CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM et al (2011) Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 60:1449–1472CrossRefPubMed Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM et al (2011) Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 60:1449–1472CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Metabolic nodal response as a prognostic marker after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 104:947CrossRefPubMed Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Metabolic nodal response as a prognostic marker after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 104:947CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Predicting pathologic response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the implications of metabolic nodal response for personalized therapy. J Nucl Med 58:266–275CrossRefPubMed Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Predicting pathologic response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the implications of metabolic nodal response for personalized therapy. J Nucl Med 58:266–275CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Song BI, Kim HW, Won KS, Ryu SW, Sohn SS, Kang YN (2015) Preoperative standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1037CrossRef Song BI, Kim HW, Won KS, Ryu SW, Sohn SS, Kang YN (2015) Preoperative standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1037CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wang X, Wei Y, Xue Y, Lu P, Yu L, Shen B (2016) Predictive role of the number of 18F-FDG-positive lymph nodes detected by PET/CT for pre-treatment evaluation of locally advanced gastric cancer. PLoS One 11:e0166836CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang X, Wei Y, Xue Y, Lu P, Yu L, Shen B (2016) Predictive role of the number of 18F-FDG-positive lymph nodes detected by PET/CT for pre-treatment evaluation of locally advanced gastric cancer. PLoS One 11:e0166836CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Neri A, Marrelli D, Voglino C et al (2016) Recurrence after surgery in esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: current management and future perspectives. Surg Oncol 25:355–363CrossRefPubMed Neri A, Marrelli D, Voglino C et al (2016) Recurrence after surgery in esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: current management and future perspectives. Surg Oncol 25:355–363CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2003) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edition. Wiley-Liss, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2003) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edition. Wiley-Liss, New York
12.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Franklin JM et al (2016) Restaging oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy with (18)F-FDG PET-CT: identifying interval metastases and predicting incurable disease at surgery. Eur Radiol 26:3519–3533CrossRefPubMed Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Franklin JM et al (2016) Restaging oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy with (18)F-FDG PET-CT: identifying interval metastases and predicting incurable disease at surgery. Eur Radiol 26:3519–3533CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a Histo-Clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49CrossRefPubMed Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a Histo-Clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686CrossRefPubMed Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
18.
go back to reference Pauker SG, Kassirer JP (1980) The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 302:1109–1117CrossRefPubMed Pauker SG, Kassirer JP (1980) The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 302:1109–1117CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lemaire A, Nikolic I, Petersen T et al (2006) Nine-year single center experience with cervical mediastinoscopy: complications and false negative rate. Ann Thorac Surg 82:1185–1189 discussion 1189-1190CrossRefPubMed Lemaire A, Nikolic I, Petersen T et al (2006) Nine-year single center experience with cervical mediastinoscopy: complications and false negative rate. Ann Thorac Surg 82:1185–1189 discussion 1189-1190CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
22.
go back to reference Chen J, Cheong JH, Yun MJ et al (2005) Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography. Cancer 103:2383–2390CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Cheong JH, Yun MJ et al (2005) Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography. Cancer 103:2383–2390CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Smyth E, Schöder H, Strong VE et al (2012) A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 118:5481–5488CrossRefPubMed Smyth E, Schöder H, Strong VE et al (2012) A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 118:5481–5488CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Coupe NA, Karikios D, Chong S et al (2014) Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer. Ann Nucl Med 28:128–135CrossRefPubMed Coupe NA, Karikios D, Chong S et al (2014) Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer. Ann Nucl Med 28:128–135CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Routinely staging gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery
Authors
John M. Findlay
Stefan Antonowicz
Ashvina Segaran
Jihene el Kafsi
Alexa Zhang
Kevin M. Bradley
Richard S. Gillies
Nicholas D. Maynard
Mark R. Middleton
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5904-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

European Radiology 5/2019 Go to the issue