Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Musculoskeletal

Psoas proximal insertion as a simple and reliable landmark for numbering lumbar vertebrae on MRI of the lumbar spine

Authors: François Ropars, J. Mesrar, J. Ognard, S. Querellou, J. Rousset, M. Garetier

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the value of psoas muscle proximal insertion for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in MRI, in particular in case of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV).

Methods

Two radiologists assessed 477 MRI scans of the lumbar spine with a sagittal localizer sequence on the whole spine for numbering vertebrae caudally from C2. Proximal insertion of the psoas was determined as the most proximal vertebra with psoas over half of its body on coronal T2 STIR sequence. The last lumbar vertebra was named considering both its number and the presence or absence of LSTV according to Castellvi classification. These same parameters were also assessed on 207 PET-CT scans of another cohort including the whole spine.

Results

Proximal insertion of the psoas was L1 in 94.1% of cases: 98.5% in case of modal anatomy, 81.4% in case of LSTV, and 51.7% in case of missing or supernumerary lumbar vertebra without LSTV. There was no statistically significant difference between MRI and CT data. The inter-reader agreement for determination of psoas proximal insertion was excellent (kappa = 0.96).

Conclusion

Proximal insertion of the psoas muscle is a helpful marker for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in MRI and to detect a complete lumbosacral segmentation anomaly.

Key Points

• Proximal insertion of the psoas muscle can be easily identified on a coronal T2 STIR sequence.
• Psoas proximal insertion on the spine almost always designates the first lumbar vertebra and is helpful to accurately number all lumbar vertebrae, especially in case of lumbosacral transitional vertebra.
• Conversely, when psoas muscle does not insert five lumbar bodies above the apparent lumbosacral joint, the probability of variation in the number of lumbar vertebrae is high.
Literature
1.
Malanga GA, Cooke PM (2004) Segmental anomaly leading to wrong level disc surgery in cauda equina syndrome. Pain Physician 7:107–110PubMed
2.
Konin GP, Walz DM (2010) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1778–1786CrossRefPubMed
3.
Paik NC, Lim CS, Jang HS (2013) Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E573–E578CrossRef
4.
Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP (1984) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:493–495CrossRef
5.
Apazidis A, Ricart PA, Diefenbach CM, Spivak JM (2011) The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J 11:858–862CrossRefPubMed
6.
Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A (2004) Imaging of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Clin Radiol 59:984–991CrossRef
7.
Paik NC, Lim CS, Jang HS (2012) Numbering of vertebrae on MRI using a PACS cross-referencing tool. Acta Radiol 53:785–789CrossRefPubMed
8.
Akbar JJ, Weiss KL, Saafir MA, Weiss JL (2010) Rapid MRI detection of vertebral numeric variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:465–466CrossRefPubMed
9.
Lee CH, Seo BK, Choi YC et al (2005) Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1295–1300CrossRef
10.
Tokgoz N, Ucar M, Erdogan AB, Kilic K, Ozcan C (2014) Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae? Korean J Radiol 15:258–266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Farshad-Amacker NA, Aichmair A, Herzog RJ, Farshad M (2015) Merits of different anatomical landmarks for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Eur Spine J 24:600–608CrossRefPubMed
12.
Carrino JA, Campbell PD Jr, Lin DC et al (2011) Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 259:196–202
13.
Nakajima A, Usui A, Hosokai Y et al (2014) The prevalence of morphological changes in the thoracolumbar spine on whole-spine computed tomographic images. Insights Imaging 5:77–83CrossRefPubMed
14.
Farshad-Amacker NA, Lurie B, Herzog RJ, Farshad M (2014) Is the iliolumbar ligament a reliable identifier of the L5 vertebra in lumbosacral transitional anomalies? Eur Radiol 24:2623–2630CrossRefPubMed
15.
O’Driscoll CM, Irwin A, Saifuddin A (1996) Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography. Skeletal Radiol 25:225–230CrossRefPubMed
16.
Wigh RE (1980) The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5:215–222CrossRef
17.
Kershenovich A, Macias OM, Syed F, Davenport C, Moore GJ, Lock JH (2016) Conus medullaris level in vertebral columns with lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Neurosurgery 78:62–70CrossRefPubMed
18.
Lee CH, Seo BK, Choi YC et al (2004) Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1295–1300CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lee CH, Park CM, Kim KA et al (2007) Identification and prediction of transitional vertebrae on imaging studies: anatomical significance of paraspinal structures. Clin Anat 20:905–914CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hanson EH, Mishra RK, Chang DS et al (2010) Sagittal whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in 750 consecutive outpatients: accurate determination of the number of lumbar vertebral bodies: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 12:47–55CrossRefPubMed
21.
Farshad-Amacker NA, Lurie B, Herzog RJ, Farshad M (2014) Interreader and intermodality reliability of standard anteroposterior radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and classification of lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Spine J 14:1470–1475CrossRefPubMed
22.
Hsieh CY, Vanderford JD, Moreau SR, Prong T (2000) Lumbosacral transitional segments: classification, prevalence, and effect on disk height. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 23:483–489CrossRefPubMed
23.
Tertti MO, Salminen JJ, Paajanen HE, Terho PH, Kormano MJ (1991) Low-back pain and disk degeneration in children: a case-control MR imaging study. Radiology 180:503–507CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Le Double AF (1897) Treaty about variations of the human muscular system [in French]. Schleicher Frères, Paris
26.
Laporte C, Albert JD, Duvauferrier R, Bertaud V, Gouillou M, Guillin R (2014) MRI investigation of radiating pain in the lower limbs: value of an additional sequence dedicated to the lumbosacral plexus and pelvic girdle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1280–1285CrossRefPubMed
27.
Tureli D, Ekinci G, Baltacioglu F (2014) Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers. Clin Imaging 38:792–796CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Psoas proximal insertion as a simple and reliable landmark for numbering lumbar vertebrae on MRI of the lumbar spine
Authors
François Ropars
J. Mesrar
J. Ognard
S. Querellou
J. Rousset
M. Garetier
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5798-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

European Radiology 5/2019 Go to the issue

Breast

Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis

Cardiac

Microvascular obstruction extent predicts major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction

Cardiac

Coronary CT angiography–derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia

Cardiac

Evaluation of elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with preserved ejection fraction using cardiac magnetic resonance

Gastrointestinal

Routinely staging gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery

Obituary

Obituary for professor Ian Isherwood