Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Computed Tomography

Head CT: Image quality improvement of posterior fossa and radiation dose reduction with ASiR - comparative studies of CT head examinations

Authors: Maciej Guziński, Łukasz Waszczuk, Marek J. Sąsiadek

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate head CT protocol developed to improve visibility of the brainstem and cerebellum, lower bone-related artefacts in the posterior fossa and maintain patient radioprotection.

Methods

A paired comparison of head CT performed without Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASiR) and a clinically indicated follow-up with 40 % ASiR was acquired in one group of 55 patients. Patients were scanned in the axial mode with different scanner settings for the brain and the posterior fossa. Objective image quality analysis was performed with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality analysis was based on brain structure visibility and evaluation of the artefacts.

Results

We achieved 19 % reduction of total DLP and significantly better image quality of posterior fossa structures. SNR for white and grey matter in the cerebellum were 34 % to 36 % higher, respectively, CNR was improved by 142 % and subjective analyses were better for images with ASiR.

Conclusions

When imaging parameters are set independently for the brain and the posterior fossa imaging, ASiR has a great potential to improve CT performance: image quality of the brainstem and cerebellum is improved, and radiation dose for the brain as well as total radiation dose are reduced.

Key Points

•With ASiR it is possible to lower radiation dose or improve image quality
•Sequentional imaging allows setting scan parameters for brain and posterior-fossa independently
•We improved visibility of brainstem structures and decreased radiation dose
•Total radiation dose (DLP) was decreased by 19 %
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources: 1950-2007. Radiology 253:520–531CrossRefPubMed Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources: 1950-2007. Radiology 253:520–531CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199CrossRefPubMed Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771CrossRefPubMed Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B (2011) Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1578–1582CrossRefPubMed Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B (2011) Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1578–1582CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Kamalian S et al (2012) Cranial CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:609–615CrossRefPubMed Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Kamalian S et al (2012) Cranial CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:609–615CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Komlosi P, Zhang Y, Leiva-Salinas C et al (2014) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces patient radiation dose in neuroradiology CT studies. Neuroradiology 56:187–193CrossRefPubMed Komlosi P, Zhang Y, Leiva-Salinas C et al (2014) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces patient radiation dose in neuroradiology CT studies. Neuroradiology 56:187–193CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:205–211CrossRefPubMed Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:205–211CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference European Commission. EUR 16262 EN (2000) European guidelines for quality criteria for computed tomography. European Commission, Luxembourg European Commission. EUR 16262 EN (2000) European guidelines for quality criteria for computed tomography. European Commission, Luxembourg
12.
go back to reference R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
13.
go back to reference Hsieh J, Nett B, Yu Z, Sauer K, Thibault JB, Bouman CA (2013) Recent Advances in CT Image Reconstruction. Curr Radiol Rep 1:39–51CrossRef Hsieh J, Nett B, Yu Z, Sauer K, Thibault JB, Bouman CA (2013) Recent Advances in CT Image Reconstruction. Curr Radiol Rep 1:39–51CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rozeik C, Kotterer O, Preiss J, Schütz M, Dingler W, Deininger HK (1991) Cranial CT artifacts and gantry angulation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:381–386CrossRefPubMed Rozeik C, Kotterer O, Preiss J, Schütz M, Dingler W, Deininger HK (1991) Cranial CT artifacts and gantry angulation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:381–386CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Alberico RA, Loud P, Pollina J, Greco W, Patel M, Klufas R (2000) Thick-section reformatting of thinly collimated helical CT for reduction of skull base-related artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1361–6 Alberico RA, Loud P, Pollina J, Greco W, Patel M, Klufas R (2000) Thick-section reformatting of thinly collimated helical CT for reduction of skull base-related artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1361–6
17.
go back to reference Ren Q, Dewan SK, Li M (2012) Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in brain CT. Eur J Radiol 81:2597–2601CrossRefPubMed Ren Q, Dewan SK, Li M (2012) Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in brain CT. Eur J Radiol 81:2597–2601CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kalender WA (2005) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. 2nd revised ed. Publicis Corporate, Erlangen Kalender WA (2005) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. 2nd revised ed. Publicis Corporate, Erlangen
19.
go back to reference Schilham A, van der Molen AJ, Prokop M, de Jong HW (2010) Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure. Radiographics 30:1057–1067CrossRefPubMed Schilham A, van der Molen AJ, Prokop M, de Jong HW (2010) Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure. Radiographics 30:1057–1067CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose: comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242:208–216CrossRefPubMed van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose: comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242:208–216CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Löve A, Olsson ML, Siemund R, Stålhammar F, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Söderberg M (2013) Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol 86:1031–1040CrossRef Löve A, Olsson ML, Siemund R, Stålhammar F, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Söderberg M (2013) Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol 86:1031–1040CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schindera ST, Odedra D, Raza SA (2013) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? Radiology 269:511–518CrossRefPubMed Schindera ST, Odedra D, Raza SA (2013) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? Radiology 269:511–518CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Brady SL, Moore BM, Yee BS, Kaufman RA (2014) Pediatric CT: implementation of ASiR for substantial radiation dose reduction while maintaining pre-ASiR image noise. Radiology 270:223–231CrossRefPubMed Brady SL, Moore BM, Yee BS, Kaufman RA (2014) Pediatric CT: implementation of ASiR for substantial radiation dose reduction while maintaining pre-ASiR image noise. Radiology 270:223–231CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Willemink MJ, Takx RA, de Jong PA et al (2014) Computed tomography radiation dose reduction: effect of different iterative reconstruction algorithms on image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:815–823CrossRefPubMed Willemink MJ, Takx RA, de Jong PA et al (2014) Computed tomography radiation dose reduction: effect of different iterative reconstruction algorithms on image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:815–823CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Head CT: Image quality improvement of posterior fossa and radiation dose reduction with ASiR - comparative studies of CT head examinations
Authors
Maciej Guziński
Łukasz Waszczuk
Marek J. Sąsiadek
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4183-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

European Radiology 10/2016 Go to the issue