Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces patient radiation dose in neuroradiology CT studies

Authors: Peter Komlosi, Yanrong Zhang, Carlos Leiva-Salinas, David Ornan, James T. Patrie, Wenjun Xin, Deborah Grady, Max Wintermark

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) can decrease image noise, thereby generating CT images of comparable diagnostic quality with less radiation. The purpose of this study is to quantify the effect of systematic use of ASIR versus filtered back projection (FBP) for neuroradiology CT protocols on patients’ radiation dose and image quality.

Methods

We evaluated the effect of ASIR on six types of neuroradiologic CT studies: adult and pediatric unenhanced head CT, adult cervical spine CT, adult cervical and intracranial CT angiography, adult soft tissue neck CT with contrast, and adult lumbar spine CT. For each type of CT study, two groups of 100 consecutive studies were retrospectively reviewed: 100 studies performed with FBP and 100 studies performed with ASIR/FBP blending factor of 40 %/60 % with appropriate noise indices. The weighted volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose–length product (DLP) and noise were recorded. Each study was also reviewed for image quality by two reviewers. Continuous and categorical variables were compared by t test and free permutation test, respectively.

Results

For adult unenhanced brain CT, CT cervical myelography, cervical and intracranial CT angiography and lumbar spine CT both CTDIvol and DLP were lowered by up to 10.9 % (p < 0.001), 17.9 % (p = 0.005), 20.9 % (p < 0.001), and 21.7 % (p = 0.001), respectively, by using ASIR compared with FBP alone. Image quality and noise were similar for both FBP and ASIR.

Conclusion

We recommend routine use of iterative reconstruction for neuroradiology CT examinations because this approach affords a significant dose reduction while preserving image quality.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from ct scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from ct scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC, Gould R, Verdun FR, Lopez EB et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction strategy for ct protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 247:499–506PubMedCrossRef Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC, Gould R, Verdun FR, Lopez EB et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction strategy for ct protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 247:499–506PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kulkarni NM, Uppot RN, Eisner BH, Sahani DV (2012) Radiation dose reduction at multidetector ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go? Radiology 265:158–166PubMedCrossRef Kulkarni NM, Uppot RN, Eisner BH, Sahani DV (2012) Radiation dose reduction at multidetector ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go? Radiology 265:158–166PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head ct: a feasibility study. Am J Neuroradiol 34:205–211PubMedCrossRef Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head ct: a feasibility study. Am J Neuroradiol 34:205–211PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Maxfield MW, Schuster KM, McGillicuddy EA, Young CJ, Ghita M, Bokhari SA et al (2012) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1406–1411PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Maxfield MW, Schuster KM, McGillicuddy EA, Young CJ, Ghita M, Bokhari SA et al (2012) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1406–1411PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B (2011) Lowering the dose in head ct using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1578–1582PubMedCrossRef Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B (2011) Lowering the dose in head ct using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1578–1582PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Kamalian S, Payabvash S, Souza LC, Zhang D et al (2012) Cranial ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:609–615PubMedCrossRef Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Kamalian S, Payabvash S, Souza LC, Zhang D et al (2012) Cranial ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:609–615PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row ct: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772PubMedCrossRef Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row ct: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran JP, Valley JF, Schnyder P et al (2000) Using 80 kvp versus 120 kvp in perfusion ct measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1881–1884PubMed Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran JP, Valley JF, Schnyder P et al (2000) Using 80 kvp versus 120 kvp in perfusion ct measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1881–1884PubMed
Metadata
Title
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces patient radiation dose in neuroradiology CT studies
Authors
Peter Komlosi
Yanrong Zhang
Carlos Leiva-Salinas
David Ornan
James T. Patrie
Wenjun Xin
Deborah Grady
Max Wintermark
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1313-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Neuroradiology 3/2014 Go to the issue