Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2012

Open Access 01-11-2012 | Interventional

3D cone-beam CT guidance, a novel technique in renal biopsy—results in 41 patients with suspected renal masses

Authors: Sicco J. Braak, Harm H. E. van Melick, Mircea G. Onaca, Johannes P. M. van Heesewijk, Marco J. L. van Strijen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance allows safe and accurate biopsy of suspected small renal masses (SRM), especially in hard-to-reach anatomical locations.

Materials and methods

CBCT guidance was used to perform 41 stereotactic biopsy procedures of lesions that were inaccessible for ultrasound guidance or CT guidance. In CBCT guidance, a 3D-volume data set is acquired by rotating a C-arm flat-panel detector angiosystem around the patient. In the data set, a needle trajectory is determined and, after co-registration, a fusion image is created from fluoroscopy and a slice from the data set, enabling the needle to be positioned in real time.

Results

Of the 41 lesions, 22 were malignant, 17 were benign, and 2 were nondiagnostic. The two nondiagnostic lesions proved to be renal cell carcinoma. There was no growth during follow-up imaging of the benign lesions (mean 29 months). This resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 91.7, 100, 100, 89.5, and 95.1%, respectively. Mean dose-area product value was 44.0 Gy·cm2 (range 16.5–126.5). There was one minor bleeding complication.

Conclusion

With CBCT guidance, safe and accurate biopsy of a suspected SRM is feasible, especially in hard-to-reach locations of the kidney.

Key Points

Cone-beam computed tomography has potential advantages over conventional CT for interventional procedures.
CBCT guidance incorporates 3D CBCT data, fluoroscopy, and guidance software.
In hard-to-reach renal masses, CBCT guidance offers an alternative biopsy method.
CBCT guidance offers good outcome and safety and has potential clinical significance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vasudevan A, Davies RJ, Shannon BA, Cohen RJ (2006) Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy. BJU Int 97:946–949PubMedCrossRef Vasudevan A, Davies RJ, Shannon BA, Cohen RJ (2006) Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy. BJU Int 97:946–949PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, Guillé F, Lobel B (2002) Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 90:358–363PubMedCrossRef Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, Guillé F, Lobel B (2002) Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 90:358–363PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma—age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56:58–62PubMedCrossRef Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma—age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56:58–62PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thompson RH, Kurta JM, Kaag M et al (2009) Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 181:2033–2036PubMedCrossRef Thompson RH, Kurta JM, Kaag M et al (2009) Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 181:2033–2036PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marinez-Pineiro L, Maestro MA (2010) Challenging the EAU guidelines: role of biopsy and management of small renal tumours. Eur Urol 9:450–453CrossRef Marinez-Pineiro L, Maestro MA (2010) Challenging the EAU guidelines: role of biopsy and management of small renal tumours. Eur Urol 9:450–453CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R et al (2007) Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W357–W364PubMedCrossRef Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R et al (2007) Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W357–W364PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Leersum M, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JPM (2010) Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W445–W451PubMedCrossRef Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Leersum M, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JPM (2010) Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W445–W451PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, Greenberg RE, Chen DYT, Uzzo RG (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175:425–431PubMedCrossRef Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, Greenberg RE, Chen DYT, Uzzo RG (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175:425–431PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kroeze SGC, Huisman M, Verkooijen HM, van Diest PJ, Bosch JLHR, van den Bosch MAAJ (2012) Real-time 3D fluoroscopy-guided large core needle biopsy of renal masses: a critical early evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:680–685. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0237-4 Kroeze SGC, Huisman M, Verkooijen HM, van Diest PJ, Bosch JLHR, van den Bosch MAAJ (2012) Real-time 3D fluoroscopy-guided large core needle biopsy of renal masses: a critical early evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:680–685. doi:10.​1007/​s00270-011-0237-4
10.
go back to reference Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR et al (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178:379–386PubMedCrossRef Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR et al (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178:379–386PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG (2003) Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1281–1287PubMed Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG (2003) Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1281–1287PubMed
12.
go back to reference Nadal L, Baumgartner BR, Bernardino ME (1986) Percutaneous renal biopsies: accuracy, safety, and indications. Urol Radiol 8:67–71CrossRef Nadal L, Baumgartner BR, Bernardino ME (1986) Percutaneous renal biopsies: accuracy, safety, and indications. Urol Radiol 8:67–71CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 53:1003–1012PubMedCrossRef Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 53:1003–1012PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Unn Gan Y, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES (2006) Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutanous biopsy. Radiology 240:6–22PubMedCrossRef Silverman SG, Unn Gan Y, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES (2006) Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutanous biopsy. Radiology 240:6–22PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lechevalier E, André M, Barriol D et al (2000) Fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance. Radiology 216:506–510 Lechevalier E, André M, Barriol D et al (2000) Fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance. Radiology 216:506–510
16.
go back to reference Lechevalier E (2007) Core biopsy of solid renal masses under CT guidance. Eur Urol 6:540–543CrossRef Lechevalier E (2007) Core biopsy of solid renal masses under CT guidance. Eur Urol 6:540–543CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shannon BA, Cohen RJ, de Bruto H, Davis RJ (2008) The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. J Urol 180:1257–1261PubMedCrossRef Shannon BA, Cohen RJ, de Bruto H, Davis RJ (2008) The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. J Urol 180:1257–1261PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sharma KV, Venkatesan AM, Swerdlow D et al (2010) Image-guided adrenal and renal biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 13:100–109PubMedCrossRef Sharma KV, Venkatesan AM, Swerdlow D et al (2010) Image-guided adrenal and renal biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 13:100–109PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hussain S (1996) Gantry angulation in CT-guided percutaneous adrenal biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:537–539PubMed Hussain S (1996) Gantry angulation in CT-guided percutaneous adrenal biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:537–539PubMed
20.
go back to reference vanSonnenberg E, Wittenberg J, Ferruci JT, Mueller PR, Simeone JF (1981) Triangulation method for percutaneous needle guidance: the angled approach to upper abdominal masses. AJRAm J Roentgenol 137:757–761 vanSonnenberg E, Wittenberg J, Ferruci JT, Mueller PR, Simeone JF (1981) Triangulation method for percutaneous needle guidance: the angled approach to upper abdominal masses. AJRAm J Roentgenol 137:757–761
21.
go back to reference Odisio BC, Tam AL, Avritscher R, Gupta S, Wallace MJ (2012) CT-guided adrenal biopsy: comparison of ipsilateral decubitus versus prone patient positioning for biopsy approach. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2363-4 Odisio BC, Tam AL, Avritscher R, Gupta S, Wallace MJ (2012) CT-guided adrenal biopsy: comparison of ipsilateral decubitus versus prone patient positioning for biopsy approach. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-011-2363-4
22.
go back to reference Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA et al (2008) MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol 18:2865–2873PubMedCrossRef Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA et al (2008) MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol 18:2865–2873PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kühn JP, Langner S, Hegenscheid K et al (2010) Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field wide-bore 3-T MRI system: feasibility, handling, and needle artifacts. Eur Radiol 20:2414–2421PubMedCrossRef Kühn JP, Langner S, Hegenscheid K et al (2010) Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field wide-bore 3-T MRI system: feasibility, handling, and needle artifacts. Eur Radiol 20:2414–2421PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamaguchi I et al (2009) Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional Imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system. Radiology 250:545–550PubMedCrossRef Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamaguchi I et al (2009) Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional Imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system. Radiology 250:545–550PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J (2007) CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1479–1484PubMedCrossRef Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J (2007) CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1479–1484PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Obermann WR, van Meerten EL Van Persijn (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74:720–726PubMed Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Obermann WR, van Meerten EL Van Persijn (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74:720–726PubMed
27.
go back to reference Joemai RMS, Zweers D, Obermann WR, Geleijns J (2009) Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:881–886PubMedCrossRef Joemai RMS, Zweers D, Obermann WR, Geleijns J (2009) Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:881–886PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 58:390–395PubMedCrossRef Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 58:390–395PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kolb LG, Velosa JA, Bergstralh EJ, Offord KP (1994) Percutaneous renal allograft biopsy a comparison of two neelde types and analysis of risk factors. Transplantation 57:1742–1746PubMed Kolb LG, Velosa JA, Bergstralh EJ, Offord KP (1994) Percutaneous renal allograft biopsy a comparison of two neelde types and analysis of risk factors. Transplantation 57:1742–1746PubMed
30.
Metadata
Title
3D cone-beam CT guidance, a novel technique in renal biopsy—results in 41 patients with suspected renal masses
Authors
Sicco J. Braak
Harm H. E. van Melick
Mircea G. Onaca
Johannes P. M. van Heesewijk
Marco J. L. van Strijen
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2498-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

European Radiology 11/2012 Go to the issue