Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging

Authors: Michael Soussan, Christophe Aubé, Stéphane Bahrami, Jérôme Boursier, Dominique Charles Valla, Valérie Vilgrain

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and MR imaging in incidental solid focal liver lesions not characterised on ultrasound.

Materials and methods

Forty-seven patients with 50 lesions underwent MR imaging and CEUS: 24 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH), 11 adenomas, 10 haemangiomas, 1 focal fatty change and 4 malignant lesions were identified. Two experienced radiologists randomly reviewed contrast-enhanced MR imaging and CEUS data, and provided the most likely diagnosis. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), likelihood ratios (LR) and kappa value were calculated.

Results

A histotype diagnosis was obtained in 66–52% with MR imaging and 52–53% with CEUS, respectively, for both readers. Se, Sp and LR for haemangioma were 100–100, 100–100 and 78–78 with MR imaging and 89–89, 100–100 and 68–70 with CEUS; for FNH with MR imaging they were 88–63, 96–100 and 23–34 and 74–67, 88–96 and 6–17 with CEUS. If the diagnosis of haemangioma was uncertain with CEUS, MR imaging always confirmed the diagnosis. If the diagnosis of FNH was uncertain with either CEUS or MR imaging, the other imaging technique confirmed the diagnosis in approximately half the cases.

Conclusion

Both CEUS and MR imaging have a high diagnostic performance in incidental focal liver lesions and are complementary when diagnosis is uncertain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Little JM, Richardson A, Tait N (1991) Hepatic dystychoma: a five year experience. HPB Surg 4:291–297CrossRefPubMed Little JM, Richardson A, Tait N (1991) Hepatic dystychoma: a five year experience. HPB Surg 4:291–297CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Sofka CM (1997) Hepatic hemangiomas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 5:241–253PubMed Semelka RC, Sofka CM (1997) Hepatic hemangiomas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 5:241–253PubMed
4.
go back to reference Quaia E, Stacul F, Gaiani S, Ricci P, Passariello R, Curzio D et al (2004) Comparison of diagnostic performance of unenhanced vs SonoVue - enhanced ultrasonography in focal liver lesions characterization. The experience of three Italian centers. Radiol Med (Torino) 108:71–81 Quaia E, Stacul F, Gaiani S, Ricci P, Passariello R, Curzio D et al (2004) Comparison of diagnostic performance of unenhanced vs SonoVue - enhanced ultrasonography in focal liver lesions characterization. The experience of three Italian centers. Radiol Med (Torino) 108:71–81
5.
go back to reference Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catala V, Bianchi L, Gilabert R, Garcia A et al (2006) Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:158–167CrossRefPubMed Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catala V, Bianchi L, Gilabert R, Garcia A et al (2006) Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:158–167CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L, Claudon M, Correas JM, Cosgrove D et al (2004) Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004. Ultraschall Med 25:249–256CrossRefPubMed Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L, Claudon M, Correas JM, Cosgrove D et al (2004) Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004. Ultraschall Med 25:249–256CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44CrossRefPubMed Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Elsayes KM, Leyendecker JR, Menias CO et al (2007) MRI characterization of 124 CT-indeterminate focal hepatic lesions: evaluation of clinical utility. HPB (Oxford) 9:208–215 Elsayes KM, Leyendecker JR, Menias CO et al (2007) MRI characterization of 124 CT-indeterminate focal hepatic lesions: evaluation of clinical utility. HPB (Oxford) 9:208–215
9.
go back to reference Phongkitkarun S, Srianujata T, Jatchavala J (2009) Supplement value of magnetic resonance imaging in small hepatic lesion (< or = 20 mm) detected on routine computed tomography. J Med Assoc Thai 92:677–686PubMed Phongkitkarun S, Srianujata T, Jatchavala J (2009) Supplement value of magnetic resonance imaging in small hepatic lesion (< or = 20 mm) detected on routine computed tomography. J Med Assoc Thai 92:677–686PubMed
10.
go back to reference Vilgrain V, Flejou JF, Arrive L, Belghiti J, Najmark D, Menu Y et al (1992) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: MR imaging and pathologic correlation in 37 patients. Radiology 184:699–703PubMed Vilgrain V, Flejou JF, Arrive L, Belghiti J, Najmark D, Menu Y et al (1992) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: MR imaging and pathologic correlation in 37 patients. Radiology 184:699–703PubMed
11.
go back to reference Soyer P, Gueye C, Somveille E, Laissy JP, Scherrer A (1995) MR diagnosis of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors versus hemangiomas: relative merits of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced gradient-recalled echo and unenhanced spin-echo images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1407–1413PubMed Soyer P, Gueye C, Somveille E, Laissy JP, Scherrer A (1995) MR diagnosis of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors versus hemangiomas: relative merits of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced gradient-recalled echo and unenhanced spin-echo images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1407–1413PubMed
12.
go back to reference Buetow PC, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck JL, Ros PR, Goodman ZD (1996) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16:369–388PubMed Buetow PC, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck JL, Ros PR, Goodman ZD (1996) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16:369–388PubMed
13.
go back to reference Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1999) CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics 19:431–451PubMed Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1999) CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics 19:431–451PubMed
14.
go back to reference Arrive L, Flejou JF, Vilgrain V, Belghiti J, Najmark D, Zins M et al (1994) Hepatic adenoma: MR findings in 51 pathologically proved lesions. Radiology 193:507–512PubMed Arrive L, Flejou JF, Vilgrain V, Belghiti J, Najmark D, Zins M et al (1994) Hepatic adenoma: MR findings in 51 pathologically proved lesions. Radiology 193:507–512PubMed
15.
go back to reference Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M, Rossi S, Garioni L, Rosa L et al (2004) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology 232:420–430CrossRefPubMed Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M, Rossi S, Garioni L, Rosa L et al (2004) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology 232:420–430CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN, Murphy-Lavallee J, Wilson SR (2008) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:58–66CrossRefPubMed Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN, Murphy-Lavallee J, Wilson SR (2008) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:58–66CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wilson SR, Burns PN (2006) An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 86:1401–1412CrossRef Wilson SR, Burns PN (2006) An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 86:1401–1412CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Trillaud H, Bruel JM, Valette PJ et al (2009) Characterization of focal liver lesions with SonoVue-enhanced sonography: international multicenter-study in comparison to CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 15:3748–3756CrossRefPubMed Trillaud H, Bruel JM, Valette PJ et al (2009) Characterization of focal liver lesions with SonoVue-enhanced sonography: international multicenter-study in comparison to CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 15:3748–3756CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fagan TJ (1975) Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257PubMed Fagan TJ (1975) Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257PubMed
21.
go back to reference Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
22.
go back to reference Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp GraphStat 5:299–314CrossRef Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp GraphStat 5:299–314CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Begg CB, Greenes RA, Iglewicz B (1986) The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic tests. J Chronic Dis 39:575–584CrossRefPubMed Begg CB, Greenes RA, Iglewicz B (1986) The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic tests. J Chronic Dis 39:575–584CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim CS, Lee JM (2003) Contrast-enhanced agent detection imaging: value in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions. J Ultrasound Med 22:897–910PubMed Youk JH, Kim CS, Lee JM (2003) Contrast-enhanced agent detection imaging: value in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions. J Ultrasound Med 22:897–910PubMed
25.
go back to reference Leen E, Ceccotti P, Kalogeropoulou C, Angerson WJ, Moug SJ, Horgan PG (2006) Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1551–1559CrossRefPubMed Leen E, Ceccotti P, Kalogeropoulou C, Angerson WJ, Moug SJ, Horgan PG (2006) Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1551–1559CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images–concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174CrossRefPubMed Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images–concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271:703–707CrossRefPubMed Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271:703–707CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Nguyen BN, Flejou JF, Terris B, Belghiti J, Degott C (1999) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: a comprehensive pathologic study of 305 lesions and recognition of new histologic forms. Am J Surg Pathol 3(12):1441–1454CrossRef Nguyen BN, Flejou JF, Terris B, Belghiti J, Degott C (1999) Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: a comprehensive pathologic study of 305 lesions and recognition of new histologic forms. Am J Surg Pathol 3(12):1441–1454CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Attal P, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, Paradis V, Terris B, Belghiti J et al (2003) Telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia: US, CT, and MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation in 13 cases. Radiology 228:465–472CrossRefPubMed Attal P, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, Paradis V, Terris B, Belghiti J et al (2003) Telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia: US, CT, and MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation in 13 cases. Radiology 228:465–472CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Paradis V, Champault A, Ronot M, Deschamps L, Valla DC, Vidaud D et al (2007) Telangiectatic adenoma: an entity associated with increased body mass index and inflammation. Hepatology 46:140–146CrossRefPubMed Paradis V, Champault A, Ronot M, Deschamps L, Valla DC, Vidaud D et al (2007) Telangiectatic adenoma: an entity associated with increased body mass index and inflammation. Hepatology 46:140–146CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Romanini L, Passamonti M, Aiani L, Cabassa P, Raieli G, Montermini I et al (2007) Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: a multicentre Italian experience. Eur Radiol 17(Suppl 6):F99–F106PubMed Romanini L, Passamonti M, Aiani L, Cabassa P, Raieli G, Montermini I et al (2007) Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: a multicentre Italian experience. Eur Radiol 17(Suppl 6):F99–F106PubMed
32.
go back to reference Cherqui D, Rahmouni A, Charlotte F, Boulahdour H, Metreau JM, Meignan M et al (1995) Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological, and pathological correlations. Hepatology 22:1674–1681CrossRefPubMed Cherqui D, Rahmouni A, Charlotte F, Boulahdour H, Metreau JM, Meignan M et al (1995) Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological, and pathological correlations. Hepatology 22:1674–1681CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Brown ED, Ascher SM, Patt RH, Bagley AS, Li W et al (1994) Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 192:401–406PubMed Semelka RC, Brown ED, Ascher SM, Patt RH, Bagley AS, Li W et al (1994) Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 192:401–406PubMed
34.
go back to reference Herman P, Pugliese V, Machado MA et al (2000) Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: differential diagnosis and treatment. World J Surg 24:372–376CrossRefPubMed Herman P, Pugliese V, Machado MA et al (2000) Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: differential diagnosis and treatment. World J Surg 24:372–376CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Choi BY, Nguyen MH (2005) The diagnosis and management of benign hepatic tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:401–412CrossRefPubMed Choi BY, Nguyen MH (2005) The diagnosis and management of benign hepatic tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:401–412CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging
Authors
Michael Soussan
Christophe Aubé
Stéphane Bahrami
Jérôme Boursier
Dominique Charles Valla
Valérie Vilgrain
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1700-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

European Radiology 7/2010 Go to the issue