Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Interventional

The use of covered stents for the endovascular treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a prospective study with a 5-year follow-up

Authors: Alex Szólics, László K. Sztriha, Péter Szikra, Miklós Szólics, András Palkó, Erika Vörös

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the use of covered stents for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis caused by highly embologenic plaques, and to study the long-term outcome of patients receiving such covered stents.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2007, 46 patients (63% symptomatic, 78.3% male, 67 ± 8.6 years old) with internal carotid artery stenosis caused by embologenic plaques or restenosis were treated with self-expanding covered stents (Symbiot, Boston Scientific). Pre-dilatation or protecting devices were not used. Post-dilatation was applied in every patient. Each patient was followed long-term. The outcome measures were the occurrence of neurological events, and the development of in-stent restenosis, as detected by clinical examination and duplex ultrasound.

Results

The technical success rate of stenting was 100%. There were no neurological complications in the peri-procedural period. The mean follow-up period was 34.3 ± 27.7 months (the rate of patients lost to follow-up was 15.2%) during which no stroke or stroke-related deaths occurred. Restenosis was detected in 3 patients (6.5%).

Conclusion

Covered stents provide efficient peri- and post-procedural protection against neurological complications due to embolisation from high-risk plaques during carotid artery stenting. Restenosis of covered stents appears to be infrequent during long-term follow-up.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wholey MH, Al-Mubarak N, Wholey MH (2003) Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:259–266CrossRefPubMed Wholey MH, Al-Mubarak N, Wholey MH (2003) Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:259–266CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cremonesi A, Menetti R, Setacci F et al (2003) Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke 34:1936–1941CrossRefPubMed Cremonesi A, Menetti R, Setacci F et al (2003) Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke 34:1936–1941CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kastrup A, Grotschel K, Krapf H et al (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: A systematic review of literature. Stroke 34:813–819CrossRefPubMed Kastrup A, Grotschel K, Krapf H et al (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: A systematic review of literature. Stroke 34:813–819CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloose K et al (2005) Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 46:241–247 Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloose K et al (2005) Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 46:241–247
5.
go back to reference Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Manetti R et al (2005) Carotid angioplasty and stenting: lesion related treatment strategies. EuroIntervention 1:289–295PubMed Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Manetti R et al (2005) Carotid angioplasty and stenting: lesion related treatment strategies. EuroIntervention 1:289–295PubMed
6.
go back to reference Parodi JC, La Mura R, Ferreira LM et al (2000) Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral protection devices. J Vasc Surg 32:1127–1136CrossRefPubMed Parodi JC, La Mura R, Ferreira LM et al (2000) Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral protection devices. J Vasc Surg 32:1127–1136CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek JJ et al (2001) Effect of the distal balloon-protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation 104:1999–2002CrossRefPubMed Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek JJ et al (2001) Effect of the distal balloon-protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation 104:1999–2002CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K et al (2007) Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:135–141CrossRefPubMed Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K et al (2007) Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:135–141CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vos JA, van den Berg JC, Sjef MPG et al (2005) Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patients. Radiology 234:493–499CrossRefPubMed Vos JA, van den Berg JC, Sjef MPG et al (2005) Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patients. Radiology 234:493–499CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M et al (2009) Protection or non protection in carotid stent angioplasty. The influence of Interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE trial. Stroke 40:841–846CrossRefPubMed Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M et al (2009) Protection or non protection in carotid stent angioplasty. The influence of Interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE trial. Stroke 40:841–846CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sztriha LK, Vörös E, Sas K et al (2004) Favorable early outcome of carotid artery stenting without protection devices. Stroke 35:2862–2866CrossRefPubMed Sztriha LK, Vörös E, Sas K et al (2004) Favorable early outcome of carotid artery stenting without protection devices. Stroke 35:2862–2866CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schillinger M, Dick P, Wiest G et al (2006) Covered versus bare self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis: a stopped randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther 13:312–319CrossRefPubMed Schillinger M, Dick P, Wiest G et al (2006) Covered versus bare self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis: a stopped randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther 13:312–319CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (1991) Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 22:711–720 North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (1991) Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 22:711–720
14.
go back to reference Vitek JJ, Roubin GS, Al-Mubarak N, New G, Iyer SS (2000) Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1736–1743PubMed Vitek JJ, Roubin GS, Al-Mubarak N, New G, Iyer SS (2000) Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1736–1743PubMed
15.
go back to reference Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (1995) Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. JAMA 273:1421–1428CrossRef Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (1995) Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. JAMA 273:1421–1428CrossRef
16.
go back to reference MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502CrossRef MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schillinger M, Gschwendtner M, Reimers B (2008) Does carotid stent cell design matter? Stroke 39:905–909CrossRefPubMed Schillinger M, Gschwendtner M, Reimers B (2008) Does carotid stent cell design matter? Stroke 39:905–909CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2005) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy. A cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905CrossRefPubMed Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2005) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy. A cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mukherjee D, Roffi M, Bajzer C, Yadav JS (2001) Endovascular treatment of carotid artery aneurysms with covered stents. Circulation 104:2995CrossRefPubMed Mukherjee D, Roffi M, Bajzer C, Yadav JS (2001) Endovascular treatment of carotid artery aneurysms with covered stents. Circulation 104:2995CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cil B, Peynircioglu B, Geyik S et al (2007) Exclusion of atherosclerotic plaque from the circulation using stent-grafts: alternative to carotid stenting with a protection device? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 3:1740–1759 Cil B, Peynircioglu B, Geyik S et al (2007) Exclusion of atherosclerotic plaque from the circulation using stent-grafts: alternative to carotid stenting with a protection device? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 3:1740–1759
21.
go back to reference Müller-Hülsbeck S, Hüsler E, Schaffner S et al (2004) An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective porous membrane. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1295–1305PubMed Müller-Hülsbeck S, Hüsler E, Schaffner S et al (2004) An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective porous membrane. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1295–1305PubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of covered stents for the endovascular treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a prospective study with a 5-year follow-up
Authors
Alex Szólics
László K. Sztriha
Péter Szikra
Miklós Szólics
András Palkó
Erika Vörös
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1696-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

European Radiology 7/2010 Go to the issue