Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Cardiac

Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadolinium-enhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: a multicenter study

Authors: Kakuya Kitagawa, Hajime Sakuma, Motonori Nagata, Shigeo Okuda, Masaharu Hirano, Akihiro Tanimoto, Masaki Matsusako, Joao A. C. Lima, Sachio Kuribayashi, Kan Takeda

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of stress and rest perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) MRI for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 50 patients with suspected CAD underwent stress-rest perfusion MRI, followed by LGE MRI with a 1.5-T system. Stress-rest perfusion MRI resulted in an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.92 for observer 1 and 0.84 for observer 2 with sensitivity and specificity of 89% (32/36) and 79% (11/14) by observer 1, 83% (30/36) and 71% (10/14) by observer 2, respectively, showing a moderate interobserver agreement (Cohen’s κ = 0.49). While combination of stress-rest perfusion and LGE MRI did not result in improved accuracy for the prediction of flow-limiting obstructive CAD (AUC 0.81 for observer 1 and 0.80 for observer 2), the sensitivity was increased to 92% in both observers with a substantial interobserver agreement (κ = 0.70). Stress-rest myocardial perfusion MRI is an accurate diagnostic test for identifying patients with obstructive CAD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR et al (2007) Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 244:112–120PubMedCrossRef Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR et al (2007) Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 244:112–120PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S et al (2006) Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1946–1950PubMedCrossRef Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S et al (2006) Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1946–1950PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 28:2354–2360PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 28:2354–2360PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nassenstein K, Waltering KU, Kelle S et al (2008) Magnetic resonance coronary angiography with vasovisttrade mark: in-vivo T(1) estimation to improve image quality of navigator and breath-hold techniques. Eur Radiol 18:103–109PubMedCrossRef Nassenstein K, Waltering KU, Kelle S et al (2008) Magnetic resonance coronary angiography with vasovisttrade mark: in-vivo T(1) estimation to improve image quality of navigator and breath-hold techniques. Eur Radiol 18:103–109PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M et al (2000) Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 101:1379–1383PubMed Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M et al (2000) Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 101:1379–1383PubMed
6.
go back to reference Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM et al (2001) Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 104:2412–2416PubMedCrossRef Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM et al (2001) Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 104:2412–2416PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ et al (2002) Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346:1948–1953PubMedCrossRef Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ et al (2002) Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346:1948–1953PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS et al (2006) Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1427–1432PubMedCrossRef Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS et al (2006) Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1427–1432PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M et al (2003) Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 229:209–216PubMedCrossRef Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M et al (2003) Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 229:209–216PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S et al (2001) Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 103:2230–2235PubMed Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S et al (2001) Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 103:2230–2235PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432–437PubMedCrossRef Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432–437PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R et al (2004) Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 110:732–737PubMedCrossRef Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R et al (2004) Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 110:732–737PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R et al (2004) Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 25:1657–1665PubMedCrossRef Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R et al (2004) Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 25:1657–1665PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29:480–489PubMedCrossRef Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29:480–489PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sakuma H, Suzawa N, Ichikawa Y et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:95–102PubMed Sakuma H, Suzawa N, Ichikawa Y et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:95–102PubMed
16.
go back to reference Meyer C, Strach K, Thomas D et al (2008) High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 18:226–233PubMedCrossRef Meyer C, Strach K, Thomas D et al (2008) High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 18:226–233PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1343–1353PubMedCrossRef Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1343–1353PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Foo TK, Wu KC, Azevedo CF et al (2004) Partial fourier steady-state free precession (FIESTA) first-pass perfusion with improved image quality and efficient spatial coverage. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 11:1 Foo TK, Wu KC, Azevedo CF et al (2004) Partial fourier steady-state free precession (FIESTA) first-pass perfusion with improved image quality and efficient spatial coverage. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 11:1
19.
go back to reference Jeremias A, Filardo SD, Whitbourn RJ et al (2000) Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5'-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics. Circulation 101:318–323PubMed Jeremias A, Filardo SD, Whitbourn RJ et al (2000) Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5'-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics. Circulation 101:318–323PubMed
20.
go back to reference Miyagawa M, Kumano S, Sekiya M et al (1995) Thallium-201 myocardial tomography with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:1196–1201PubMedCrossRef Miyagawa M, Kumano S, Sekiya M et al (1995) Thallium-201 myocardial tomography with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:1196–1201PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pohost GM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM et al (2006) Task Force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (cardiovascular magnetic resonance [CMR]): endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:910–914PubMedCrossRef Pohost GM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM et al (2006) Task Force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (cardiovascular magnetic resonance [CMR]): endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:910–914PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P et al (2002) Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:641–652PubMedCrossRef Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P et al (2002) Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:641–652PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Arai AE (2000) Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11:383–398PubMedCrossRef Arai AE (2000) Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11:383–398PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Strach K, Meyer C, Thomas D et al (2007) High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol 17:1829–1835PubMedCrossRef Strach K, Meyer C, Thomas D et al (2007) High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol 17:1829–1835PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wang Y, Moin K, Akinboboye O et al (2005) Myocardial first pass perfusion: steady-state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 54:1123–1129PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Moin K, Akinboboye O et al (2005) Myocardial first pass perfusion: steady-state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 54:1123–1129PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 361:374–379PubMedCrossRef Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 361:374–379PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Barbier CE, Bjerner T, Johansson L et al (2006) Myocardial scars more frequent than expected: magnetic resonance imaging detects potential risk group. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:765–771PubMedCrossRef Barbier CE, Bjerner T, Johansson L et al (2006) Myocardial scars more frequent than expected: magnetic resonance imaging detects potential risk group. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:765–771PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ et al (2006) Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1630–1638PubMedCrossRef Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ et al (2006) Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1630–1638PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cury RC, Cattani CA, Gabure LA et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 240:39–45PubMedCrossRef Cury RC, Cattani CA, Gabure LA et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 240:39–45PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Erbel R, Heusch G (1999) Coronary microembolization–its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions. Herz 24:558–575PubMedCrossRef Erbel R, Heusch G (1999) Coronary microembolization–its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions. Herz 24:558–575PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
go back to reference Kwong RY, Chan AK, Brown KA et al (2006) Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease. Circulation 113:2733–2743PubMedCrossRef Kwong RY, Chan AK, Brown KA et al (2006) Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease. Circulation 113:2733–2743PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadolinium-enhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: a multicenter study
Authors
Kakuya Kitagawa
Hajime Sakuma
Motonori Nagata
Shigeo Okuda
Masaharu Hirano
Akihiro Tanimoto
Masaki Matsusako
Joao A. C. Lima
Sachio Kuribayashi
Kan Takeda
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1097-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

European Radiology 12/2008 Go to the issue