Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Musculoskeletal

Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma

Authors: Patric Kröpil, Roland Fenk, Lars B. Fritz, Dirk Blondin, Guido Kobbe, Ulrich Mödder, Mathias Cohnen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

This study compares the sensitivity of whole-body multidetector CT (MDCT) and conventional radiography (CR) in the staging of multiple myeloma (MM). Twenty-nine patients with MM underwent a staging examination both by MDCT and CR. CT examination was performed with a collimation of 64×0.6 mm, a tube potential of 100 kVp, an effective tube current-time product of 100 mAs and automatic dose modulation as low-dose protocol. Number, size and diagnostic confidence of osteolytic lesions were determined and compared. The effective dose of MDCT and CR was assessed. Using MDCT, the detection of osteolysis was increased seven-fold concerning the spine. Ninety-seven lesions in 18 patients were detected exclusively by MDCT. The detection rate concerning the spine, pelvic skeleton and thoracic cage was significantly higher (p≤0.001), and diagnostic confidence was increased by MDCT (p<0.02) compared to CR. Therapy was changed after MDCT in 18.2% of the patients with a clinical suspicion of progressive disease. The estimated effective dose of MDCT (4.8 mSv) and CR (1.7 mSv) was comparable. In conclusion, MDCT has a significantly higher sensitivity and reliability in the detection of osteolysis than CR and can be recommended as standard imaging method in the staging of MM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Durie BGM, Salmon SE (1982) The current status and future prospects of treatment for multiple myeloma. Clin Haematol 11:181–210PubMed Durie BGM, Salmon SE (1982) The current status and future prospects of treatment for multiple myeloma. Clin Haematol 11:181–210PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ludwig H (1986) Klinik de Multiplen Myeloms. Onkologe 5:297–306 Ludwig H (1986) Klinik de Multiplen Myeloms. Onkologe 5:297–306
3.
go back to reference Durie BGM (1986) Stanging and kinetics of multiple myeloma. Semin Oncol 13:300–309PubMed Durie BGM (1986) Stanging and kinetics of multiple myeloma. Semin Oncol 13:300–309PubMed
4.
go back to reference Durie BGM, Salmon SE (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma: correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment and survival. Cancer 36:842–854PubMedCrossRef Durie BGM, Salmon SE (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma: correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment and survival. Cancer 36:842–854PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Durie B, Kyle R, Belch A, et al (2003) Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. Haematol J 4:379–398 Durie B, Kyle R, Belch A, et al (2003) Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. Haematol J 4:379–398
6.
go back to reference Mulligan ME (2005) Imaging techniques used in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of patients with myeloma. Acta Radiol 46:716–724PubMedCrossRef Mulligan ME (2005) Imaging techniques used in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of patients with myeloma. Acta Radiol 46:716–724PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, Schmitz-Rode T, Blaum M, Fabry U, Günther RW (2002) MDCT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR 178:1729–1436 Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, Schmitz-Rode T, Blaum M, Fabry U, Günther RW (2002) MDCT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR 178:1729–1436
8.
go back to reference Horger M, Claussen CD, Bross-Bach U, Vonthein R, Trabold T, Heuschmid M, Pfannenberg C (2005) Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography. Eur J Radiology 54:289–297CrossRef Horger M, Claussen CD, Bross-Bach U, Vonthein R, Trabold T, Heuschmid M, Pfannenberg C (2005) Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography. Eur J Radiology 54:289–297CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Althen JN (2005) Automatic tube-current modulation in CT–a comparison between different solutions. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:308–312PubMedCrossRef Althen JN (2005) Automatic tube-current modulation in CT–a comparison between different solutions. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:308–312PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, Venstermans C, Termote JL (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, Venstermans C, Termote JL (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ewen K (1998) Moderne Bildgebung. Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, pp 35–44 Ewen K (1998) Moderne Bildgebung. Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, pp 35–44
12.
go back to reference Le Heron JC (1992) Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product. Phys Med Biol 37:2117–2126PubMedCrossRef Le Heron JC (1992) Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product. Phys Med Biol 37:2117–2126PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-Expo-ein neues Programm zur Dosisabschätzung im CT. Röfo 174:1570–1576PubMed Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-Expo-ein neues Programm zur Dosisabschätzung im CT. Röfo 174:1570–1576PubMed
14.
go back to reference Boccardo M, Pileri A (1997) Diagnosis, prognosis and standard treatment of multiple myeloma. Haematol Oncol Clin N Am 11:111–131CrossRef Boccardo M, Pileri A (1997) Diagnosis, prognosis and standard treatment of multiple myeloma. Haematol Oncol Clin N Am 11:111–131CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tertti R, Alanen A, Remes K (1995) The value of magnstic resonance imaging in screening myeloma lesions of the lumbar spine. Brit J Haematol 91:658–660 Tertti R, Alanen A, Remes K (1995) The value of magnstic resonance imaging in screening myeloma lesions of the lumbar spine. Brit J Haematol 91:658–660
16.
go back to reference Lecouvert FE, Malghem J, Michaux L, Maldague B, Ferrant A, Michaux JL, Vande Berg BC (1999) Skeletal survey in advanced multiple myeloma: radiographic versus MR imaging survey. Brit J Haematol 106:35–39CrossRef Lecouvert FE, Malghem J, Michaux L, Maldague B, Ferrant A, Michaux JL, Vande Berg BC (1999) Skeletal survey in advanced multiple myeloma: radiographic versus MR imaging survey. Brit J Haematol 106:35–39CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stäbler A, Baur A, Bartl R, Munker R, Lamerz R, Reiser MF (1996) Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates. AJR:1029–1036 Stäbler A, Baur A, Bartl R, Munker R, Lamerz R, Reiser MF (1996) Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates. AJR:1029–1036
18.
go back to reference Schick F (2005) Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol: 946–959 Schick F (2005) Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol: 946–959
19.
go back to reference Salomon A, Rahamani R, Seligsohn U, Ben-Artzi F (1984) Multiple myeloma: early vertebral involvement assessed by computerised tomography. Skeletal Radiol 11:258–261CrossRef Salomon A, Rahamani R, Seligsohn U, Ben-Artzi F (1984) Multiple myeloma: early vertebral involvement assessed by computerised tomography. Skeletal Radiol 11:258–261CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schreiman JS, McLeod RA, Kyle RA, Beabout JW (1985) Multiple myeloma: evaluation by CT. Radiology 154:483–486PubMed Schreiman JS, McLeod RA, Kyle RA, Beabout JW (1985) Multiple myeloma: evaluation by CT. Radiology 154:483–486PubMed
21.
go back to reference Scutellari PN, Galeotti R, Leprotti S, Piva N, Spanedda R (1997) Role of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of bone disease in multiple myeloma. Radiol Med (Torino) 93:669–675 Scutellari PN, Galeotti R, Leprotti S, Piva N, Spanedda R (1997) Role of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of bone disease in multiple myeloma. Radiol Med (Torino) 93:669–675
22.
go back to reference Baur-Melnyk A, Reiser M (2004) Staging of Multiple Myeloma with MRI: comparison to MSCT and conventional radiography. Radiologe 44:874–881PubMedCrossRef Baur-Melnyk A, Reiser M (2004) Staging of Multiple Myeloma with MRI: comparison to MSCT and conventional radiography. Radiologe 44:874–881PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zwirewich CV, Mayo JR, Muller NL (1991) Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma. Radiology 180:413–417PubMed Zwirewich CV, Mayo JR, Muller NL (1991) Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma. Radiology 180:413–417PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lee KS, Primack SL, Staples CA, Mayo JR, Aldrich JE, Muller NL (1994) Chronic infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracies of radiography and low- and conventional-dose thin-section CT. Radiology 56:521–525 Lee KS, Primack SL, Staples CA, Mayo JR, Aldrich JE, Muller NL (1994) Chronic infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracies of radiography and low- and conventional-dose thin-section CT. Radiology 56:521–525
25.
go back to reference Dammert S, Funke M, Merten HA, Obernauer S, Grabbe E (2002) Multislice helical CT (MSCT) for mid-facial trauma: Optimization of parameters for scanning and reconstruction. Röfo 174:874–879PubMed Dammert S, Funke M, Merten HA, Obernauer S, Grabbe E (2002) Multislice helical CT (MSCT) for mid-facial trauma: Optimization of parameters for scanning and reconstruction. Röfo 174:874–879PubMed
26.
go back to reference Tack D, Widelec J, De Maertelaer V, Bailly JM, Delcour C, Gevenois PA (2003) Comparison between low-dose and standard-dose multidetector CT in patients with suspected chronic sinusitis. AJR 181:939–944PubMed Tack D, Widelec J, De Maertelaer V, Bailly JM, Delcour C, Gevenois PA (2003) Comparison between low-dose and standard-dose multidetector CT in patients with suspected chronic sinusitis. AJR 181:939–944PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A (2003) A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiology 13:976–980 Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A (2003) A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiology 13:976–980
28.
go back to reference Luz O, Buchgeister M, Klabunde M, Trabold T, Kopp AF, Claussen CD, Heuschmid M (2007) Evaluation of dose exposure in 64-slice CT colonography. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0601-6 Luz O, Buchgeister M, Klabunde M, Trabold T, Kopp AF, Claussen CD, Heuschmid M (2007) Evaluation of dose exposure in 64-slice CT colonography. Eur Radiol DOI 10.​1007/​s00330-007-0601-6
29.
go back to reference Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Mödder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiology 13:1148–1153 Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Mödder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiology 13:1148–1153
30.
go back to reference Husstedt H, Prokop M, Becker H (1998) [Window width as a dosage-relevant factor in high-contrast structures in CT]. Rofo 168:139–143PubMed Husstedt H, Prokop M, Becker H (1998) [Window width as a dosage-relevant factor in high-contrast structures in CT]. Rofo 168:139–143PubMed
31.
go back to reference Ghanem N, Lohmann C, Engelhardt M, Pache G, Uhl M, Saueressig U et al. (2006) Whole-body MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with plasma cell neoplasms in comparison to the radiological skeletal survey. Eur Radiology 16:1005–1014CrossRef Ghanem N, Lohmann C, Engelhardt M, Pache G, Uhl M, Saueressig U et al. (2006) Whole-body MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with plasma cell neoplasms in comparison to the radiological skeletal survey. Eur Radiology 16:1005–1014CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Nanni C, Zamagni e, Mohsen F, Castellucci P, Tosi P, Cangini D, Salizzoni E, Canini R, Cavo M, Fanti S (2006) Role of 18-F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:525–531PubMedCrossRef Nanni C, Zamagni e, Mohsen F, Castellucci P, Tosi P, Cangini D, Salizzoni E, Canini R, Cavo M, Fanti S (2006) Role of 18-F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:525–531PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB, Kitamura N, Sychterz CJ, Engh Jr CA, Claus AM, Potter HG, Engh Sr CA (2005) Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:138–144PubMedCrossRef Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB, Kitamura N, Sychterz CJ, Engh Jr CA, Claus AM, Potter HG, Engh Sr CA (2005) Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:138–144PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma
Authors
Patric Kröpil
Roland Fenk
Lars B. Fritz
Dirk Blondin
Guido Kobbe
Ulrich Mödder
Mathias Cohnen
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0738-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

European Radiology 1/2008 Go to the issue