Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2008

Open Access 01-01-2008 | Gastrointestinal

CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging

Authors: Stuart A. Taylor, Andrew Slater, David N. Burling, Emily Tam, Rebecca Greenhalgh, Louise Gartner, Julia Scarth, Robert Pearce, Paul Bassett, Steve Halligan

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

To establish the optimum barium-based reduced-laxative tagging regimen prior to CT colonography (CTC). Ninety-five subjects underwent reduced-laxative (13 g senna/18 g magnesium citrate) CTC prior to same-day colonoscopy and were randomised to one of four tagging regimens using 20 ml 40%w/v barium sulphate: regimen A: four doses, B: three doses, C: three doses plus 220 ml 2.1% barium sulphate, or D: three doses plus 15 ml diatriazoate megluamine. Patient experience was assessed immediately after CTC and 1 week later. Two radiologists graded residual stool (1: none/scattered to 4: >50% circumference) and tagging efficacy for stool (1: untagged to 5: 100% tagged) and fluid (1: untagged, 2: layered, 3: tagged), noting the HU of tagged fluid. Preparation was good (76–94% segments graded 1), although best for regimen D (P = 0.02). Across all regimens, stool tagging quality was high (mean 3.7–4.5) and not significantly different among regimens. The HU of layered tagged fluid was higher for regimens C/D than A/B (P = 0.002). Detection of cancer (n = 2), polyps ≥6 mm (n = 21), and ≤5 mm (n = 72) was 100, 81 and 32% respectively, with only four false positives ≥6 mm. Reduced preparation was tolerated better than full endoscopic preparation by 61%. Reduced-laxative CTC with three doses of 20 ml 40% barium sulphate is as effective as more complex regimens, retaining adequate diagnostic accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP (2003) Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98:578–585PubMedCrossRef Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP (2003) Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98:578–585PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Gevers A, Rutgeerts P, Hiele M, Van Cutsem E, Marchal G (2002) Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 12:1410–1415PubMedCrossRef Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Gevers A, Rutgeerts P, Hiele M, Van Cutsem E, Marchal G (2002) Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 12:1410–1415PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Offord KP, Harris AM, Wilson LA, Ahlquist DA (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227:378–384PubMedCrossRef Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Offord KP, Harris AM, Wilson LA, Ahlquist DA (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227:378–384PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heymann TD, Chopra K, Nunn E, Coulter L, Westaby D, Murray-Lyon IM (1996) Bowel preparation at home: prospective study of adverse effects in elderly people. BMJ 313:727–728PubMed Heymann TD, Chopra K, Nunn E, Coulter L, Westaby D, Murray-Lyon IM (1996) Bowel preparation at home: prospective study of adverse effects in elderly people. BMJ 313:727–728PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2004) Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:945–948PubMed Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2004) Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:945–948PubMed
6.
go back to reference Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, Sinibaldi G, Murakami T, Sammartino P, Hori M, Piacentini F, Nofroni I, Stipa V, Passariello R (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300–1311PubMedCrossRef Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, Sinibaldi G, Murakami T, Sammartino P, Hori M, Piacentini F, Nofroni I, Stipa V, Passariello R (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300–1311PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Harmsen WS, Tait K, Wilson LA, Corcoran KE (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219:693–698PubMed Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Harmsen WS, Tait K, Wilson LA, Corcoran KE (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219:693–698PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results—polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393–403PubMedCrossRef Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results—polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393–403PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1836–1842PubMed Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1836–1842PubMed
10.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF (2006) Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 239:149–159PubMedCrossRef Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF (2006) Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 239:149–159PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction—initial observations. Radiology 226:911–917PubMedCrossRef Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction—initial observations. Radiology 226:911–917PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, Gartner L, Paliwalla M, Peiris C, Singh L, Bassett P, Bartram C (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:96–103PubMedCrossRef Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, Gartner L, Paliwalla M, Peiris C, Singh L, Bassett P, Bartram C (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:96–103PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, Espeland MA, Phillips K, Han JP, Mikulaninec C, Vining DJ (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:304–310PubMedCrossRef Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, Espeland MA, Phillips K, Han JP, Mikulaninec C, Vining DJ (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:304–310PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R, Cook CF, Wardle J, McIntyre P, Aubrey R, Baron C, Sutton S, Cuzick J, Senapati A, Northover JM (2000) Single blind, randomised trial of efficacy and acceptability of oral Picolax versus self administered phosphate enema in bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. BMJ 320:1504–1508PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R, Cook CF, Wardle J, McIntyre P, Aubrey R, Baron C, Sutton S, Cuzick J, Senapati A, Northover JM (2000) Single blind, randomised trial of efficacy and acceptability of oral Picolax versus self administered phosphate enema in bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. BMJ 320:1504–1508PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, Morley S, Atkin W, Bartram CI (2003) Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: effect of Citramag and Picolax. Clin Radiol 58:723–732PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, Morley S, Atkin W, Bartram CI (2003) Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: effect of Citramag and Picolax. Clin Radiol 58:723–732PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, Bartram CI (2003) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, Bartram CI (2003) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bosworth HB, Rockey DC, Paulson EK, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Sanders LL, Yee J, Henderson J, Hatten P, Burdick S, Sanyal A, Rubin DT, Sterling M, Akerkar G, Bhutani MS, Binmoeller K, Garvie J, Bini EJ, McQuaid K, Foster WL, Thompson WM, Dachman A, Halvorsen R (2006) Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests. Am J Med 119:791–799PubMedCrossRef Bosworth HB, Rockey DC, Paulson EK, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Sanders LL, Yee J, Henderson J, Hatten P, Burdick S, Sanyal A, Rubin DT, Sterling M, Akerkar G, Bhutani MS, Binmoeller K, Garvie J, Bini EJ, McQuaid K, Foster WL, Thompson WM, Dachman A, Halvorsen R (2006) Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests. Am J Med 119:791–799PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Slater A, Taylor SA, Burling D, Gartner L, Scarth J, Halligan S (2006) Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement-in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen. Radiology 240:101–109PubMedCrossRef Slater A, Taylor SA, Burling D, Gartner L, Scarth J, Halligan S (2006) Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement-in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen. Radiology 240:101–109PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ridley LJ (1998) Allergic reactions to oral iodinated contrast agents: reactions to oral contrast. Australas Radiol 42:114–117PubMed Ridley LJ (1998) Allergic reactions to oral iodinated contrast agents: reactions to oral contrast. Australas Radiol 42:114–117PubMed
21.
go back to reference Skucas J (1997) Anaphylactoid reactions with gastrointestinal contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:962–964PubMed Skucas J (1997) Anaphylactoid reactions with gastrointestinal contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:962–964PubMed
22.
go back to reference Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E, Gartner L, Scarth J, Peiris C, Gupta A, Marshall M, Burling D, Halligan S (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16:2275–2283PubMedCrossRef Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E, Gartner L, Scarth J, Peiris C, Gupta A, Marshall M, Burling D, Halligan S (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16:2275–2283PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–579PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–579PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging
Authors
Stuart A. Taylor
Andrew Slater
David N. Burling
Emily Tam
Rebecca Greenhalgh
Louise Gartner
Julia Scarth
Robert Pearce
Paul Bassett
Steve Halligan
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

European Radiology 1/2008 Go to the issue