Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Rheumatology International 5/2007

01-03-2007 | Original Article

Which of the three different tender points assessment methods is more useful for predicting the severity of fibromyalgia syndrome?

Authors: Nurettin Tastekin, Murat Birtane, Kaan Uzunca

Published in: Rheumatology International | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Digital palpation, myalgic scoring and dolorimetry are frequently used to count tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. We aimed to investigate the probable relation between tender points count and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire and to assess which of the tender point counting methods is the most successful in predicting the severity of the disease. Tender point areas of 36 patients with fibromyalgia syndrome were assessed with three methods which are myalgic scoring, digital and dolorimetric tender points counting methods. Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was used to measure the disease severity. The correlation between each of the assessment methods and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was investigated. The mean count of digitally evaluated tender points was 14.86 ± 2.67 and by dolorimetry was 11.81 ± 4.48. The mean total myalgic score was found to be 24.61 ± 8.91. All of the tender point evaluation methods correlated positively with each other (P < 0.01). Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score was also correlated with only digital palpation tender point count of these three evaluation methods (r = 0.427, P < 0.05). Digital tender point count seemed to be sufficient for assessment, and there is no need for an additional instrument for tender point evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 33:160–172PubMedCrossRef Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 33:160–172PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fitzcharles MA (1999) Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? The approving rheumatologist’s evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 13(3):437–443CrossRef Fitzcharles MA (1999) Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? The approving rheumatologist’s evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 13(3):437–443CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gracely HG (2003) Evoked pain measures in fibromyalgia. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17(4):593–603PubMedCrossRef Gracely HG (2003) Evoked pain measures in fibromyalgia. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17(4):593–603PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maquet D, Croisier JL, Demoulin C, Crielaard JM (2004) Pressure pain thresholds of tender point sites in patients with fibromyalgia and in healthy controls. Eur J Pain 8:111–117PubMedCrossRef Maquet D, Croisier JL, Demoulin C, Crielaard JM (2004) Pressure pain thresholds of tender point sites in patients with fibromyalgia and in healthy controls. Eur J Pain 8:111–117PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marques AP, Ferreira EA, Matsutani LA, Pereira CA, Assumpcao A (2005) Quantifying pain threshold and quality of life of fibromyalgia patients. Clin Rheumatol 24(3):266–271PubMedCrossRef Marques AP, Ferreira EA, Matsutani LA, Pereira CA, Assumpcao A (2005) Quantifying pain threshold and quality of life of fibromyalgia patients. Clin Rheumatol 24(3):266–271PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jacobs JW, Geenen R, Van der Heide A, Rasker JJ, Bijlsma JW (1995) Are tender point scores assessed by digital palpation in fibromyalgia reliable? An investigation into the varience of tender point scores. Scand J Rheumatol 24:243–247PubMed Jacobs JW, Geenen R, Van der Heide A, Rasker JJ, Bijlsma JW (1995) Are tender point scores assessed by digital palpation in fibromyalgia reliable? An investigation into the varience of tender point scores. Scand J Rheumatol 24:243–247PubMed
7.
go back to reference Petzke F, Gracely RH, Park K, Ambrose K, Clauw DJ (2003) What do tender points measure? Influence of distress on 4 measures of tenderness. J Rheumatol 30(3):567–574PubMed Petzke F, Gracely RH, Park K, Ambrose K, Clauw DJ (2003) What do tender points measure? Influence of distress on 4 measures of tenderness. J Rheumatol 30(3):567–574PubMed
8.
go back to reference Pagano T, Matsutani LA, Ferreira EAG, Marques AP, Pereira CAB (2004) Assessment of anxiety and quality of life in fibromyalgia patients. Sao Paulo Med J 122(6):252–258PubMedCrossRef Pagano T, Matsutani LA, Ferreira EAG, Marques AP, Pereira CAB (2004) Assessment of anxiety and quality of life in fibromyalgia patients. Sao Paulo Med J 122(6):252–258PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Russell JI (1999) Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? The clinical investigator’s evidence. Baillière’s Clin Rheumatol 13(3):445–454 Russell JI (1999) Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? The clinical investigator’s evidence. Baillière’s Clin Rheumatol 13(3):445–454
10.
go back to reference Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM (1991) The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 18:728-733PubMed Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM (1991) The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 18:728-733PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sarmer S, Ergin S, Yavuzer G (2000) The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 20(1):9–12PubMedCrossRef Sarmer S, Ergin S, Yavuzer G (2000) The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 20(1):9–12PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Buckelew SP, Parker JC, Keefe FJ, Deuser WE, Crews TM, Conway R, Kay DR, Hewett JE (1994) Self-efficacy and pain behavior among subjects with fibromyalgia. Pain 59(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef Buckelew SP, Parker JC, Keefe FJ, Deuser WE, Crews TM, Conway R, Kay DR, Hewett JE (1994) Self-efficacy and pain behavior among subjects with fibromyalgia. Pain 59(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wolfe F (1997) The relation between tender points and fibromyalgia symptom variables: evidence that fibromyalgia is not a discrete disorder in the clinic. Ann Rheum Dis 56:268–271PubMedCrossRef Wolfe F (1997) The relation between tender points and fibromyalgia symptom variables: evidence that fibromyalgia is not a discrete disorder in the clinic. Ann Rheum Dis 56:268–271PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Croft P, Schollum J, Silman A (1994) Population study of tender point counts and as evidence of fibromyalgia. BMJ 309:696–699PubMed Croft P, Schollum J, Silman A (1994) Population study of tender point counts and as evidence of fibromyalgia. BMJ 309:696–699PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ (1995) Aspect of fibromyalgia in the general population: sex, pain threshold, and fibromyalgia symptoms. J Rheumatol 22:151–156PubMed Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ (1995) Aspect of fibromyalgia in the general population: sex, pain threshold, and fibromyalgia symptoms. J Rheumatol 22:151–156PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hagglund KJ, Deuser WE, Buckelew SP, Hewett J, Kay DR (1994) Weather, beliefs about weather, and disease severity among patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res 7(3):130–135PubMedCrossRef Hagglund KJ, Deuser WE, Buckelew SP, Hewett J, Kay DR (1994) Weather, beliefs about weather, and disease severity among patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res 7(3):130–135PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Which of the three different tender points assessment methods is more useful for predicting the severity of fibromyalgia syndrome?
Authors
Nurettin Tastekin
Murat Birtane
Kaan Uzunca
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Rheumatology International / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Electronic ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0232-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Rheumatology International 5/2007 Go to the issue