Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Glioblastoma | Original Article

d,l-Methadone does not improve radio- and chemotherapy in glioblastoma in vitro

Authors: Henry Oppermann, Martina Matusova, Annegret Glasow, Johannes Dietterle, Rainer Baran-Schmidt, Karsten Neumann, Jürgen Meixensberger, Frank Gaunitz

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant tumor of the central nervous system. Median survival of glioblastoma patients under standard therapy including radiotherapy and chemotherapy using temozolomide (TMZ) is 14.6 months. As cell culture experiments combining d,l-methadone with doxorubicin demonstrated an increased reduction of cell viability of glioblastoma cells, the opioid has been discussed as a drug for the treatment of GBM. Despite lack of clinical and experimental evidence that d,l-methadone in combination with standard therapy will be beneficial, an increasing number of tumor patients medicating themselves with d,l-methadone present to the hospitals in Germany.

Methods

As a first step towards understanding whether d,l-methadone may increase the efficacy of standard therapy, we used a cell culture model of primary GBM and fibroblast cell cultures derived from GBM patients. The cultures were treated with different concentrations of d,l-methadone in combination with X-irradiation, TMZ or both. Cell viability was determined by measuring ATP in cell lysates and dehydrogenase activity in living cells.

Results

When only treated with d,l-methadone, 1 µM of the opioid was sufficient to reduce viability of fibroblasts, whereas 10 µM was needed to significantly reduce glioblastoma cell viability. In addition, d,l-methadone did not improve the anti-neoplastic effects of X-irradiation, temozolomide or both.

Conclusions

As d,l-methadone reduces glioblastoma cell viability only when concentrations are used that had been reported to be toxic to patients and as there were no interactions observable combining it with standard therapy, a recommendation for the use of d,l-methadone in glioblastoma therapy cannot be given.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996CrossRef Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hübner J, Hartmann M, Wedding U et al (2017) Methadon in der Onkologie: “Strohhalmfunktion” ohne Evidenz. Dtsch Arztebl International 114(33–34):A–A1530 Hübner J, Hartmann M, Wedding U et al (2017) Methadon in der Onkologie: “Strohhalmfunktion” ohne Evidenz. Dtsch Arztebl International 114(33–34):A–A1530
11.
go back to reference Schiffer D, Giordana MT, Germano I et al (1986) Anaplasia and heterogeneity of GFAP expression in gliomas. Tumori 72(2):163–170CrossRef Schiffer D, Giordana MT, Germano I et al (1986) Anaplasia and heterogeneity of GFAP expression in gliomas. Tumori 72(2):163–170CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675CrossRef Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 57(1):289–300 Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 57(1):289–300
21.
go back to reference Kreye G, Masel E-K, Hackner K et al (2018) Methadon als antitumortherapie: Schwindel, Hoffnung oder Risiko?: Eine Serie von Kasuistiken und kurzer Überblick über aktuelle Literatur sowie Empfehlungen der Fachgesellschaften (Methadone as anticancer treatment: hype, hope, or hazard?: a series of case reports and a short review of the current literature and recommendations of the societies). Wien Med Wochenschr 168(7–8):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-018-0623-5 CrossRefPubMed Kreye G, Masel E-K, Hackner K et al (2018) Methadon als antitumortherapie: Schwindel, Hoffnung oder Risiko?: Eine Serie von Kasuistiken und kurzer Überblick über aktuelle Literatur sowie Empfehlungen der Fachgesellschaften (Methadone as anticancer treatment: hype, hope, or hazard?: a series of case reports and a short review of the current literature and recommendations of the societies). Wien Med Wochenschr 168(7–8):159–167. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10354-018-0623-5 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Maneckjee R, Minna JD (1992) Nonconventional opioid binding sites mediate growth inhibitory effects of methadone on human lung cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(4):1169–1173CrossRef Maneckjee R, Minna JD (1992) Nonconventional opioid binding sites mediate growth inhibitory effects of methadone on human lung cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(4):1169–1173CrossRef
Metadata
Title
d,l-Methadone does not improve radio- and chemotherapy in glioblastoma in vitro
Authors
Henry Oppermann
Martina Matusova
Annegret Glasow
Johannes Dietterle
Rainer Baran-Schmidt
Karsten Neumann
Jürgen Meixensberger
Frank Gaunitz
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03816-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine