Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Hematology 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Ruxolitinib | Original Article

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea combination in patients with hyperproliferative myelofibrosis

Published in: Annals of Hematology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Ruxolitinib is the only commercially available JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis-related splenomegaly and symptoms. During treatment, as rare conditions, leukocytosis and/or thrombocytosis could develop and the management of these situations is not well established. We report here 53 myelofibrosis patients that received a combination of hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib because of uncontrolled myeloproliferation. Both drugs were administered outside clinical trials. At 48 weeks, a significant reduction in leucocyte and platelet counts was observed (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). Additionally, the spleen volume decreased from a median value of 10 cm below the left costal margin (range, 0–10) to 6 cm (range, 0–15). The rate of spleen response increased from 14% at the start of the combination to 45% after 48 weeks. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with that observed with ruxolitinib single agent. These data require further confirmation in large cohorts of patients prospectively assessed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R et al (2016) The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127:2391–2405CrossRefPubMed Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R et al (2016) The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127:2391–2405CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A et al (2009) New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood 113:2895–2901CrossRefPubMed Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A et al (2009) New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood 113:2895–2901CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK et al (2012) JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 366:787–798CrossRefPubMed Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK et al (2012) JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 366:787–798CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, Le Coutre P et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicentre, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. Haematologica 101:1065–1073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, Le Coutre P et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicentre, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. Haematologica 101:1065–1073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ et al (2016) Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia 30:1701–1707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ et al (2016) Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia 30:1701–1707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Palandri F, Palumbo GA, Bonifacio M et al (2017) Baseline factors associated with response to ruxolitinib: an independent study on 408 patients with myelofibrosis. Oncotarget 8:79073–79086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Palandri F, Palumbo GA, Bonifacio M et al (2017) Baseline factors associated with response to ruxolitinib: an independent study on 408 patients with myelofibrosis. Oncotarget 8:79073–79086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Marchetti M, Barosi G, Cervantes F et al (2017) Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations. Leukemia 31:882–888CrossRefPubMed Marchetti M, Barosi G, Cervantes F et al (2017) Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations. Leukemia 31:882–888CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM et al (2018) Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia 32:1057–1069CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM et al (2018) Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia 32:1057–1069CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Martinez-Trillos A, Gaya A, Maffioli M et al (2010) Efficacy and tolerability of hydroxyurea in the treatment of the hyperproliferative manifestations of myelofibrosis: results in 40 patients. Ann Hematol 89:1233–1237CrossRefPubMed Martinez-Trillos A, Gaya A, Maffioli M et al (2010) Efficacy and tolerability of hydroxyurea in the treatment of the hyperproliferative manifestations of myelofibrosis: results in 40 patients. Ann Hematol 89:1233–1237CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM et al (2010) A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood 115:1703–1708CrossRefPubMed Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM et al (2010) A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood 115:1703–1708CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA et al (2009) The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 114:937–951CrossRefPubMed Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA et al (2009) The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 114:937–951CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R et al (2013) Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood 122:1395–1398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R et al (2013) Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood 122:1395–1398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL et al (2012) Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol 30:4098–4103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL et al (2012) Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol 30:4098–4103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Polverelli N, Catani L, Vianelli N et al (2015) Ruxolitinib-but not fedratinib-induced extreme thrombocytosis: the combination therapy with hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib is effective in reducing platelet count and splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms. Ann Hematol 94:1585–1587CrossRefPubMed Polverelli N, Catani L, Vianelli N et al (2015) Ruxolitinib-but not fedratinib-induced extreme thrombocytosis: the combination therapy with hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib is effective in reducing platelet count and splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms. Ann Hematol 94:1585–1587CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cerchione C, Peluso I, Nappi D et al (2017) Ruxolitinib rechallenge in combination with hydroxyurea is effective in reverting cachexia and reducing blood transfusion demand and splenomegaly symptoms in a patient with primary myelofibrosis. Ann Hematol 296:697–699CrossRef Cerchione C, Peluso I, Nappi D et al (2017) Ruxolitinib rechallenge in combination with hydroxyurea is effective in reverting cachexia and reducing blood transfusion demand and splenomegaly symptoms in a patient with primary myelofibrosis. Ann Hematol 296:697–699CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Caocci G, Ghiani S, Mocci C, La Nasa G (2018) Combination therapy with ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea for the treatment of myeloid-predominant leucocytosis in a patient with myelofibrosis. Acta Haematol 139:164–165CrossRefPubMed Caocci G, Ghiani S, Mocci C, La Nasa G (2018) Combination therapy with ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea for the treatment of myeloid-predominant leucocytosis in a patient with myelofibrosis. Acta Haematol 139:164–165CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea combination in patients with hyperproliferative myelofibrosis
Publication date
01-08-2019
Keyword
Ruxolitinib
Published in
Annals of Hematology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03727-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Annals of Hematology 8/2019 Go to the issue