Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Article

White-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects

Authors: Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno, Daniel Sanchez-Zuriaga, Francisco Martinez-Soriano

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This report assesses white-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values in a large sample of emmetropic subjects.

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-nine eyes of 379 young healthy emmetropic subjects were analyzed by means of scanning-slit corneal topography. The age of the subjects ranged from 18 to 53 years (mean ± SD = 29 ± 7). The mean of five consecutive measurements of the central corneal thickness, the thinnest corneal thickness, the white-to-white corneal diameter, and the photopic pupil diameter was recorded.

Results

The central corneal thickness ranged from 528 to 588 μm; the thinnest corneal thickness ranged from 504 to 574 μm; the white-to-white corneal diameter ranged from 11.5 to 12.3 mm; and the pupil diameter ranged from 3.0 to 4.7 mm. The central and the thinnest corneal thickness were positively correlated (r = 0.94, p < 0.001), and the pupil diameter was significantly higher in females (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study shows that there are no differences in white-to-white corneal diameter, central corneal thickness, and thinnest corneal thickness between emmetropic females and males. However, pupil diameters are greater in emmetropic females.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cairns G, McGhee CN (2005) Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:205–220 (Review)PubMedCrossRef Cairns G, McGhee CN (2005) Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:205–220 (Review)PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chaidaroon W, Juwattanasomran W (2002) Colvard pupillometer measurement of scotopic pupil diameter in emmetropes and myopes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 46:640–644PubMedCrossRef Chaidaroon W, Juwattanasomran W (2002) Colvard pupillometer measurement of scotopic pupil diameter in emmetropes and myopes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 46:640–644PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cosar BC, Sener BA (2003) Orbscan corneal topography system in evaluating the anterior structures of the human eye. Cornea 22:118–121PubMedCrossRef Cosar BC, Sener BA (2003) Orbscan corneal topography system in evaluating the anterior structures of the human eye. Cornea 22:118–121PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Doughty MJ, Jonuscheit S (2010) The orbscan acoustic (correction) factor for central corneal thickness measures of normal human corneas. Eye Contact Lens 36:106–115PubMedCrossRef Doughty MJ, Jonuscheit S (2010) The orbscan acoustic (correction) factor for central corneal thickness measures of normal human corneas. Eye Contact Lens 36:106–115PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408PubMedCrossRef Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fea AM, Annetta F, Cirillo S, Campanella D, De Giuseppe M, Regge D, Grignolo FM (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and Orbscan assessment of the anterior chamber. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1713–1718PubMedCrossRef Fea AM, Annetta F, Cirillo S, Campanella D, De Giuseppe M, Regge D, Grignolo FM (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and Orbscan assessment of the anterior chamber. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1713–1718PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Findl O (2005) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:61–64 (Review)PubMedCrossRef Findl O (2005) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:61–64 (Review)PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goldsmith JA, Li Y, Chalita MR, Westphal V, Patil CA, Rollins AM, Izatt JA, Huang D (2005) Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 112:238–244PubMedCrossRef Goldsmith JA, Li Y, Chalita MR, Westphal V, Patil CA, Rollins AM, Izatt JA, Huang D (2005) Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 112:238–244PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hammond MD, Madigan WP Jr, Bower KS (2005) Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000–2003. Ophthalmology 112:184–190PubMedCrossRef Hammond MD, Madigan WP Jr, Bower KS (2005) Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000–2003. Ophthalmology 112:184–190PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hashemi H, Roshani M, Mehravaran S, Parsafar H, Yazdani K (2007) Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1694–1700PubMedCrossRef Hashemi H, Roshani M, Mehravaran S, Parsafar H, Yazdani K (2007) Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1694–1700PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference La Rosa FA, Gross RL, Orengo-Nania S (2001) Central corneal thickness of Caucasian and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol 119:23–27PubMed La Rosa FA, Gross RL, Orengo-Nania S (2001) Central corneal thickness of Caucasian and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol 119:23–27PubMed
13.
go back to reference Liang YB, Wong TY, Sun LP, Tao QS, Wang JJ, Yang XH, Xiong Y, Wang NL, Friedman DS (2009) Refractive errors in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan eye study. Ophthalmology 116:2119–2127PubMedCrossRef Liang YB, Wong TY, Sun LP, Tao QS, Wang JJ, Yang XH, Xiong Y, Wang NL, Friedman DS (2009) Refractive errors in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan eye study. Ophthalmology 116:2119–2127PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T (2000) Distribution of refractive errors in Spain. Doc Ophthalmol 101:25–33PubMedCrossRef Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T (2000) Distribution of refractive errors in Spain. Doc Ophthalmol 101:25–33PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ostadimoghaddam H, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Heravian J, Rezvan F, Ghadimi H, Rezvan B, Khabazkhoob M (2011) Prevalence of the refractive errors by age and gender in Mashhad, Iran: the Mashhad eye study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02584.x Ostadimoghaddam H, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Heravian J, Rezvan F, Ghadimi H, Rezvan B, Khabazkhoob M (2011) Prevalence of the refractive errors by age and gender in Mashhad, Iran: the Mashhad eye study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. doi: 10.​1111/​j.​1442-9071.​2011.​02584.​x
16.
go back to reference Price FW, Koller DL, Price MO (1999) Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 106:2216–2220PubMedCrossRef Price FW, Koller DL, Price MO (1999) Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 106:2216–2220PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Frisch IB, Auffarth GU (2003) Anterior chamber depth in relation to refractive status measured with the Orbscan II topography system. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2115–2121PubMedCrossRef Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Frisch IB, Auffarth GU (2003) Anterior chamber depth in relation to refractive status measured with the Orbscan II topography system. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2115–2121PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rüfer F, Schröder A, Erb C (2005) White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 24:259–261PubMedCrossRef Rüfer F, Schröder A, Erb C (2005) White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 24:259–261PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Herrera M, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS (2006) Quantitative corneal anatomy in emmetropic subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:235–238PubMed Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Herrera M, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS (2006) Quantitative corneal anatomy in emmetropic subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:235–238PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Herrera M, Sanchez-del-Campo F, Martinez-Soriano F (2006) Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes. Surg Radiol Anat 28:267–270PubMedCrossRef Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Herrera M, Sanchez-del-Campo F, Martinez-Soriano F (2006) Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes. Surg Radiol Anat 28:267–270PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez-Soriano F (2005) Corneal endothelial cell density decreases with age in emmetropic eyes. Histol Histopathol 20:423–427PubMed Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez-Soriano F (2005) Corneal endothelial cell density decreases with age in emmetropic eyes. Histol Histopathol 20:423–427PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez-Soriano F (2004) Anatomic study of the corneal thickness of young emmetropic subjects. Cornea 23:669–673PubMedCrossRef Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez-Soriano F (2004) Anatomic study of the corneal thickness of young emmetropic subjects. Cornea 23:669–673PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Selovic A, Juresa V, Ivankovic D, Malcic D, Bobonj GS (2005) Relationship between axial length of the emmetropic eye and the age, body height, and body weight of schoolchildren. Am J Hum Biol 17:173–177PubMedCrossRef Selovic A, Juresa V, Ivankovic D, Malcic D, Bobonj GS (2005) Relationship between axial length of the emmetropic eye and the age, body height, and body weight of schoolchildren. Am J Hum Biol 17:173–177PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K, Sakabe I, Iwase A, Amano S, Araie M (2003) Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1313–1318PubMedCrossRef Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K, Sakabe I, Iwase A, Amano S, Araie M (2003) Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1313–1318PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Twa MD, Bailey MD, Hayes J, Bullimore M (2004) Estimation of pupil size by digital photography. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:381–389PubMedCrossRef Twa MD, Bailey MD, Hayes J, Bullimore M (2004) Estimation of pupil size by digital photography. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:381–389PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Phillips NJ (1994) Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:1132–1137PubMed Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Phillips NJ (1994) Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:1132–1137PubMed
27.
go back to reference Yekta AA, Fotouhi A, Khabazkhoob M, Hashemi H, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, Mehravaran S (2009) The prevalence of refractive errors and its determinants in the elderly population of Mashhad, Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 16:198–203PubMedCrossRef Yekta AA, Fotouhi A, Khabazkhoob M, Hashemi H, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, Mehravaran S (2009) The prevalence of refractive errors and its determinants in the elderly population of Mashhad, Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 16:198–203PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
White-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects
Authors
Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno
Daniel Sanchez-Zuriaga
Francisco Martinez-Soriano
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0889-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2/2012 Go to the issue