Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 3/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes

Authors: Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno, Manuel Herrera, Franzisco Sánchez-del-Campo, Francisco Martínez-Soriano

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Assessment of ocular dimensions is essential for ophthalmic surgeons because these values must be determined before scheduling excimer laser refractive and cataract surgeries. Dry eye seems to affect central corneal thickness (CCT) values, but it is not clear if it affects anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), vitreous chamber depth (VCD) and axial length values. Following on from this, we measured the CCT, ACD, LT, VCD and axial length of 64 healthy eyes (51.20%) and 61 dry eyes (48.80%). CCT was measured with scanning-slit corneal topography (Orbscan Topography System II, Orbscan, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA) and ACD, LT, VCD and axial length with a 10-MHz A-mode ultrasound device (Compuscan; Storz, St. Louis, MO, USA). There were no significant differences in ACD (P=0.588), LT (P=0.739), VCD (P=0.568) and axial length (P=0.199) between normal and dry eyes. Nevertheless, the differences in CCT between normal (549±34 μm) and dry eyes (527±30 μm) were significant (P<0.001). In sum, it seems that only the CCT values are significantly lower in subjects with dry eye.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d’Athis P (1999) Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237:220–224CrossRef Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d’Athis P (1999) Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237:220–224CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Copt R, Thomas R, Mermoud A (1999) Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open angle glaucoma, and normal pressure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 117:14–16PubMed Copt R, Thomas R, Mermoud A (1999) Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open angle glaucoma, and normal pressure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 117:14–16PubMed
3.
go back to reference Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408 (review) Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408 (review)
4.
go back to reference Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53:34–43CrossRef Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53:34–43CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL (2001) Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea 20:480–483PubMedCrossRef Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL (2001) Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea 20:480–483PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Findl O (2005) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:61–64 (review) Findl O (2005) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:61–64 (review)
7.
go back to reference Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al (2002) The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:714–720PubMed Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al (2002) The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:714–720PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hammond MD, Madigan WP Jr, Bower KS (2005) Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000–2003. Ophthalmology 112:184–190PubMedCrossRef Hammond MD, Madigan WP Jr, Bower KS (2005) Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000–2003. Ophthalmology 112:184–190PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hosny MH, Alió JL, Claramonte P, Attia WH, Pérez-Santonja JJ (2000) Relationship between anterior chamber depth, refractive state, corneal diameter and axial length. J Refract Surg 16:336–340PubMed Hosny MH, Alió JL, Claramonte P, Attia WH, Pérez-Santonja JJ (2000) Relationship between anterior chamber depth, refractive state, corneal diameter and axial length. J Refract Surg 16:336–340PubMed
10.
go back to reference Johnson M, Kass MA, Moses RA, Grodzki WJ (1978) Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 96:664–665PubMed Johnson M, Kass MA, Moses RA, Grodzki WJ (1978) Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 96:664–665PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lattimore MR, Kaupp S, Schallhorn S et al (1999) Orbscan pachymetry: diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology 106:977–981PubMedCrossRef Lattimore MR, Kaupp S, Schallhorn S et al (1999) Orbscan pachymetry: diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology 106:977–981PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM (2003) Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Ophthalmology 110:1096–1101PubMedCrossRef Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM (2003) Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Ophthalmology 110:1096–1101PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Marsich MM, Bullimore MA (2000) The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 19:792–795PubMedCrossRef Marsich MM, Bullimore MA (2000) The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 19:792–795PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mills RP (2000) If intraocular pressure measurement is only an estimate-then what? Ophthalmology 107:1807–1808 (guest editorials) Mills RP (2000) If intraocular pressure measurement is only an estimate-then what? Ophthalmology 107:1807–1808 (guest editorials)
16.
go back to reference Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE (2004) Incidence of dry eye in an older population. Arch Ophthalmol 122:369–373PubMedCrossRef Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE (2004) Incidence of dry eye in an older population. Arch Ophthalmol 122:369–373PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ozkagnici A, Buyukmumcu M, Zengin N, Gunduz K, Koc H (2001) Ocular and periorbital anthropometric measurements in term Turkish newborns. Surg Radiol Anat 23:321–324PubMedCrossRef Ozkagnici A, Buyukmumcu M, Zengin N, Gunduz K, Koc H (2001) Ocular and periorbital anthropometric measurements in term Turkish newborns. Surg Radiol Anat 23:321–324PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Price FW, Koller DL, Price MO (1999) Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 106:2216–2220PubMedCrossRef Price FW, Koller DL, Price MO (1999) Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 106:2216–2220PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez-Soriano F (2005) Reduced corneal thickness values in postmenopausal women with dry eye. Cornea 24:39–44PubMedCrossRef Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez-Soriano F (2005) Reduced corneal thickness values in postmenopausal women with dry eye. Cornea 24:39–44PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R et al (2000) Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107:1191–1193PubMedCrossRef Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R et al (2000) Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107:1191–1193PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R (2005) Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the los angeles latino eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4450–4460PubMedCrossRef Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R (2005) Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the los angeles latino eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4450–4460PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Singh RS, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Sharma A, Mohsin M (2001) Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 10:206–210PubMedCrossRef Singh RS, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Sharma A, Mohsin M (2001) Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 10:206–210PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K et al (2003) Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1313–1318PubMedCrossRef Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K et al (2003) Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1313–1318PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yaylali V, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW (1997) Corneal thickness measurements with the orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1345–1350PubMed Yaylali V, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW (1997) Corneal thickness measurements with the orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1345–1350PubMed
Metadata
Title
Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes
Authors
Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno
Manuel Herrera
Franzisco Sánchez-del-Campo
Francisco Martínez-Soriano
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0076-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 3/2006 Go to the issue