Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2010

01-02-2010 | Clinical Investigation

Effect of Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Media on Natural Course of End-Stage Renal Disease Progression in Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Study

Authors: Radim Janousek, Antonin Krajina, Jan H. Peregrin, Sylvie Dusilova-Sulkova, Ondrej Renc, Jan Hajek, Kamil Dvorak, Petr Fixa, Eva Cermakova

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of intravascular iodinated contrast medium on residual diuresis in hemodialyzed patients. Two groups of clinically stable hemodialyzed patients with residual diuresis minimally 500 ml of urine per day were studied. The patients from the first group were given iso-osmolal contrast agent iodixanol (Visipaque, GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) in concentration of iodine 320 mg/ml with osmolality 290 mOsm/kg of water during the endovascular procedure. The second control group was followed without contrast medium administered. Residual diuresis and residual renal excretory capacity expressed as 24-h calculated creatinine clearance were evaluated in the both groups after 6 months. The evaluated group included 42 patients who were given 99.3 ml of iodixanol in average (range, 60–180 ml). The control group included 45 patients. There was no statistically significant difference found between both groups in daily volume of urine (P = 0.855) and calculated clearance of creatinine (P = 0.573). We can conclude that residual diuresis is not significantly influenced by intravascular administration of iso-osmolal iodinated contrast agent (iodixanol) in range of volume from 60 to 180 ml in comparison to natural course of urinary output and residual renal function during end-stage renal disease. This result can help the nephrologist to decide which imaging method/contrast medium to use in dialyzed patients in current practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (1999) Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 9:1602–1613CrossRefPubMed Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (1999) Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 9:1602–1613CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rodby RA (2007) Preventing complications of radiographic contrast media: is there a role for dialysis? Semin Dialysis 20:19–23CrossRef Rodby RA (2007) Preventing complications of radiographic contrast media: is there a role for dialysis? Semin Dialysis 20:19–23CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Michaely HJ, Thomsen HS, Reiser MF et al (2007) Nephrogene systemische Fibrose (NSF)—Implikationen für die Radiologie. Radiologe 47:785–793CrossRefPubMed Michaely HJ, Thomsen HS, Reiser MF et al (2007) Nephrogene systemische Fibrose (NSF)—Implikationen für die Radiologie. Radiologe 47:785–793CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Micah RCh et al (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factor and incidence estimation. Radiology 243:148–157CrossRefPubMed Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Micah RCh et al (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factor and incidence estimation. Radiology 243:148–157CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weinreb JC (2008) Which study when? Is gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging safer than iodine-enhanced CT? Radiology 249:3–8CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC (2008) Which study when? Is gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging safer than iodine-enhanced CT? Radiology 249:3–8CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Halvorsen RA (2008) Which study when? Iodinated contrast enhanced CT versus gadolinium enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 249:9–15CrossRefPubMed Halvorsen RA (2008) Which study when? Iodinated contrast enhanced CT versus gadolinium enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 249:9–15CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Diego MR (2008) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a radiologist’s practical perspective. Eur J Radiol 66:220–224CrossRef Diego MR (2008) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a radiologist’s practical perspective. Eur J Radiol 66:220–224CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Broome DR, Girugis MS, Baron PW et al (2007) Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:586–592CrossRefPubMed Broome DR, Girugis MS, Baron PW et al (2007) Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:586–592CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chandra SM, Farrington K (2004) Residual renal function: considerations on its importance and preservation in dialysis patients. Semin Dial 17:196–201CrossRef Chandra SM, Farrington K (2004) Residual renal function: considerations on its importance and preservation in dialysis patients. Semin Dial 17:196–201CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shemin D, Bostom AG, Laliberty P et al (2001) Residual renal function and mortality risk in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 38:85–90CrossRefPubMed Shemin D, Bostom AG, Laliberty P et al (2001) Residual renal function and mortality risk in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 38:85–90CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dittrich E, Puttinger H, Schillinger M et al (2006) Effect of radio contrast media on residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1334–1339CrossRefPubMed Dittrich E, Puttinger H, Schillinger M et al (2006) Effect of radio contrast media on residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1334–1339CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moranne O, Willoteaux S, Pagniez D et al (2006) Effect of iodinated contrast agents on residual renal function in PD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1040–1045CrossRefPubMed Moranne O, Willoteaux S, Pagniez D et al (2006) Effect of iodinated contrast agents on residual renal function in PD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1040–1045CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weisbord SD, Bernardini JU, Mor MK et al (2006) The effect coronary angiography on residual renal function in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Clin Cardiol 29:494–497CrossRefPubMed Weisbord SD, Bernardini JU, Mor MK et al (2006) The effect coronary angiography on residual renal function in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Clin Cardiol 29:494–497CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hamani A, Petitclerc T, Jacobs C et al (1998) Is dialysis indicated immediately after administration of iodinated contrast agents in patients on haemodialysis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:1052–1053CrossRef Hamani A, Petitclerc T, Jacobs C et al (1998) Is dialysis indicated immediately after administration of iodinated contrast agents in patients on haemodialysis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:1052–1053CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harazawa Z, Zamazali C, Mazuki K (1990) Side effects and pharmacokinetics of non ionic contrast medium in hemodialysed patients. Nippon Igazku Hoashasen Gakkai Zasshi 50:1524–1531 Harazawa Z, Zamazali C, Mazuki K (1990) Side effects and pharmacokinetics of non ionic contrast medium in hemodialysed patients. Nippon Igazku Hoashasen Gakkai Zasshi 50:1524–1531
16.
go back to reference Vogt B, Ferrari P, Schonholzer C et al (2001) Prophylactic haemodialysis after radiocontrast media in patients with renal insufficiency is potentially harmful. Am J Med 111:692–698CrossRefPubMed Vogt B, Ferrari P, Schonholzer C et al (2001) Prophylactic haemodialysis after radiocontrast media in patients with renal insufficiency is potentially harmful. Am J Med 111:692–698CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association (2002) Measurement of renal function: when to refer and when to start dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(suppl 7):7–15 European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association (2002) Measurement of renal function: when to refer and when to start dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(suppl 7):7–15
18.
go back to reference The National Kidney Foundation (2006) NKF-K/DQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations 2006 updates. I. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy. Guideline 6. Preservation of residual kidney function. Am J Kidney Dis 48(suppl 1):40–41 The National Kidney Foundation (2006) NKF-K/DQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations 2006 updates. I. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy. Guideline 6. Preservation of residual kidney function. Am J Kidney Dis 48(suppl 1):40–41
19.
go back to reference Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG et al (2004) Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:1061–1070CrossRefPubMed Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG et al (2004) Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:1061–1070CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Suda T, Hiroshige K, Ohta T et al (2000) The contribution of residual renal function on overall nutritional status in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:396–401CrossRefPubMed Suda T, Hiroshige K, Ohta T et al (2000) The contribution of residual renal function on overall nutritional status in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:396–401CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Horl MP, Horl WH (2002) Hemodialysis-associated hypertension: pathophysiology and therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 39:227–244CrossRefPubMed Horl MP, Horl WH (2002) Hemodialysis-associated hypertension: pathophysiology and therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 39:227–244CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Morduchowicz G, Winkler J, Zabludowski JR et al (1994) Effects of residual renal function in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 26:125–131CrossRefPubMed Morduchowicz G, Winkler J, Zabludowski JR et al (1994) Effects of residual renal function in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 26:125–131CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Erkan E, Moritz M, Kaskel F (2001) Impact of residual renal function in children on hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 16:858–861CrossRefPubMed Erkan E, Moritz M, Kaskel F (2001) Impact of residual renal function in children on hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 16:858–861CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pickett TM, Crusickshank A, Greenwood RN et al (2002) Membrane flux not biocompatibility determines Beta-2-microglobulin levels in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 20:161–166CrossRefPubMed Pickett TM, Crusickshank A, Greenwood RN et al (2002) Membrane flux not biocompatibility determines Beta-2-microglobulin levels in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 20:161–166CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Canaud B, Chenine L, Leray-Moraques H et al (2006) Residual renal function and dialysis modality: is it really beneficial to preserve residual renal function in dialysis patients? Nephrology 11:292–296CrossRefPubMed Canaud B, Chenine L, Leray-Moraques H et al (2006) Residual renal function and dialysis modality: is it really beneficial to preserve residual renal function in dialysis patients? Nephrology 11:292–296CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Van Olden RW, van Acker AC, Koomen GCM et al (1995) Time course of inulin and creatinine clearance in the interval between two hemodialysis treatments. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:2274–2280PubMed Van Olden RW, van Acker AC, Koomen GCM et al (1995) Time course of inulin and creatinine clearance in the interval between two hemodialysis treatments. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:2274–2280PubMed
27.
go back to reference Swan S, Halstenson CH, Kasiske B et al (1996) Determination of residual renal function with iohexol clearance in hemodialysis. Kidney Int 49:232–235CrossRefPubMed Swan S, Halstenson CH, Kasiske B et al (1996) Determination of residual renal function with iohexol clearance in hemodialysis. Kidney Int 49:232–235CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Krediet RT (2006) How to preserve residual renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(suppl 2):ii42–ii46CrossRefPubMed Krediet RT (2006) How to preserve residual renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(suppl 2):ii42–ii46CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hoek F, Korevaar J, Dekker F et al (2007) Estimation of residual glomerular filtration rate in dialysis patients from the plasma cystatin C level. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:1633–1638CrossRefPubMed Hoek F, Korevaar J, Dekker F et al (2007) Estimation of residual glomerular filtration rate in dialysis patients from the plasma cystatin C level. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:1633–1638CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Deray G (2006) Dialysis and iodinated contrast media. Kidney Int 69:S25–S29CrossRef Deray G (2006) Dialysis and iodinated contrast media. Kidney Int 69:S25–S29CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Dawson P (2002) Contrast agents in patients on dialysis. Semin Dial 15:232–236CrossRef Dawson P (2002) Contrast agents in patients on dialysis. Semin Dial 15:232–236CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Eley CM (1999) Does hydration prevent radiocontrast-induced acute renal failure? Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1064–1066CrossRef Eley CM (1999) Does hydration prevent radiocontrast-induced acute renal failure? Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1064–1066CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aspelin P, Aubry P, Frannson SG (2003) Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 348:491–499CrossRefPubMed Aspelin P, Aubry P, Frannson SG (2003) Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 348:491–499CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (2002) Dialysis and contrast media. Eur Radiol 12:3026–3030PubMed Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (2002) Dialysis and contrast media. Eur Radiol 12:3026–3030PubMed
35.
go back to reference Yuonathan CM, Kaude JV, Cook MD et al (1994) Dialysis is not indicated immediately after administration of non-ionic contrast agents in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by maintenance dialysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:969–971 Yuonathan CM, Kaude JV, Cook MD et al (1994) Dialysis is not indicated immediately after administration of non-ionic contrast agents in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by maintenance dialysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:969–971
36.
go back to reference Barret BJ, Katzberg RW, Thomsen HS et al (2006) Contrast induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography. A double blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol. Invest Radiol 41:815–821CrossRef Barret BJ, Katzberg RW, Thomsen HS et al (2006) Contrast induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography. A double blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol. Invest Radiol 41:815–821CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Briguori C, Kolombo A, Airoldi F et al (2005) Nephrotoxicity of low-osmolality versus iso-osmolality contrast agents: impact of N-acetylcysteine. Kidney Int 68:2250–2255CrossRefPubMed Briguori C, Kolombo A, Airoldi F et al (2005) Nephrotoxicity of low-osmolality versus iso-osmolality contrast agents: impact of N-acetylcysteine. Kidney Int 68:2250–2255CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Sang-ho J, Yuon TJ, Koo BK et al (2006) Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between Visipaque (iodixanol) and Hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography. The RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:924–930CrossRef Sang-ho J, Yuon TJ, Koo BK et al (2006) Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between Visipaque (iodixanol) and Hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography. The RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:924–930CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kuhn MJ, Chen N, Sahani DV et al (2008) The PREDICT study: a randomized double-blind comparison of contrast-induced nephropathy after low- or isoosmolar contrast agent exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:151–157CrossRefPubMed Kuhn MJ, Chen N, Sahani DV et al (2008) The PREDICT study: a randomized double-blind comparison of contrast-induced nephropathy after low- or isoosmolar contrast agent exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:151–157CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Media on Natural Course of End-Stage Renal Disease Progression in Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Study
Authors
Radim Janousek
Antonin Krajina
Jan H. Peregrin
Sylvie Dusilova-Sulkova
Ondrej Renc
Jan Hajek
Kamil Dvorak
Petr Fixa
Eva Cermakova
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9715-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2010 Go to the issue