Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2021

01-08-2021 | Pancreatoduodenostomy | Original Scientific Report

Quality of Recovery of Patients Who Underwent Curative Pancreatectomy: Comparison of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia Using the QOR-40 Questionnaire

Authors: Young-Eun Joe, Chang Moo Kang, Hye-Mi Lee, Ki-Jun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Jeong-Rim Lee

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There has been increasing attention on the subjective recovery of patients undergoing cancer surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhaled anesthesia with volatile anesthetics (INHA) are safe and common anesthetic techniques. Currently, TIVA and INHA have only been compared for less invasive and less complex surgeries. This prospective randomized trial aimed to compare the quality of recovery between TIVA and INHA in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the Quality of Recovery (QOR)-40 questionnaire.

Methods

We enrolled 132 patients who were randomly assigned to either the desflurane (DES) (INHA, balanced anesthesia with DES and remifentanil infusion) or TIVA (effect-site target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil) groups and completed the QOR-40 questionnaire postoperatively.

Results

The mean global QOR-40 score on postoperative day 3 was significantly higher in the TIVA group than in the DES group. In the PD group, the total QOR-40 score was significantly higher in the TIVA group than in the DES group. Moreover, the TIVA group had significantly higher scores in the physical comfort and psychological support QOR-40 dimensions than the DES group.

Conclusion

TIVA provides better quality of recovery scores on POD 3 for patients undergoing curative pancreatectomy.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT03447691
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shulman M, Myles P (2016) Measuring perioperative outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 29(6):733–738CrossRef Shulman M, Myles P (2016) Measuring perioperative outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 29(6):733–738CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer Statistics, CA: A Cancer. Journal for Clinicians 60(5):277–300CrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer Statistics, CA: A Cancer. Journal for Clinicians 60(5):277–300CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Li M, Wang X, Shen R, Wang S, Zhu D (2020) Advancing the time to the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and improving postoperative outcome: enhanced recovery after surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 86(4):293–299CrossRef Li M, Wang X, Shen R, Wang S, Zhu D (2020) Advancing the time to the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and improving postoperative outcome: enhanced recovery after surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 86(4):293–299CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee WK, Kim MS, Kang SW, Kim S, Lee JR (2015) Type of anaesthesia and patient quality of recovery: a randomized trial comparing propofol–remifentanil total i.v. anaesthesia with desflurane anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 114(4):663–668CrossRef Lee WK, Kim MS, Kang SW, Kim S, Lee JR (2015) Type of anaesthesia and patient quality of recovery: a randomized trial comparing propofol–remifentanil total i.v. anaesthesia with desflurane anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 114(4):663–668CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Liu T, Gu Y, Chen K, Shen X (2019) Quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery after general anesthesia: total intravenous anesthesia vs desflurane anesthesia. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(3):248–254CrossRef Liu T, Gu Y, Chen K, Shen X (2019) Quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery after general anesthesia: total intravenous anesthesia vs desflurane anesthesia. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(3):248–254CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Na SH, Jeong KH, Eum D, Park JH, Kim MS (2018) Patient quality of recovery on the day of surgery after propofol total intravenous anesthesia for vitrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(40):e12699CrossRef Na SH, Jeong KH, Eum D, Park JH, Kim MS (2018) Patient quality of recovery on the day of surgery after propofol total intravenous anesthesia for vitrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(40):e12699CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Miller D, Lewis SR, Pritchard MW et al (2018) Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8):Cd012317PubMed Miller D, Lewis SR, Pritchard MW et al (2018) Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8):Cd012317PubMed
8.
go back to reference Elbakry AE, Sultan WE, Ibrahim E (2018) A comparison between inhalational (Desflurane) and total intravenous anaesthesia (Propofol and dexmedetomidine) in improving postoperative recovery for morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 45:6–11CrossRef Elbakry AE, Sultan WE, Ibrahim E (2018) A comparison between inhalational (Desflurane) and total intravenous anaesthesia (Propofol and dexmedetomidine) in improving postoperative recovery for morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 45:6–11CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lin WL, Lee MS, Wong CS et al (2019) Effects of intraoperative propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pain in spine surgery: Comparison with desflurane anesthesia - a randomised trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(13):e15074CrossRef Lin WL, Lee MS, Wong CS et al (2019) Effects of intraoperative propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pain in spine surgery: Comparison with desflurane anesthesia - a randomised trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(13):e15074CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zheng X, Wang Y, Dong L et al (2018) Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Onco Targets Ther 11:1141–1148CrossRef Zheng X, Wang Y, Dong L et al (2018) Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Onco Targets Ther 11:1141–1148CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wigmore TJ, Mohammed K, Jhanji S (2016) Long-term survival for patients undergoing volatile versus IV anesthesia for cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis. Anesthesiology 124(1):69–79CrossRef Wigmore TJ, Mohammed K, Jhanji S (2016) Long-term survival for patients undergoing volatile versus IV anesthesia for cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis. Anesthesiology 124(1):69–79CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Soltanizadeh S, Degett TH, Gögenur I (2017) Outcomes of cancer surgery after inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: A systematic review. J Clin Anesth 42:19–25CrossRef Soltanizadeh S, Degett TH, Gögenur I (2017) Outcomes of cancer surgery after inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: A systematic review. J Clin Anesth 42:19–25CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yap A, Lopez-Olivo MA, Dubowitz J et al (2019) Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie 66(5):546–561CrossRef Yap A, Lopez-Olivo MA, Dubowitz J et al (2019) Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie 66(5):546–561CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE et al (1999) Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 88(1):83–90PubMed Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE et al (1999) Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 88(1):83–90PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL et al (2013) Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth 111(2):161–169CrossRef Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL et al (2013) Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth 111(2):161–169CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F (2007) A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 105(1):63–69CrossRef Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F (2007) A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 105(1):63–69CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A (2016) Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. Anesthesiology 125(1):39–45CrossRef Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A (2016) Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. Anesthesiology 125(1):39–45CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S (2001) Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 95(4):862–867CrossRef Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S (2001) Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 95(4):862–867CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Myles PS, Viira D, Hunt JO (2006) Quality of life at three years after cardiac surgery: relationship with preoperative status and quality of recovery. Anaesth Intensive Care 34(2):176–183CrossRef Myles PS, Viira D, Hunt JO (2006) Quality of life at three years after cardiac surgery: relationship with preoperative status and quality of recovery. Anaesth Intensive Care 34(2):176–183CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Xia WF, Liu Y, Zhou QS, Tang QZ, Zou HD (2011) Comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on inflammation and oxidase stress in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. Yonsei Med J 52(2):326–332CrossRef Xia WF, Liu Y, Zhou QS, Tang QZ, Zou HD (2011) Comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on inflammation and oxidase stress in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. Yonsei Med J 52(2):326–332CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Braz MG, Braz LG, Braz JR et al (2013) Comparison of oxidative stress in ASA physical status I patients scheduled for minimally invasive surgery under balanced or intravenous anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 79(9):1030–1038PubMed Braz MG, Braz LG, Braz JR et al (2013) Comparison of oxidative stress in ASA physical status I patients scheduled for minimally invasive surgery under balanced or intravenous anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 79(9):1030–1038PubMed
23.
go back to reference Özkan D, Akkaya T, Yalcindag A et al (2013) Propofol sedation in total knee replacement: effects on oxidative stress and ischemia-reperfusion damage. Anaesthesist 62(7):537–542CrossRef Özkan D, Akkaya T, Yalcindag A et al (2013) Propofol sedation in total knee replacement: effects on oxidative stress and ischemia-reperfusion damage. Anaesthesist 62(7):537–542CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality of Recovery of Patients Who Underwent Curative Pancreatectomy: Comparison of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia Using the QOR-40 Questionnaire
Authors
Young-Eun Joe
Chang Moo Kang
Hye-Mi Lee
Ki-Jun Kim
Ho Kyoung Hwang
Jeong-Rim Lee
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06117-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

World Journal of Surgery 8/2021 Go to the issue