Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Original Scientific Report

Pharyngeal Pouch Surgery in Octo- and Nonagenarians is Safe and Effective: A Multicentre Comparative Cohort Study

Authors: Mohamed Afzal, David S. Liu, Tim Bright, David I. Watson, Peter G. Devitt, Sarah K. Thompson

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery is the only effective treatment strategy for a symptomatic pharyngeal pouch. However, octo- and nonagenarians are often denied referral to a surgeon because of perceived increased risks. Here, we compare the outcomes of pharyngeal pouch surgery in octo- and nonagenarians with patients under 80 years-of-age and determine the factors which predict post-operative complications and improvement in swallowing.

Methods

Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent pharyngeal pouch surgery across seven hospitals over 15 years.

Results

In total, 113 patients (≥80 years-of-age: 27, <80 years-of-age: 86) underwent endoscopic or open pharyngeal pouch surgery. Despite more comorbidities and a longer hospital stay (median: one extra day), patients ≥80 years-of-age had comparable operative time, complication profile, intensive care admission, emergency reoperation, and revisional pouch surgery as their younger counterparts. Furthermore, the severity of complications was not significantly different between the two age cohorts. No surgical mortality was recorded. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diverticulectomy combined with cricopharyngeal myotomy independently predicted higher rates of complications (OR: 4.53, 95% CI: 1.43–14.33, p = 0.010), but also greater symptomatic improvement (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.50–12.67, p = 0.007). Importantly, a greater proportion of octo- and nonagenarians experienced improved swallowing than patients <80 years-of-age (96.3% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.013). Moreover, advanced age was not predictive of post-operative complications on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Pharyngeal pouch surgery in octo- and nonagenarians is safe and effective. Surgical correction in this age group alleviates symptoms and improves quality-of-life for most patients. These patients should not be denied surgery on the basis of advanced age alone.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siddiq MA, Sood S, Strachan D (2001) Pharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s diverticulum). Postgrad Med J 77:506–511CrossRef Siddiq MA, Sood S, Strachan D (2001) Pharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s diverticulum). Postgrad Med J 77:506–511CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Crescenzo DG, Trastek VF, Allen MS et al (1998) Zenker’s diverticulum in the elderly: is operation justified? Ann Thorac Surg 66:347–350CrossRef Crescenzo DG, Trastek VF, Allen MS et al (1998) Zenker’s diverticulum in the elderly: is operation justified? Ann Thorac Surg 66:347–350CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Feeley MA, Righi PD, Weisberger EC et al (1999) Zenker’s diverticulum: analysis of surgical complications from diverticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy. Laryngoscope 109:858–861CrossRef Feeley MA, Righi PD, Weisberger EC et al (1999) Zenker’s diverticulum: analysis of surgical complications from diverticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy. Laryngoscope 109:858–861CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aly A, Devitt PG, Watson DI et al (2004) Endoscopic stapling for pharyngeal pouch: does it make the cut? ANZ J Surg 74:116–121CrossRef Aly A, Devitt PG, Watson DI et al (2004) Endoscopic stapling for pharyngeal pouch: does it make the cut? ANZ J Surg 74:116–121CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB et al (2006) Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB et al (2006) Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carlini M, Dell’Avanzato R, Miercadante E et al (2007) Surgical treatment of a severe, massive, symptomatic Zenker’s diverticulum in a very elderly patient. Chir Italiana 59:397–403 Carlini M, Dell’Avanzato R, Miercadante E et al (2007) Surgical treatment of a severe, massive, symptomatic Zenker’s diverticulum in a very elderly patient. Chir Italiana 59:397–403
7.
go back to reference Onwugbufor MT, Obirieze AC, Ortega G et al (2013) Surgical management of esophageal diverticulum: a review of the nationwide inpatient sample database. J Surg Res 184:120–125CrossRef Onwugbufor MT, Obirieze AC, Ortega G et al (2013) Surgical management of esophageal diverticulum: a review of the nationwide inpatient sample database. J Surg Res 184:120–125CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tabola R, Lewandowski A, Cirocchi R et al (2018) Zenker diverticulum: experience in surgical treatment of large diverticula. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e0557CrossRef Tabola R, Lewandowski A, Cirocchi R et al (2018) Zenker diverticulum: experience in surgical treatment of large diverticula. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e0557CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Liu DS, Cheng C, Islam R et al (2020) Prophylactic negative-pressure dressings reduce wound complications and resource burden after emergency laparotomies. J Surg Res 257:22–31CrossRef Liu DS, Cheng C, Islam R et al (2020) Prophylactic negative-pressure dressings reduce wound complications and resource burden after emergency laparotomies. J Surg Res 257:22–31CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Howell RJ, Giliberto JP, Harmon J et al (2019) Open versus endoscopic surgery of Zenker’s diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dysphagia 34:930–938CrossRef Howell RJ, Giliberto JP, Harmon J et al (2019) Open versus endoscopic surgery of Zenker’s diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dysphagia 34:930–938CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Verdonck J, Morton RP (2015) Systematic review on treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:3095–3107CrossRef Verdonck J, Morton RP (2015) Systematic review on treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:3095–3107CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Crawley B, Dehom S, Tamares S et al (2019) Adverse events after rigid and flexible endoscopic repair of Zenker’s diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 161:388–400CrossRef Crawley B, Dehom S, Tamares S et al (2019) Adverse events after rigid and flexible endoscopic repair of Zenker’s diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 161:388–400CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yuan Y, Zhao YF, Hu Y et al (2013) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Dig Surg 30:207–218CrossRef Yuan Y, Zhao YF, Hu Y et al (2013) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Dig Surg 30:207–218CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chang CW, Burkey BB, Netterville JL et al (2004) Carbon dioxide laser endoscopic diverticulotomy versus open diverticulectomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 114:519–527CrossRef Chang CW, Burkey BB, Netterville JL et al (2004) Carbon dioxide laser endoscopic diverticulotomy versus open diverticulectomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 114:519–527CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharyngeal Pouch Surgery in Octo- and Nonagenarians is Safe and Effective: A Multicentre Comparative Cohort Study
Authors
Mohamed Afzal
David S. Liu
Tim Bright
David I. Watson
Peter G. Devitt
Sarah K. Thompson
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05999-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

World Journal of Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue