Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Pancreatoduodenostomy | Original Scientific Report

Development and Validation of a New Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors: Xi-Tai Huang, Chen-Song Huang, Chen Liu, Wei Chen, Jian-Peng Cai, He Cheng, Xing-Xing Jiang, Li-Jian Liang, Xian-Jun Yu, Xiao-Yu Yin

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There lacks an ideal model for accurately predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed at developing a nomogram with high accuracy in predicting CR-POPF after PD.

Methods

A total of 1182 patients undergoing PD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (FAHSYSU, n = 762) and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC, n = 420) between January 2010 and May 2018 were enrolled. The patients from FAHSYSU were assigned as testing cohort, and those from FUSCC were used as external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors for CR-POPF. Nomogram was developed on the basis of significant predictors. The performance of nomogram was evaluated by area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.

Results

In testing cohort, 87 out of 762 patients developed CR-POPF. Three predictors were significantly associated with CR-POPF, including body mass index ≥24.0 kg/m2, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, and drainage fluid amylase on postoperative day 1 ≥2484 units/L (all p ≤ 0.001). Prediction of nomogram was accurate with AUC of 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.914–0.950) in testing cohort and 0.744 (95% CI: 0.699–0.785) in external validation cohort. The predictive accuracy of nomogram was better than that of previously proposed fistula risk scores both in testing and external validation cohort (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The novel nomogram based on three easily available parameters could accurately predict CR-POPF after PD. It would have high clinical value due to its accuracy and convenience.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kastenberg ZJ, Morton JM, Visser BC et al (2013) Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 15:142–148CrossRef Kastenberg ZJ, Morton JM, Visser BC et al (2013) Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 15:142–148CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S et al (2012) A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 16:89–102 Discussion 102–103CrossRef Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S et al (2012) A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 16:89–102 Discussion 102–103CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM et al (2012) Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg 256:529–537CrossRef Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM et al (2012) Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg 256:529–537CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Denbo JW, Orr WS, Zarzaur BL et al (2012) Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 14:589–593CrossRef Denbo JW, Orr WS, Zarzaur BL et al (2012) Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 14:589–593CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PW et al (1997) Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 226:632–641CrossRef Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PW et al (1997) Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 226:632–641CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ansorge C, Nordin JZ, Lundell L et al (2014) Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:100–108CrossRef Ansorge C, Nordin JZ, Lundell L et al (2014) Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:100–108CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Giglio MC, Spalding DR, Giakoustidis A et al (2016) Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection. Br J Surg 103:328–336CrossRef Giglio MC, Spalding DR, Giakoustidis A et al (2016) Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection. Br J Surg 103:328–336CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRef Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D et al (2019) Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation. Ann Surg 269:937–943CrossRef Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D et al (2019) Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation. Ann Surg 269:937–943CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387CrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387CrossRef
12.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRef DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak Int J Soc Med Decis Mak 26:565–574CrossRef Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak Int J Soc Med Decis Mak 26:565–574CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB et al (2008) Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 8:53CrossRef Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB et al (2008) Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 8:53CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23CrossRef Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chen JY, Feng J, Wang XQ et al (2015) Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 21:5926–5933CrossRef Chen JY, Feng J, Wang XQ et al (2015) Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 21:5926–5933CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roberts KJ, Hodson J, Mehrzad H et al (2014) A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 16:620–628CrossRef Roberts KJ, Hodson J, Mehrzad H et al (2014) A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 16:620–628CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kim JY, Park JS, Kim JK et al (2013) A model for predicting pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the international study group of pancreatic surgery classification. Korean J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surg 17:166–170CrossRef Kim JY, Park JS, Kim JK et al (2013) A model for predicting pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the international study group of pancreatic surgery classification. Korean J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surg 17:166–170CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H et al (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 12:696–702CrossRef Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H et al (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 12:696–702CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Validation of a New Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy
Authors
Xi-Tai Huang
Chen-Song Huang
Chen Liu
Wei Chen
Jian-Peng Cai
He Cheng
Xing-Xing Jiang
Li-Jian Liang
Xian-Jun Yu
Xiao-Yu Yin
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05773-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue