Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Appendicitis | Original Scientific Report

Chronological Changes in Appendiceal Pathology Among Patients Who Underwent Appendectomy for Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Authors: Kota Sugiura, Hideo Miyake, Hidemasa Nagai, Yuichiro Yoshioka, Koji Shibata, Soichiro Asai, Norihiro Yuasa, Masahiko Fujino

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Given recent advances in imaging and the development of diagnostic parameters, the rate of unnecessary appendectomy (i.e., negative appendectomy) has been decreasing. However, the incidence of acute appendicitis (AA) in elderly patients is rising due to the aging of society. We aimed to identify chronological changes in demographics and appendiceal pathology among patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected AA.

Methods

Data from 881 patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected AA between January 2006 and December 2017 were analyzed. The final diagnosis was based on intraoperative findings, pathological reports, and clinical course. Negative appendectomy was defined as the absence of appendiceal diseases including inflammation, fibrosis, and neoplasm. We compared demographics and appendiceal pathology between early (2006–2011) and late study phases (2012–2017).

Results

The mean age of patients with pathologically proven AA (n = 761) was significantly greater in the late phase than in the early phase (38.6 ± 19.8 years vs. 44.0 ± 20.3 years, p = 0.0002), and the ratio of patients with AA aged ≧ 75 years was also increased (from 5.6 to 8.6%, p = 0.1120). The incidences of complicated appendicitis (defined as perforated or gangrenous appendicitis) and appendiceal diverticulitis (AD) were increased in the late phase compared to those in the early phase (61.3% vs. 77.2% and 3.7% vs. 6.6%, respectively). The negative appendectomy rate was significantly reduced in the late phase compared to that in the early phase (10.0% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

During a 12-year period, the mean age of patients with AA and the incidences of complicated appendicitis and AD increased, whereas the negative appendectomy rate decreased.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925CrossRef Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:1937–43. Flum DR. Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:1937–43.
3.
go back to reference Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H et al (2018) Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 320:1259–1265CrossRef Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H et al (2018) Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 320:1259–1265CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bergeron E, Richer B, Gharib R et al (1999) Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement. Am J Surg 177:460–462CrossRef Bergeron E, Richer B, Gharib R et al (1999) Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement. Am J Surg 177:460–462CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Soyer P, Dohan A, Eveno C et al (2013) Pitfalls and mimickers at 64-section helical CT that cause negative appendectomy: an analysis from 1057 appendectomies. Clin Imaging 37:895–901CrossRef Soyer P, Dohan A, Eveno C et al (2013) Pitfalls and mimickers at 64-section helical CT that cause negative appendectomy: an analysis from 1057 appendectomies. Clin Imaging 37:895–901CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim MS, Kwon HJ, Kang KA et al (2018) Diagnostic performance and useful findings of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT features of acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol 91:20170529PubMedPubMedCentral Kim MS, Kwon HJ, Kang KA et al (2018) Diagnostic performance and useful findings of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT features of acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol 91:20170529PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Yamashita H, Yuasa N, Takeuchi E et al (2016) Diagnostic value of procalcitonin for acute complicated appendicitis. Nagoya J Med Sci 78:79–88PubMedPubMedCentral Yamashita H, Yuasa N, Takeuchi E et al (2016) Diagnostic value of procalcitonin for acute complicated appendicitis. Nagoya J Med Sci 78:79–88PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Boonstra PA, van Veen RN, Stockmann HB (2015) Less negative appendectomies due to imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 29:2365–2370CrossRef Boonstra PA, van Veen RN, Stockmann HB (2015) Less negative appendectomies due to imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 29:2365–2370CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579CrossRef Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T et al (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348CrossRef Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T et al (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, Sibilio A, Giorgini E et al (2014) The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 260:109–117CrossRef Di Saverio S, Sibilio A, Giorgini E et al (2014) The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 260:109–117CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chang AY, Skirbekk VF, Tyrovolas S et al (2019) Measuring population ageing: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Public Health 4:e159–e167CrossRef Chang AY, Skirbekk VF, Tyrovolas S et al (2019) Measuring population ageing: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Public Health 4:e159–e167CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D (1990) A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 160:291–293CrossRef Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D (1990) A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 160:291–293CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smithy WB, Wexner SD, Daily TH (1986) The diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis in the aged. Dis Colon Rectum 29:170–173CrossRef Smithy WB, Wexner SD, Daily TH (1986) The diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis in the aged. Dis Colon Rectum 29:170–173CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What we have learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201CrossRef Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What we have learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465CrossRef Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kutasy B, Hunziker M, Laxamanadass G et al (2010) Increased incidence of negative appendectomy in childhood obesity. Pediatr Surg Int 26:959–962CrossRef Kutasy B, Hunziker M, Laxamanadass G et al (2010) Increased incidence of negative appendectomy in childhood obesity. Pediatr Surg Int 26:959–962CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oyetunji TA, Ong'uti SK, Bolorunduro OB et al (2012) Pediatric negative appendectomy rate: trend, predictors, and differentials. J Surg Res 173:16–20CrossRef Oyetunji TA, Ong'uti SK, Bolorunduro OB et al (2012) Pediatric negative appendectomy rate: trend, predictors, and differentials. J Surg Res 173:16–20CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yamada I, Kawamoto S, Inada K et al (2012) Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of appendiceal diverticulitis: a comparison with 378 cases of acute appendicitis. Surg Today 42:363–367CrossRef Yamada I, Kawamoto S, Inada K et al (2012) Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of appendiceal diverticulitis: a comparison with 378 cases of acute appendicitis. Surg Today 42:363–367CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee KH, Lee HS, Park SH et al (2007) Diagnosis and differntiation from usual acute appendicitis using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:763–769CrossRef Lee KH, Lee HS, Park SH et al (2007) Diagnosis and differntiation from usual acute appendicitis using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:763–769CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kubota T, Omori T, Yamamoto J et al (2006) Sonographic findings of acute appendiceal diverticulitis. World J Gastroenterol 12:4104–4105CrossRef Kubota T, Omori T, Yamamoto J et al (2006) Sonographic findings of acute appendiceal diverticulitis. World J Gastroenterol 12:4104–4105CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nemeth L, Reen DJ, O'Briain DS et al (2001) Evidence of an inflammatory pathologic condition in "normal" appendices following emergency appendectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:759–764PubMed Nemeth L, Reen DJ, O'Briain DS et al (2001) Evidence of an inflammatory pathologic condition in "normal" appendices following emergency appendectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:759–764PubMed
23.
go back to reference Roberts JK, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J (2008) Macroscopic findings at appendicectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 16:386–390CrossRef Roberts JK, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J (2008) Macroscopic findings at appendicectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 16:386–390CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, et al. What is positive appendicitis? A new answer to an old question. Clinical, macroscopical and microscopical findings in 200 consecutive appendectomies. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50:1145–9. Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, et al. What is positive appendicitis? A new answer to an old question. Clinical, macroscopical and microscopical findings in 200 consecutive appendectomies. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50:1145–9.
25.
go back to reference Carr NJ (2000) The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol 4:46–58CrossRef Carr NJ (2000) The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol 4:46–58CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rosai J (2011) Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, 10th edn. Mosby, Saint Louis, pp 714–716 Rosai J (2011) Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, 10th edn. Mosby, Saint Louis, pp 714–716
27.
go back to reference Hattori T, Yuasa N, Ikegami S, et al (2019) Culture-based bacterial evaluation of the appendix lumen in patients with and without acute appendicitis. J Infect Chemother 25:708–713CrossRef Hattori T, Yuasa N, Ikegami S, et al (2019) Culture-based bacterial evaluation of the appendix lumen in patients with and without acute appendicitis. J Infect Chemother 25:708–713CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ishiyama M, Yanase F, Taketa T et al (2013) Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 20:125–130CrossRef Ishiyama M, Yanase F, Taketa T et al (2013) Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 20:125–130CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC et al (2011) Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg 201:433–437CrossRef Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC et al (2011) Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg 201:433–437CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Mock K, Lu Y, Friedlander S et al (2016) Misdiagnosing adult appendicitis: clinical, cost, and socioeconomic implications of negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 212:1076–1082CrossRef Mock K, Lu Y, Friedlander S et al (2016) Misdiagnosing adult appendicitis: clinical, cost, and socioeconomic implications of negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 212:1076–1082CrossRef
31.
go back to reference van Dijk ST, van Dijk AH, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2018) Meta-analysis of in-hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 105:933–945CrossRef van Dijk ST, van Dijk AH, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2018) Meta-analysis of in-hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 105:933–945CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chronological Changes in Appendiceal Pathology Among Patients Who Underwent Appendectomy for Suspected Acute Appendicitis
Authors
Kota Sugiura
Hideo Miyake
Hidemasa Nagai
Yuichiro Yoshioka
Koji Shibata
Soichiro Asai
Norihiro Yuasa
Masahiko Fujino
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05509-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

World Journal of Surgery 9/2020 Go to the issue