Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Wound Infection | Original Scientific Report

Perioperative Outcomes of Melanoma Patients Undergoing Surgery After Receiving Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy

Authors: James Sun, Dennis A. Kirichenko, Joyce L. Chung, Michael J. Carr, Zeynep Eroglu, Nikhil I. Khushalani, Joseph Markowitz, Jane L. Messina, Vernon K. Sondak, Jonathan S. Zager, Sephalie Y. Patel

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Traditional chemotherapy agents adversely affect wound healing and need to be held prior to or after surgery. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted agents are now standard of care for the several treatment cancers. We hypothesize that ICI and targeted therapy do not have similar adverse effects on perioperative outcomes.

Methods

We performed a review of melanoma patients undergoing surgery at an academic hospital between 2011 and 2019. All patients received ICI or targeted therapy ≤ 60 days prior to surgery, including palliative procedures. Preoperative performance status was assessed using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification System. Thirty-day complications were classified by Clavien–Dindo grade. No statistical comparisons were performed.

Results

Of 63 patients included in the analysis, 29 (46%) patients received ICI and 34 (54%) received targeted therapy with median of 14 days (IQR 5–27 days) between the last preoperative dose and day of surgery (ICI, median 18 days [IQR 13–34.5]; targeted therapy, median 7 days [IQR 3–22.25]). There were no perioperative mortalities. Among patients treated with ICI, 22 patients (76%) had no complications. Four patients had wound infections (2 readmitted), 1 had reoperation (hematoma) and 2 readmitted for other reasons (fever; volvulus). Among patients treated with targeted therapy, 25 patients (74%) had no complications. Seven patients had wound infections (none readmitted), 1 had reoperation (flap failure) and 1 had dehiscence (not treated).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing treatment with ICI or targeted therapies can safely undergo surgery without substantially increased risk of serious intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C et al (2015) Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from Phase II and Phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 33:1889–1894CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C et al (2015) Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from Phase II and Phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 33:1889–1894CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hao C, Tian J, Liu H et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7325CrossRef Hao C, Tian J, Liu H et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7325CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Ott PA, Hodi FS, Robert C (2013) CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: new immunotherapeutic modalities with durable clinical benefit in melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 19:5300–5309CrossRefPubMed Ott PA, Hodi FS, Robert C (2013) CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: new immunotherapeutic modalities with durable clinical benefit in melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 19:5300–5309CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Chambers CA et al (2009) Blockade of CTLA-4 on both effector and regulatory T cell compartments contributes to the antitumor activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. J Exp Med 206:1717–1725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Chambers CA et al (2009) Blockade of CTLA-4 on both effector and regulatory T cell compartments contributes to the antitumor activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. J Exp Med 206:1717–1725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM et al (2011) Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 29:1239–1246CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM et al (2011) Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 29:1239–1246CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wellbrock C, Hurlstone A (2010) BRAF as therapeutic target in melanoma. Biochem Pharmacol 80:561–567CrossRefPubMed Wellbrock C, Hurlstone A (2010) BRAF as therapeutic target in melanoma. Biochem Pharmacol 80:561–567CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Eroglu Z, Ribas A (2016) Combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors for melanoma: latest evidence and place in therapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 8:48–56CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eroglu Z, Ribas A (2016) Combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors for melanoma: latest evidence and place in therapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 8:48–56CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Keung EZ, Wargo JA (2019) The current landscape of immune checkpoint inhibition for solid malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 28:369–386CrossRefPubMed Keung EZ, Wargo JA (2019) The current landscape of immune checkpoint inhibition for solid malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 28:369–386CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Huijberts S, Grothey A et al (2019) Binimetinib, encorafenib, and cetuximab triplet therapy for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: safety lead-in results from the Phase III BEACON colorectal cancer study. J Clin Oncol 37:1460–1469CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Cutsem E, Huijberts S, Grothey A et al (2019) Binimetinib, encorafenib, and cetuximab triplet therapy for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: safety lead-in results from the Phase III BEACON colorectal cancer study. J Clin Oncol 37:1460–1469CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Seebacher NA, Stacy AE, Porter GM, Merlot AM (2019) Clinical development of targeted and immune based anti-cancer therapies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38:156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seebacher NA, Stacy AE, Porter GM, Merlot AM (2019) Clinical development of targeted and immune based anti-cancer therapies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38:156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Coit DG, Thompson JA, Albertini MR et al (2019) Cutaneous Melanoma, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(4):367–402CrossRefPubMed Coit DG, Thompson JA, Albertini MR et al (2019) Cutaneous Melanoma, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(4):367–402CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dummer R, Garbe C, Thompson JA et al (2006) Randomized dose-escalation study evaluating peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 24:1188–1194CrossRefPubMed Dummer R, Garbe C, Thompson JA et al (2006) Randomized dose-escalation study evaluating peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 24:1188–1194CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hauschild A, Gogas H, Tarhini A et al (2008) Practical guidelines for the management of interferon-alpha-2b side effects in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for melanoma: expert opinion. Cancer 112:982–994CrossRefPubMed Hauschild A, Gogas H, Tarhini A et al (2008) Practical guidelines for the management of interferon-alpha-2b side effects in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for melanoma: expert opinion. Cancer 112:982–994CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Middleton MR, Grob JJ, Aaronson N et al (2000) Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 18:158–166CrossRefPubMed Middleton MR, Grob JJ, Aaronson N et al (2000) Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 18:158–166CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Atkins MB, Lotze MT, Dutcher JP et al (1999) High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. J Clin Oncol 17:2105–2116CrossRefPubMed Atkins MB, Lotze MT, Dutcher JP et al (1999) High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. J Clin Oncol 17:2105–2116CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Anforth R, Fernandez-Penas P, Long GV (2013) Cutaneous toxicities of RAF inhibitors. Lancet Oncol 14:e11–18CrossRefPubMed Anforth R, Fernandez-Penas P, Long GV (2013) Cutaneous toxicities of RAF inhibitors. Lancet Oncol 14:e11–18CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Erinjeri JP, Fong AJ, Kemeny NE et al (2011) Timing of administration of bevacizumab chemotherapy affects wound healing after chest wall port placement. Cancer 117:1296–1301CrossRefPubMed Erinjeri JP, Fong AJ, Kemeny NE et al (2011) Timing of administration of bevacizumab chemotherapy affects wound healing after chest wall port placement. Cancer 117:1296–1301CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ihemelandu C, Levine EA, Aklilu M et al (2013) Optimal timing of systemic therapy in resectable colorectal liver metastases. Am Surg 79:414–421PubMedPubMedCentral Ihemelandu C, Levine EA, Aklilu M et al (2013) Optimal timing of systemic therapy in resectable colorectal liver metastases. Am Surg 79:414–421PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Zawacki WJ, Walker TG, DeVasher E et al (2009) Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:624–627 quiz 571 CrossRefPubMed Zawacki WJ, Walker TG, DeVasher E et al (2009) Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:624–627 quiz 571 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Scappaticci FA, Fehrenbacher L, Cartwright T et al (2005) Surgical wound healing complications in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. J Surg Oncol 91:173–180CrossRefPubMed Scappaticci FA, Fehrenbacher L, Cartwright T et al (2005) Surgical wound healing complications in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. J Surg Oncol 91:173–180CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Elias AW, Kasi PM, Stauffer JA et al (2017) The feasibility and safety of surgery in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study. Front Oncol 7:121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elias AW, Kasi PM, Stauffer JA et al (2017) The feasibility and safety of surgery in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study. Front Oncol 7:121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRefPubMed Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference ASA Physical Status Classification System (2014). American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA Physical Status Classification System (2014). American Society of Anesthesiologists
29.
go back to reference Young J, Badgery-Parker T, Dobbins T et al (2015) Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status. J Pain Symptom Manag 49:258–264CrossRef Young J, Badgery-Parker T, Dobbins T et al (2015) Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status. J Pain Symptom Manag 49:258–264CrossRef
30.
31.
go back to reference Hopkins TJ, Raghunathan K, Barbeito A et al (2016) Associations between ASA physical status and postoperative mortality at 48 h: a contemporary dataset analysis compared to a historical cohort. Perioper Med (Lond) 5:29CrossRef Hopkins TJ, Raghunathan K, Barbeito A et al (2016) Associations between ASA physical status and postoperative mortality at 48 h: a contemporary dataset analysis compared to a historical cohort. Perioper Med (Lond) 5:29CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Gyorki DE, Yuan J, Mu Z et al (2013) Immunological insights from patients undergoing surgery on ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3106–3111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gyorki DE, Yuan J, Mu Z et al (2013) Immunological insights from patients undergoing surgery on ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3106–3111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Puza CJ, Bressler ES, Terando AM et al (2019) The emerging role of surgery for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy. J Surg Res 236:209–215CrossRefPubMed Puza CJ, Bressler ES, Terando AM et al (2019) The emerging role of surgery for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy. J Surg Res 236:209–215CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF et al (2005) Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg 242:302–311 discussion 311-303 PubMedPubMedCentral Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF et al (2005) Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg 242:302–311 discussion 311-303 PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Stuiver MM, Westerduin E, ter Meulen S et al (2014) Surgical wound complications after groin dissection in melanoma patients—A historical cohort study and risk factor analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1284–1290CrossRefPubMed Stuiver MM, Westerduin E, ter Meulen S et al (2014) Surgical wound complications after groin dissection in melanoma patients—A historical cohort study and risk factor analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1284–1290CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Glarner CE, Greenblatt DY, Rettammel RJ et al (2013) Wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: is ACS NSQIP adequate? Ann Surg Oncol 20:2049–2055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glarner CE, Greenblatt DY, Rettammel RJ et al (2013) Wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: is ACS NSQIP adequate? Ann Surg Oncol 20:2049–2055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M et al (2006) Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:599–609CrossRefPubMed Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M et al (2006) Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:599–609CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD et al (2007) Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 25:3657–3663CrossRefPubMed Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD et al (2007) Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 25:3657–3663CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Blank CU, Rozeman EA, Fanchi LF et al (2018) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma. Nat Med 24:1655–1661CrossRefPubMed Blank CU, Rozeman EA, Fanchi LF et al (2018) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma. Nat Med 24:1655–1661CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Tarhini A, Lin Y, Lin H et al (2018) Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) and high dose IFN-alpha2b in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: safety, efficacy and impact on T-cell repertoire. J Immunother Cancer 6:112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tarhini A, Lin Y, Lin H et al (2018) Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) and high dose IFN-alpha2b in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: safety, efficacy and impact on T-cell repertoire. J Immunother Cancer 6:112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Rozeman EA, Menzies AM, van Akkooi ACJ et al (2019) Identification of the optimal combination dosing schedule of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OpACIN-neo): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 20:948–960CrossRefPubMed Rozeman EA, Menzies AM, van Akkooi ACJ et al (2019) Identification of the optimal combination dosing schedule of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OpACIN-neo): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 20:948–960CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Sloot S, Zager JS, Kudchadkar RR et al (2016) BRAF inhibition for advanced locoregional BRAF V600E mutant melanoma: a potential neoadjuvant strategy. Melanoma Res 26:83–87CrossRefPubMed Sloot S, Zager JS, Kudchadkar RR et al (2016) BRAF inhibition for advanced locoregional BRAF V600E mutant melanoma: a potential neoadjuvant strategy. Melanoma Res 26:83–87CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Amaria RN, Prieto PA, Tetzlaff MT et al (2018) Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:181–193CrossRefPubMed Amaria RN, Prieto PA, Tetzlaff MT et al (2018) Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:181–193CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Long GV, Saw RPM, Lo S et al (2019) Neoadjuvant dabrafenib combined with trametinib for resectable, stage IIIB-C, BRAF(V600) mutation-positive melanoma (NeoCombi): a single-arm, open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:961–971CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Saw RPM, Lo S et al (2019) Neoadjuvant dabrafenib combined with trametinib for resectable, stage IIIB-C, BRAF(V600) mutation-positive melanoma (NeoCombi): a single-arm, open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:961–971CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Perioperative Outcomes of Melanoma Patients Undergoing Surgery After Receiving Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy
Authors
James Sun
Dennis A. Kirichenko
Joyce L. Chung
Michael J. Carr
Zeynep Eroglu
Nikhil I. Khushalani
Joseph Markowitz
Jane L. Messina
Vernon K. Sondak
Jonathan S. Zager
Sephalie Y. Patel
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05314-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

World Journal of Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue