Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Computed Tomography | Original Scientific Report

The Clinical Implications of Peripancreatic Fluid Collection After Distal Pancreatectomy

Authors: Jun Yoshino, Daisuke Ban, Toshiro Ogura, Kosuke Ogawa, Hiroaki Ono, Yusuke Mitsunori, Atsushi Kudo, Shinji Tanaka, Minoru Tanabe

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy (DP) remains an unsolved problem, and postoperative CT imaging often demonstrates fluid collection (FC) around the pancreatic remnant. This study sought to clarify the clinical implications of FC.

Methods

This study enrolled 146 patients who underwent DP. FC was defined as a cyst-like lesion ≥ 10 mm in diameter on CT imaging at postoperative day (POD) 7. FC size, irregularity of FC margin, and air bubbles in FC were investigated. In addition, clinical data were retrospectively collected, and useful predictive factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were analyzed.

Results

Clinically relevant POPF was observed in 26 patients (17.8%), and FC was detected in 136 patients (94.4%). Multivariate analysis identified FC size and drain amylase levels on POD3 as significant risk factors for POPF. Cutoff values were determined by ROC analyses, and the levels of the FC size and drain amylase on POD3 were determined as 41 mm and 1026 IU/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of FC diameters > 41 mm were 76.9% and 75.0%, respectively, while those of drain amylase levels > 1026 IU on POD3 were 73.1% and 75.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

While treating some FCs after DP was necessary for the management of POPF, others did not require any intervention since most of them spontaneously disappeared. FC size and drain amylase levels on POD3 were found to be significantly associated with POPF and could potentially help to determine appropriate treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Rodriguez JR, Germes SS, Pandharipande PV et al (2006) Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 141:361–365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rodriguez JR, Germes SS, Pandharipande PV et al (2006) Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 141:361–365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A et al (2006) Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 141:1071–1076CrossRefPubMed Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A et al (2006) Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 141:1071–1076CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1691–1697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1691–1697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Chincarini M, Zamboni GA, Pozzi Mucelli R (2018) Major pancreatic resections: normal postoperative findings and complications. Insights Imaging 9:173–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chincarini M, Zamboni GA, Pozzi Mucelli R (2018) Major pancreatic resections: normal postoperative findings and complications. Insights Imaging 9:173–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Scialpi M, Scaglione M, Volterrani L et al (2005) Imaging evaluation of post pancreatic surgery. Eur J Radiol 53:417–424CrossRefPubMed Scialpi M, Scaglione M, Volterrani L et al (2005) Imaging evaluation of post pancreatic surgery. Eur J Radiol 53:417–424CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ma Y, Liu G, Zhang L (2017) CT findings and features of postoperative abdominal infection patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Pak J Med Sci 33:695–698PubMedPubMedCentral Ma Y, Liu G, Zhang L (2017) CT findings and features of postoperative abdominal infection patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Pak J Med Sci 33:695–698PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Tjaden C, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M et al (2016) Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford) 18:35–40CrossRef Tjaden C, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M et al (2016) Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford) 18:35–40CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Uchida Y, Masui T, Sato A et al (2018) Computer tomographic assessment of postoperative peripancreatic collections after distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:349–357CrossRefPubMed Uchida Y, Masui T, Sato A et al (2018) Computer tomographic assessment of postoperative peripancreatic collections after distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:349–357CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chang YR, Kang MJ, Kim H et al (2016) The natural course of pancreatic fistula and fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: is drain insertion needed? Ann Surg Treat Res 91:247–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang YR, Kang MJ, Kim H et al (2016) The natural course of pancreatic fistula and fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: is drain insertion needed? Ann Surg Treat Res 91:247–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Barreto G, D’Souza MA, Shukla PJ et al (2008) The gray zone between postpancreaticoduodenectomy collections and pancreatic fistula. Pancreas 37:422–425CrossRefPubMed Barreto G, D’Souza MA, Shukla PJ et al (2008) The gray zone between postpancreaticoduodenectomy collections and pancreatic fistula. Pancreas 37:422–425CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G et al (2010) Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:207–214CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G et al (2010) Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:207–214CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Yeo CJ (2010) Pancreatic surgery 101: drain, no drain, early drain removal, or late drain removal. What are the data? Where do we go from here? Ann Surg 252:215–216CrossRefPubMed Yeo CJ (2010) Pancreatic surgery 101: drain, no drain, early drain removal, or late drain removal. What are the data? Where do we go from here? Ann Surg 252:215–216CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sierzega M, Kulig P, Kolodziejczyk P et al (2013) Natural history of intra-abdominal fluid collections following pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1406–1413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sierzega M, Kulig P, Kolodziejczyk P et al (2013) Natural history of intra-abdominal fluid collections following pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1406–1413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Allen BC, Barnhart H, Bashir M et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of intra-abdominal fluid collection characterization in the era of multidetector computed tomography. Am Surg 78:185–189PubMed Allen BC, Barnhart H, Bashir M et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of intra-abdominal fluid collection characterization in the era of multidetector computed tomography. Am Surg 78:185–189PubMed
18.
go back to reference Gnannt R, Fischer MA, Baechler T et al (2015) Distinguishing infected from noninfected abdominal fluid collections after surgery: an imaging, clinical, and laboratory-based scoring system. Invest Radiol 50:17–23CrossRefPubMed Gnannt R, Fischer MA, Baechler T et al (2015) Distinguishing infected from noninfected abdominal fluid collections after surgery: an imaging, clinical, and laboratory-based scoring system. Invest Radiol 50:17–23CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:601–608CrossRefPubMed Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:601–608CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cirocchi R, Graziosi L, Sanguinetti A et al (2015) Can the measurement of amylase in drain after distal pancreatectomy predict post-operative pancreatic fistula? Int J Surg 21(Suppl 1):S30–S33CrossRefPubMed Cirocchi R, Graziosi L, Sanguinetti A et al (2015) Can the measurement of amylase in drain after distal pancreatectomy predict post-operative pancreatic fistula? Int J Surg 21(Suppl 1):S30–S33CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Noji T, Nakamura T, Ambo Y et al (2012) Clinically relevant pancreas-related infectious complication after pancreaticoenteral anastomosis could be predicted by the parameters obtained on postoperative day 3. Pancreas 41:916–921CrossRefPubMed Noji T, Nakamura T, Ambo Y et al (2012) Clinically relevant pancreas-related infectious complication after pancreaticoenteral anastomosis could be predicted by the parameters obtained on postoperative day 3. Pancreas 41:916–921CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yan JF, Kuang TT, Ji DY et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 16:573–579CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yan JF, Kuang TT, Ji DY et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 16:573–579CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Vass DG, Hodson J, Isaac J et al (2018) Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20:803–808CrossRef Vass DG, Hodson J, Isaac J et al (2018) Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20:803–808CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Giglio MC, Spalding DR, Giakoustidis A et al (2016) Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection. British J Surg 103:328–336CrossRef Giglio MC, Spalding DR, Giakoustidis A et al (2016) Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection. British J Surg 103:328–336CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yang J, Huang Q, Wang C (2015) Postoperative drain amylase predicts pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 22:38–45CrossRefPubMed Yang J, Huang Q, Wang C (2015) Postoperative drain amylase predicts pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 22:38–45CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Clinical Implications of Peripancreatic Fluid Collection After Distal Pancreatectomy
Authors
Jun Yoshino
Daisuke Ban
Toshiro Ogura
Kosuke Ogawa
Hiroaki Ono
Yusuke Mitsunori
Atsushi Kudo
Shinji Tanaka
Minoru Tanabe
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05009-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

World Journal of Surgery 8/2019 Go to the issue