Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Liver Resection | Original Scientific Report

Short- and Long-term Outcomes after Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignancies: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Authors: Chetana Lim, Chady Salloum, Antonella Tudisco, Claudio Ricci, Michael Osseis, Niccolo Napoli, Eylon Lahat, Ugo Boggi, Daniel Azoulay

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

A laparoscopic approach improves short-term outcomes and maintains long-term outcomes compared to an open approach. In turn, the recent development of robotic surgery raises the question whether it performs as well as laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and robotic liver resection (RLR) for malignancies.

Method

From 2011 to 2017, the study population included 111 patients in the LLR group and 61 in the RLR group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Operative mortality rate was nil. The intraoperative blood transfusion rate was higher during RLR (15% vs. 2%, p = 0.0009). Major morbidity and hospital stay were not different between the two groups. The resection margin width (LLR 7 mm vs. RLR 10 mm, p = 0.13) and R1 resection rates (resection margin width < 1 mm; LLR 15% vs. RLR 11%, p = 0.49) were similar. After PSM (55 patients in each group), the blood transfusion, major morbidity, hospital stay and R1 resection were similar between the two groups. When considering the largest subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma including 114 patients (66%), the 3-year overall survival rate was 80% in the LLR group and 97% in the RLR group (p = 0.10) and remained similar after PSM (p = 0.27). The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 50% in the LLR group and 64% in the RLR group (p = 0.30) and remained similar after PSM (p = 0.26).

Conclusions

No differences were found in blood transfusion, incidence of positive resection margins and long-term outcomes between the two techniques. RLR does not compromise short-term and oncologic outcomes in patients with liver cancers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed
3.
go back to reference Doussot A, Lim C, Lahat E et al (2017) Complications after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma independently shorten survival: a western, single-center audit. Ann Surg Oncol 24(6):1569–1578CrossRefPubMed Doussot A, Lim C, Lahat E et al (2017) Complications after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma independently shorten survival: a western, single-center audit. Ann Surg Oncol 24(6):1569–1578CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kawai T, Goumard C, Jeune F et al (2018) Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis patients allows patients to start adjuvant chemotherapy without delay: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 32(7):3273–3281CrossRefPubMed Kawai T, Goumard C, Jeune F et al (2018) Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis patients allows patients to start adjuvant chemotherapy without delay: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 32(7):3273–3281CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V et al (2017) Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 19(9):818–824CrossRef Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V et al (2017) Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 19(9):818–824CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2010) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348CrossRef Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2010) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme S et al (2012) Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(12):2233–2238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme S et al (2012) Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(12):2233–2238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166CrossRefPubMed Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, Lee PH (2014) Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg 37(2):53–57CrossRefPubMed Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, Lee PH (2014) Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg 37(2):53–57CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045CrossRefPubMed Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRefPubMed Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30(3):1004–1013CrossRefPubMed Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30(3):1004–1013CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lai EC, Tang CN (2016) Long-term survival analysis of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(2):162–166CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Tang CN (2016) Long-term survival analysis of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(2):162–166CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Croner RS, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W, Brunner M (2016) Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(5):707–714CrossRefPubMed Croner RS, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W, Brunner M (2016) Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(5):707–714CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lee KF, Cheung YS, Chong CC et al (2016) Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre. ANZ J Surg 86(3):122–126CrossRefPubMed Lee KF, Cheung YS, Chong CC et al (2016) Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre. ANZ J Surg 86(3):122–126CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim JK, Park JS, Han DH et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver. Surg Endosc 30(11):4756–4764CrossRefPubMed Kim JK, Park JS, Han DH et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver. Surg Endosc 30(11):4756–4764CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Magistri P, Tarantino G, Guidetti C et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first 46 consecutive cases. J Surg Res 217:92–99CrossRefPubMed Magistri P, Tarantino G, Guidetti C et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first 46 consecutive cases. J Surg Res 217:92–99CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Salloum C, Subar D, Memeo R et al (2014) Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases. J Robot Surg 8(2):119–124CrossRefPubMed Salloum C, Subar D, Memeo R et al (2014) Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases. J Robot Surg 8(2):119–124CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lim C, Osseis M, Lahat E et al (2018) Extracorporeal pringle maneuver during laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: detailed technique and first comparison with intracorporeal maneuver. J Am Coll Surg 226(5):e19–e25CrossRefPubMed Lim C, Osseis M, Lahat E et al (2018) Extracorporeal pringle maneuver during laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: detailed technique and first comparison with intracorporeal maneuver. J Am Coll Surg 226(5):e19–e25CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P et al (2016) Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure: a methodological systematic review. Ann Surg 265(5):901–909CrossRef Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P et al (2016) Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure: a methodological systematic review. Ann Surg 265(5):901–909CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gomez-Gavara C, Doussot A, Lim C et al (2017) Impact of intraoperative blood transfusion on short and long term outcomes after curative hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis by the AFC-IHCC study group. HPB (Oxford) 19(5):411–420CrossRef Gomez-Gavara C, Doussot A, Lim C et al (2017) Impact of intraoperative blood transfusion on short and long term outcomes after curative hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis by the AFC-IHCC study group. HPB (Oxford) 19(5):411–420CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lyu X, Qiao W, Li D, Leng Y (2017) Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis after hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8(25):41740–41748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lyu X, Qiao W, Li D, Leng Y (2017) Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis after hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8(25):41740–41748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Postlewait LM, Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA et al (2016) The relationship of blood transfusion with peri-operative and long-term outcomes after major hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study of 456 patients. HPB (Oxford) 18(2):192–199CrossRef Postlewait LM, Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA et al (2016) The relationship of blood transfusion with peri-operative and long-term outcomes after major hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study of 456 patients. HPB (Oxford) 18(2):192–199CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short- and Long-term Outcomes after Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignancies: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
Authors
Chetana Lim
Chady Salloum
Antonella Tudisco
Claudio Ricci
Michael Osseis
Niccolo Napoli
Eylon Lahat
Ugo Boggi
Daniel Azoulay
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04927-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

World Journal of Surgery 6/2019 Go to the issue

Surgical Symposium Contribution

Is Global Pediatric Surgery a Good Investment?