Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Scientific Report

A Comparison of Two Preoperative Frailty Models in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes in Geriatric General Surgical Patients

Authors: Alexandros Andreou, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Maria Venianaki, Sofia Xenaki, Grigorios Chlouverakis, Ioannis Petrakis, Georgios Chalkiadakis

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Frailty in a surgical geriatric population may identify patients at increased risk of complications. However, the optimal method to diagnose it remains to be identified. This study aims to compare two common frailty models and assess their association with postoperative adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing general surgical procedures.

Methods

Prospective study including 298 patients age 65 years or older undergoing elective general surgical operations in a tertiary hospital. Frailty phenotype (FP) was classified using a validated scale which included weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, slowed walking speed and low physical activity. A preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was performed including managing daily activities (ADL), instrumental ADL, cognitive status, comorbidities, polypharmacy and nutritional status. Main outcomes measures were postoperative complications and length of stay.

Results

There were 135 (46%), 114 (38%) and 46 (15%) minor/intermediate, major and major + procedures, respectively. The agreement between the FP and CGA was moderate (kappa index: 0.45). FP was significantly associated with postoperative complications with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.3, (95% confidence interval 1.4–3.8, p < 0.01). The association of CGA with postoperative complications did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in both CGA frailty (p < 0.001) and FP (p = 0.001) groups compared to the fit population. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for ASA and POSSUM category, FP retained its significance as a predictor of postoperative complications (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.03–3.3, p = 0.038).

Conclusions

FP was associated more consistently than CGA with adverse postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing general surgical procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1487–1492CrossRef Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1487–1492CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aubrun F, Gazon M, Schoeffler M, Benyoub K (2012) Evaluation of perioperative risk in elderly patients. Minerva Anestesiol 78:605–618PubMed Aubrun F, Gazon M, Schoeffler M, Benyoub K (2012) Evaluation of perioperative risk in elderly patients. Minerva Anestesiol 78:605–618PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C et al (2004) Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:1310–1317CrossRef Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C et al (2004) Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:1310–1317CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lopez D, Flicker L, Dobson A (2012) Validation of the FRAIL scale in a cohort of older Australian women. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:171–173CrossRef Lopez D, Flicker L, Dobson A (2012) Validation of the FRAIL scale in a cohort of older Australian women. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:171–173CrossRef
5.
go back to reference de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD et al (2011) Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 10:104–114CrossRef de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD et al (2011) Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 10:104–114CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M156CrossRef Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M156CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD et al (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342:1032–1036CrossRef Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD et al (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342:1032–1036CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Cavazzini C et al (2003) The frailty syndrome: a critical issue in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 46:127–137CrossRef Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Cavazzini C et al (2003) The frailty syndrome: a critical issue in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 46:127–137CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360CrossRef Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC (1970) Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 10:20–30CrossRef Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC (1970) Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 10:20–30CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186CrossRef Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mungas D (1991) In-office mental status testing: a practical guide. Geriatrics 46:54–58, 63, 66 Mungas D (1991) In-office mental status testing: a practical guide. Geriatrics 46:54–58, 63, 66
13.
go back to reference Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251CrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stratton RJ, King CL, Stroud MA et al (2006) “Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool” predicts mortality and length of hospital stay in acutely ill elderly. Br J Nutr 95:325–330CrossRef Stratton RJ, King CL, Stroud MA et al (2006) “Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool” predicts mortality and length of hospital stay in acutely ill elderly. Br J Nutr 95:325–330CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB (1997) Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol Aging 12:277–287CrossRef Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB (1997) Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol Aging 12:277–287CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148CrossRef Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR et al (2005) Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol 99:1112–1119CrossRef Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR et al (2005) Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol 99:1112–1119CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Plummer WD (1990) Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11:116–128CrossRef Dupont WD, Plummer WD (1990) Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11:116–128CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Barnett S, Moonesinghe SR (2011) Clinical risk scores to guide perioperative management. Postgrad Med J 87:535–541CrossRef Barnett S, Moonesinghe SR (2011) Clinical risk scores to guide perioperative management. Postgrad Med J 87:535–541CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rosenthal RA, Zenilman ME, Katlic MR (2011) Principles and practice of geriatric surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Rosenthal RA, Zenilman ME, Katlic MR (2011) Principles and practice of geriatric surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rothman MD, Leo-Summers L, Gill TM (2008) Prognostic significance of potential frailty criteria. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:2211–2216CrossRef Rothman MD, Leo-Summers L, Gill TM (2008) Prognostic significance of potential frailty criteria. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:2211–2216CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gordon AL, Evans BJ, Dhesi J (2017) The physician’s role in perioperative management of older patients undergoing surgery. Clin Med 17:357–359.CrossRef Gordon AL, Evans BJ, Dhesi J (2017) The physician’s role in perioperative management of older patients undergoing surgery. Clin Med 17:357–359.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pal SK, Katheria V, Hurria A (2010) Evaluating the older patient with cancer: understanding frailty and the geriatric assessment. CA Cancer J Clin 60:120–132CrossRef Pal SK, Katheria V, Hurria A (2010) Evaluating the older patient with cancer: understanding frailty and the geriatric assessment. CA Cancer J Clin 60:120–132CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Maione P, Perrone F, Gallo C et al (2005) Pretreatment quality of life and functional status assessment significantly predict survival of elderly patients with advanced non—small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a prognostic analysis of the multicenter italian lung cancer in the elderly study. J Clin Oncol 23:6865–6872CrossRef Maione P, Perrone F, Gallo C et al (2005) Pretreatment quality of life and functional status assessment significantly predict survival of elderly patients with advanced non—small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a prognostic analysis of the multicenter italian lung cancer in the elderly study. J Clin Oncol 23:6865–6872CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Freyer G, Geay J-F, Touzet S et al (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 16:1795–1800CrossRef Freyer G, Geay J-F, Touzet S et al (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 16:1795–1800CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lasithiotakis K, Petrakis J, Venianaki M et al (2013) Frailty predicts outcome of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients. Surg Endosc 27:1144–1150CrossRef Lasithiotakis K, Petrakis J, Venianaki M et al (2013) Frailty predicts outcome of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients. Surg Endosc 27:1144–1150CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Feng MA, McMillan DT, Crowell K et al (2015) Geriatric assessment in surgical oncology: a systematic review. J Surg Res 193:265–272CrossRef Feng MA, McMillan DT, Crowell K et al (2015) Geriatric assessment in surgical oncology: a systematic review. J Surg Res 193:265–272CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer L et al (2013) Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties. Am J Surg 206:544–550CrossRef Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer L et al (2013) Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties. Am J Surg 206:544–550CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ et al (2010) Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 210:901–908CrossRef Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ et al (2010) Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 210:901–908CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Houles M et al (2010) The assessment of frailty in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 26:275–286CrossRef Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Houles M et al (2010) The assessment of frailty in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 26:275–286CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhøy MS et al (2010) Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 76:208–217CrossRef Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhøy MS et al (2010) Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 76:208–217CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J et al (2007) Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing 36:190–196CrossRef Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J et al (2007) Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing 36:190–196CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ellis G, Spiers M, Coutts S et al (2012) Preoperative assessment in the elderly: evaluation of a new clinical service. Scott Med J 57:212–216CrossRef Ellis G, Spiers M, Coutts S et al (2012) Preoperative assessment in the elderly: evaluation of a new clinical service. Scott Med J 57:212–216CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comparison of Two Preoperative Frailty Models in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes in Geriatric General Surgical Patients
Authors
Alexandros Andreou
Konstantinos Lasithiotakis
Maria Venianaki
Sofia Xenaki
Grigorios Chlouverakis
Ioannis Petrakis
Georgios Chalkiadakis
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4734-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

World Journal of Surgery 12/2018 Go to the issue