Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Scientific Report

First Do No Harm: Predicting Surgical Morbidity During Humanitarian Medical Missions

Authors: Jonathan H. Berger, Zhengran Jiang, Eamon B. O’Reilly, Matthew S. Christman

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite good intentions, humanitarian surgical missions are unavoidably linked to some degree of complication. We hypothesized that the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC) could estimate the risk of complications of procedures performed during the US Navy’s Pacific Partnership 2015 (PP15) mission.

Methods

Patient information and surgical details recorded during PP15 were entered into the ACS-SRC. Risks of complications for each procedure were calculated. Receiver operating characteristics and Brier scores were calculated to compare the predicted outcomes to the observed complications.

Results

Of the 174 unique procedures performed during PP15 (representing 465 patients), 99 were found in the ACS-SRC (representing 256 patients). Risk calculations for PP15 were: 1.5% risk (IQR 0.9, 2.4) of “serious” complications and 2.0% risk (IQR 1.3, 2.8) of “any” complication. ACS-SRC specific risks were calculated as follows: pneumonia 0.1%, cardiac 0.0%, surgical site infection (SSI) 0.6%, urinary tract infection 0.2%, venous thromboembolism 0.1%, renal failure 0.0%, OR return 0.9%, and death 0.0%. The only specific ACS-SRC complication observed was “OR return” (0.35%) and SSI (0.35%). The observed PP15 rates for “serious” or “any” complications (ACS-SRC definition) were 0.70% (2/285) each. Receiver operating characteristics for ACS-SRC for predicting “serious” or “any” complication were 0.743 (p = 0.118) and 0.654 (p = 0.227), respectively.

Conclusions

Although the ACS-SRC over-predicted risk compared to observed outcomes, it may offer a good starting point for humanitarian surgery risk calculation. Observed outcomes may be limited by loss-to-follow-up bias. Emphasis should be placed on establishing patient follow-up as part of humanitarian surgical mission planning and execution.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bickler SN, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N et al (2015) Global burden of surgical conditions. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A et al (eds) Essential surgery: disease control priorities, vol Volume 1, Third Edition edn. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (c), Washington, DC Bickler SN, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N et al (2015) Global burden of surgical conditions. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A et al (eds) Essential surgery: disease control priorities, vol Volume 1, Third Edition edn. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (c), Washington, DC
4.
go back to reference Debas H, Gosselin R, McCord C et al (2006) Surgery. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR et al (eds) Disease control priorities in developing countries. World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC, pp 1245–1259 Debas H, Gosselin R, McCord C et al (2006) Surgery. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR et al (eds) Disease control priorities in developing countries. World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC, pp 1245–1259
6.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842 e831–833 CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842 e831–833 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kuckelman JP, Barron MR, Blair K et al (2016) The routine use of prosthetic mesh in austere environments: dogma versus data. Am J Surg 211:958–962CrossRef Kuckelman JP, Barron MR, Blair K et al (2016) The routine use of prosthetic mesh in austere environments: dogma versus data. Am J Surg 211:958–962CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mitura K, Koziel S, Pasierbek M (2015) Groin hernia surgery in northern Ghana–humanitarian mission of Polish surgeons in Tamale. Pol Przegl Chir 87:16–21PubMed Mitura K, Koziel S, Pasierbek M (2015) Groin hernia surgery in northern Ghana–humanitarian mission of Polish surgeons in Tamale. Pol Przegl Chir 87:16–21PubMed
12.
go back to reference Liu Y, Cohen ME, Hall BL et al (2016) Evaluation and enhancement of calibration in the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. J Am Coll Surg 223:231–239CrossRef Liu Y, Cohen ME, Hall BL et al (2016) Evaluation and enhancement of calibration in the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. J Am Coll Surg 223:231–239CrossRef
Metadata
Title
First Do No Harm: Predicting Surgical Morbidity During Humanitarian Medical Missions
Authors
Jonathan H. Berger
Zhengran Jiang
Eamon B. O’Reilly
Matthew S. Christman
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4720-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

World Journal of Surgery 12/2018 Go to the issue