Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Scientific Report

Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Authors: Kojiro Eto, Naoya Yoshida, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Junji Kurashige, Satoshi Ida, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Yoshifumi Baba, Yasuo Sakamoto, Yuji Miyamoto, Masayuki Watanabe, Hideo Baba

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recently, a simple and easy complication prediction system, the Surgical Apgar Sore (SAS) calculated by three intraoperative parameters (estimated blood loss, lowest mean arterial pressure, and lowest heart rate), has been proposed for general surgery. This study aimed to determine if the SAS could accurately predict perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Methods

We investigated 399 patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Kumamoto University Hospital between April 2007 and March 2015. Clinical data, including intraoperative parameters, were collected retrospectively. Patients had postoperative morbidities classified as Clavien–Dindo grade III or more. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to elucidate factors that affected the development of complications.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 65.7 years, 357 patients (89.5 %) were male. The frequency of any morbidity was 32.3 %. Univariate analyses showed that the SAS as well as preoperative chemotherapy, volume of bleeding, and reconstruction of organs were associated with morbidities. Multivariate analysis showed that a SAS < 5 was found to be an independent risk factor for morbidities.

Conclusion

The SAS is considered to be useful for predicting the development of postoperative morbidities after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, Maris AK et al (2008) Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1938–1945CrossRefPubMed Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, Maris AK et al (2008) Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1938–1945CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, McCulloch P, Poloniecki JD et al (2004) Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM. Br J Surg 91:288–295CrossRefPubMed Tekkis PP, McCulloch P, Poloniecki JD et al (2004) Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM. Br J Surg 91:288–295CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M et al (2015) An original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 45:346–354CrossRefPubMed Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M et al (2015) An original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 45:346–354CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD et al (2012) Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation. Arch Surg 147:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD et al (2012) Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation. Arch Surg 147:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Goldfaden D, Orringer MB, Appelman HD, Kalish R (1986) Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia. Comparison of results of transhiatal esophagectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91:242–247PubMed Goldfaden D, Orringer MB, Appelman HD, Kalish R (1986) Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia. Comparison of results of transhiatal esophagectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91:242–247PubMed
8.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Watanabe M, Baba Y, Yoshida N et al (2014) Outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy in patients with resectable node-positive esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2838–2844CrossRefPubMed Watanabe M, Baba Y, Yoshida N et al (2014) Outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy in patients with resectable node-positive esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2838–2844CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tachimori Y, Kanamori N, Uemura N et al (2009) Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:49–54CrossRefPubMed Tachimori Y, Kanamori N, Uemura N et al (2009) Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:49–54CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Blank S, Stange A, Sisic L et al (2013) Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:211–220CrossRefPubMed Blank S, Stange A, Sisic L et al (2013) Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:211–220CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360CrossRefPubMed Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr et al (2002) The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg 236:344–353 (discussion 353–344) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr et al (2002) The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg 236:344–353 (discussion 353–344) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1999) Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 29:219–225CrossRefPubMed Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1999) Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 29:219–225CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE et al (2007) An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 204:201–208CrossRefPubMed Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE et al (2007) An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 204:201–208CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Regenbogen SE, Bordeianou L, Hutter MM, Gawande AA (2010) The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery 148:559–566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Regenbogen SE, Bordeianou L, Hutter MM, Gawande AA (2010) The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery 148:559–566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE et al (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16:275–281CrossRefPubMed Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE et al (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16:275–281CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Prasad SM, Ferreria M, Berry AM et al (2009) Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy. J Urol 181:1046–1052 (discussion 1052–1043) CrossRefPubMed Prasad SM, Ferreria M, Berry AM et al (2009) Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy. J Urol 181:1046–1052 (discussion 1052–1043) CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zighelboim I, Kizer N, Taylor NP et al (2010) “Surgical Apgar Score” predicts postoperative complications after cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:370–373CrossRefPubMed Zighelboim I, Kizer N, Taylor NP et al (2010) “Surgical Apgar Score” predicts postoperative complications after cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:370–373CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Miki Y, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y et al (2014) Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by surgical apgar score. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2601–2607CrossRefPubMed Miki Y, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y et al (2014) Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by surgical apgar score. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2601–2607CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW (2010) 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1721–1724CrossRefPubMed Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW (2010) 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1721–1724CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 32:260–267CrossRefPubMed Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 32:260–267CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ives CL, Harrison DK, Stansby GS (2007) Tissue oxygen saturation, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, and its relationship to surgical-site infections. Br J Surg 94:87–91CrossRefPubMed Ives CL, Harrison DK, Stansby GS (2007) Tissue oxygen saturation, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, and its relationship to surgical-site infections. Br J Surg 94:87–91CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN et al (2009) Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 302:1543–1550CrossRefPubMed Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN et al (2009) Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 302:1543–1550CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y et al (2011) Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15:250–259 (discussion 259–261) CrossRefPubMed Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y et al (2011) Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15:250–259 (discussion 259–261) CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zingg U, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2011) Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1460–1468CrossRefPubMed Zingg U, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2011) Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1460–1468CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hsu FM, Lee YC, Lee JM et al (2009) Association of clinical and dosimetric factors with postoperative pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy followed by thoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1669–1677CrossRefPubMed Hsu FM, Lee YC, Lee JM et al (2009) Association of clinical and dosimetric factors with postoperative pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy followed by thoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1669–1677CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Authors
Kojiro Eto
Naoya Yoshida
Masaaki Iwatsuki
Junji Kurashige
Satoshi Ida
Takatsugu Ishimoto
Yoshifumi Baba
Yasuo Sakamoto
Yuji Miyamoto
Masayuki Watanabe
Hideo Baba
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3425-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

World Journal of Surgery 5/2016 Go to the issue