Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Perioperative Risk Assessment for Gastrectomy by Surgical Apgar Score

Authors: Yuichiro Miki, MD, Masanori Tokunaga, MD, Yutaka Tanizawa, MD, Etsuro Bando, MD, Taiichi Kawamura, MD, Masanori Terashima, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recently, a simple and easy complication prediction system, the surgical apgar score (SAS) calculated by three intraoperative parameters (estimated blood loss, lowest mean arterial pressure, and lowest heart rate), has been proposed for general surgery. In this study, we evaluated the predictability of the original SAS (oSAS) for severe complications after gastrectomy. In addition, the predictability of a modified SAS (mSAS) was evaluated, in which the cutoff value for blood loss was slightly modified.

Methods

We investigated 328 patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center in 2010. Clinical data, including intraoperative parameters, were collected retrospectively. Patients with postoperative morbidities classified as Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa or more were defined as having severe complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to elucidate factors that affected the development of severe complications.

Results

Thirty-six patients (11.0 %) had severe complications postoperatively. Univariate analyses showed that the oSAS (p = 0.007) and mSAS (p < 0.001), as well as sex, preoperative chemotherapy, cStage, type of operation, thoracotomy, surgical approach, operation time, and extent of lymph node dissection, were associated with severe complications. Multivariate analysis showed that an mSAS ≤6 was found to be an independent risk factor for severe complication, while an oSAS ≤6 was not.

Conclusions

The oSAS was not found to be a predictive factor for severe complications following gastrectomy in Japanese patients. A slightly modified SAS (i.e. the mSAS) is considered to be a useful predictor for the development of severe complications in elective surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sasako M. Principles of surgical treatment for curable gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23 Suppl):274-5s.CrossRef Sasako M. Principles of surgical treatment for curable gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23 Suppl):274-5s.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215-21.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215-21.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:666-73.PubMedCrossRef Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:666-73.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Imamura H, Kurokawa Y, Kawada J, et al. Influence of bursectomy on operative morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2011;35:625-30.PubMedCrossRef Imamura H, Kurokawa Y, Kawada J, et al. Influence of bursectomy on operative morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2011;35:625-30.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2767-73.PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2767-73.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:644-51.PubMedCrossRef Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:644-51.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355-60.PubMedCrossRef Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355-60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236:344-53;discussion 353-4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236:344-53;discussion 353-4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491-507.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491-507.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M. Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today. 1999;29:219-25.PubMedCrossRef Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M. Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today. 1999;29:219-25.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:201-8.PubMedCrossRef Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:201-8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ziewacz JE, Davis MC, Lau D, El-Sayed AM, Regenbogen SE, Sullivan SE, et al. Validation of the surgical Apgar score in a neurosurgical patient population. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:270-9.PubMedCrossRef Ziewacz JE, Davis MC, Lau D, El-Sayed AM, Regenbogen SE, Sullivan SE, et al. Validation of the surgical Apgar score in a neurosurgical patient population. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:270-9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thorn CC, Chan M, Sinha N, Harrison RA. Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital. World J Surg. 2012;36:1066-1073.PubMedCrossRef Thorn CC, Chan M, Sinha N, Harrison RA. Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital. World J Surg. 2012;36:1066-1073.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Prasad SM, Ferreria M, Berry AM, et al. Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2009;181:1046-52;discussion 1052-3.PubMedCrossRef Prasad SM, Ferreria M, Berry AM, et al. Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2009;181:1046-52;discussion 1052-3.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101-12.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101-12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-96.PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-96.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32:260-7.PubMedCrossRef Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32:260-7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Regenbogen SE, Bordeianou L, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery. 2010;148:559-66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Regenbogen SE, Bordeianou L, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery. 2010;148:559-66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Regenbogen SE, Lancaster RT, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. Does the Surgical Apgar Score measure intraoperative performance? Ann Surg. 2008;248:320-8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Regenbogen SE, Lancaster RT, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. Does the Surgical Apgar Score measure intraoperative performance? Ann Surg. 2008;248:320-8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Reich DL, Bennett-Guerrero E, Bodian CA, Hossain S, Winfree W, Krol M. Intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension are independently associated with adverse outcome in noncardiac surgery of long duration. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:273-7.PubMed Reich DL, Bennett-Guerrero E, Bodian CA, Hossain S, Winfree W, Krol M. Intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension are independently associated with adverse outcome in noncardiac surgery of long duration. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:273-7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:217-22.PubMedCrossRef Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:217-22.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ives CL, Harrison DK, Stansby GS. Tissue oxygen saturation, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, and its relationship to surgical-site infections. Br J Surg. 2007;94:87-91.PubMedCrossRef Ives CL, Harrison DK, Stansby GS. Tissue oxygen saturation, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, and its relationship to surgical-site infections. Br J Surg. 2007;94:87-91.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN, et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2009;302:1543-50.PubMedCrossRef Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN, et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2009;302:1543-50.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y, Rettammel RJ, Winslow E, Cho CS, et al. Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:250-9;discussion 259.PubMedCrossRef Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y, Rettammel RJ, Winslow E, Cho CS, et al. Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:250-9;discussion 259.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439-49.PubMedCrossRef Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439-49.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet. 1995;345:745-8.PubMedCrossRef Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet. 1995;345:745-8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi57-63.PubMedCrossRef Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi57-63.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perioperative Risk Assessment for Gastrectomy by Surgical Apgar Score
Authors
Yuichiro Miki, MD
Masanori Tokunaga, MD
Yutaka Tanizawa, MD
Etsuro Bando, MD
Taiichi Kawamura, MD
Masanori Terashima, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3653-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2014 Go to the issue