Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2014

01-04-2014

Impact of Intraoperative Distractions on Patient Safety: A Prospective Descriptive Study Using Validated Instruments

Authors: Nick Sevdalis, Shabnam Undre, James McDermott, Jasdeep Giddie, Lila Diner, Gillian Smith

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is emerging evidence indicating that distractions in the operating room (OR) are prevalent. Studies have shown a negative impact of distractions, but they have been conducted mostly with residents in simulated environments. We tested the hypothesis that intraoperative distractions are associated with deterioration in patient safety checks in the OR.

Methods

We assessed 24 elective urologic procedures. Blinded trained assessors (two surgeons, one psychologist) used validated instruments to prospectively assess in vivo frequency and severity of distractions (related to communication, phones/pagers, equipment/provisions, OR environment, other hospital departments, or a member of the OR team) and completion of safety-related tasks (related to the patient, equipment, and communication). Descriptive and correlational analyses were conducted.

Results

Mean case duration was 70 min (mean intraoperative time 31 min). A mean of 4.0 communication distractions (range 0–9) and 2.48 other distractions (range 0–5) were recorded per case (distraction rate of one per 10 min). Distractions from external visitors (addressed to the entire team or the surgeon) and distractions due to lack of coordination between hospital departments were most disruptive. Regarding safety checks, patient tasks were completed most often (85–100 %) followed by equipment tasks (75–100 %) and communication tasks (55–90 %). Correlational analyses showed that more frequent/severe communication distractions were linked to lower completion of patient checks intraoperatively (median rho –0.56, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Distractions are prevalent in ORs and in this study were linked to deterioration in intraoperative patient safety checks. Surgeons should be mindful of their tolerance to distractions. Surgical leadership can help control distractions and reduce their potential impact on patient safety and performance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weigl M, Müller A, Vincent C et al (2012) The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors’ workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 21:399–407PubMedCrossRef Weigl M, Müller A, Vincent C et al (2012) The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors’ workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 21:399–407PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Weigl M, Müller A, Zupanc A et al (2009) Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians. BMC Health Serv Res 29:110CrossRef Weigl M, Müller A, Zupanc A et al (2009) Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians. BMC Health Serv Res 29:110CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT (2010) Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 19:304–312PubMedCrossRef Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT (2010) Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 19:304–312PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P (2009) Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inform 78:293–307PubMedCrossRef Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P (2009) Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inform 78:293–307PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent C (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604PubMedCrossRef Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent C (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Pract 13:390–394PubMedCrossRef Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Pract 13:390–394PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Primus CP, Healey AN, Undre S (2007) Distraction in the urology operating theatre. BJU Int 99:493–494PubMedCrossRef Primus CP, Healey AN, Undre S (2007) Distraction in the urology operating theatre. BJU Int 99:493–494PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA et al (2008) A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2171–2177PubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA et al (2008) A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2171–2177PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wiegmann DA, El Bardissi AW, Dearani JA et al (2007) Disruptions in surgical workflow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142:658–665PubMedCrossRef Wiegmann DA, El Bardissi AW, Dearani JA et al (2007) Disruptions in surgical workflow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142:658–665PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goodell KH, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2006) Effects of cognitive distraction on performance on laparoscopic tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:94–98PubMedCrossRef Goodell KH, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2006) Effects of cognitive distraction on performance on laparoscopic tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:94–98PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA et al (2008) Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distractions on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:196–201PubMedCrossRef Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA et al (2008) Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distractions on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:196–201PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Feuerbacher RL, Funk KH, Spight DH et al (2012) Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons. Arch Surg 147:1026–1030PubMedCrossRef Feuerbacher RL, Funk KH, Spight DH et al (2012) Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons. Arch Surg 147:1026–1030PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miscovic D, Rosenthal R, Zingg U et al (2008) Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of music on the virtual reality laparoscopic learning performance of novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:2416–2420CrossRef Miscovic D, Rosenthal R, Zingg U et al (2008) Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of music on the virtual reality laparoscopic learning performance of novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:2416–2420CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Russ S, Arora S, Wharton R et al (2013) Measuring safety and efficiency in the operating room: development and validation of a metric for evaluating task execution in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:472–481PubMedCrossRef Russ S, Arora S, Wharton R et al (2013) Measuring safety and efficiency in the operating room: development and validation of a metric for evaluating task execution in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:472–481PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata S (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata S (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Arora S, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R et al (2010) Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 24:2588–2593PubMedCrossRef Arora S, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R et al (2010) Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 24:2588–2593PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2010) The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147:318–330PubMedCrossRef Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2010) The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147:318–330PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243PubMedCrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Intraoperative Distractions on Patient Safety: A Prospective Descriptive Study Using Validated Instruments
Authors
Nick Sevdalis
Shabnam Undre
James McDermott
Jasdeep Giddie
Lila Diner
Gillian Smith
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

World Journal of Surgery 4/2014 Go to the issue