Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2008

01-08-2008

Annoyances, Disruptions, and Interruptions in Surgery: The Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI)

Authors: Nick Sevdalis, Damien Forrest, Shabnam Undre, Ara Darzi, Charles Vincent

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have investigated disruptions to surgical process via observation. We developed the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) to assess operating room professionals’ self-perceptions of disruptions that affect surgical processes.

Materials

The DiSI assesses individual issues, operating room environment, communication, coordination/situational awareness, patient-related disruptions, team cohesion, and organizational issues. Sixteen surgeons, 26 nurses, and 20 anesthetists/operating departmental practitioners participated. Participants judged for themselves and for their colleagues how often each disruption occurs, its contribution to error, and obstruction of surgical goals.

Results

We combined the team cohesion and organizational disruptions to improve reliability. All participants judged that individual issues, operating room environment, and communication issues affect others more often and more severely than one’s self. Surgeons reported significantly fewer disruptions than nurses or anesthetists.

Conclusion

Although operating room professionals acknowledged disruptions and their impact, they attributed disruptions related to individual performance and attitudes more to their colleagues than to themselves. The cross-professional discrepancy in perceived disruptions (surgeons perceiving fewer than the other two groups) suggests that attempts to improve the surgical environment should always start with thorough assessment of the views of all its users. DiSI is useful in that it differentiates between the frequency and the severity of disruptions. Further research should explore correlations of DiSI-assessed perceptions and other observable measures.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Calland J, Guerlain S, Adams R et al (2002) A systems approach to surgical safety. Surg Endosc 16:1005–1014PubMedCrossRef Calland J, Guerlain S, Adams R et al (2002) A systems approach to surgical safety. Surg Endosc 16:1005–1014PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK et al (2004) Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Ann Surg 239:475–482PubMedCrossRef Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK et al (2004) Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Ann Surg 239:475–482PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278PubMedCrossRef Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK et al (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. Br Med J 327:1032–1037CrossRef Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK et al (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. Br Med J 327:1032–1037CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fried GM, Feldman LS (2008) Objective assessment of technical performance. World J Surg 32:156–160PubMedCrossRef Fried GM, Feldman LS (2008) Objective assessment of technical performance. World J Surg 32:156–160PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons. A review of the literature. Surgery 139:140–149PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons. A review of the literature. Surgery 139:140–149PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 40:1098–1104PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 40:1098–1104PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Saegert S, Winkel GH (1990) Environmental psychology. Ann Rev Psychol 41:441–477CrossRef Saegert S, Winkel GH (1990) Environmental psychology. Ann Rev Psychol 41:441–477CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sundstrom E, Bell PA, Busby PL et al (1996) Environmental psychology 1989–1994. Ann Rev Psychol 47:485–512CrossRef Sundstrom E, Bell PA, Busby PL et al (1996) Environmental psychology 1989–1994. Ann Rev Psychol 47:485–512CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intraoperative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604PubMedCrossRef Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intraoperative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Practice 13:390–394CrossRef Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Practice 13:390–394CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139PubMedCrossRef Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Alvarez G, Coiera E (2005) Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round. Int J Med Inform 74:791–796PubMedCrossRef Alvarez G, Coiera E (2005) Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round. Int J Med Inform 74:791–796PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chisholm CD, Dornfeld AM, Nelson DR, Cordell WH (2001) Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Ann Emerg Med 38:146–151PubMedCrossRef Chisholm CD, Dornfeld AM, Nelson DR, Cordell WH (2001) Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Ann Emerg Med 38:146–151PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Woloshynowych M, Davis R, Brown R, Vincent CA (2007) Communication patterns in a UK emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 50:407–413PubMedCrossRef Woloshynowych M, Davis R, Brown R, Vincent CA (2007) Communication patterns in a UK emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 50:407–413PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brixey JJ, Tang Z, Robinson DJ et al (2008) Interruptions in a level one trauma center: a case study. Int J Med Inform 77:235–241PubMedCrossRef Brixey JJ, Tang Z, Robinson DJ et al (2008) Interruptions in a level one trauma center: a case study. Int J Med Inform 77:235–241PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752PubMedCrossRef Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S et al (2004) Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 13:330–334PubMedCrossRef Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S et al (2004) Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 13:330–334PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lingard L, Garwood S, Poenaru D (2004) Tensions influencing operating room team function: does institutional context make a difference? Med Educ 38:691–699PubMedCrossRef Lingard L, Garwood S, Poenaru D (2004) Tensions influencing operating room team function: does institutional context make a difference? Med Educ 38:691–699PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Undre S, Healey AN, Darzi A et al (2006) Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study. World J Surg 30:1774–1783PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Healey AN, Darzi A et al (2006) Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study. World J Surg 30:1774–1783PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2007) Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: refinement and application to urological surgery. World J Surg 31:1373–1381PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2007) Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: refinement and application to urological surgery. World J Surg 31:1373–1381PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sevdalis N, Davis R, Koutantji M et al (2008) Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. Am J Surg (in press) Sevdalis N, Davis R, Koutantji M et al (2008) Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. Am J Surg (in press)
26.
go back to reference Eby LT, Dobbins GH (1997) Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis. J Organ Behav 18:275–295CrossRef Eby LT, Dobbins GH (1997) Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis. J Organ Behav 18:275–295CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M et al (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191:5–10PubMedCrossRef Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M et al (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191:5–10PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2008) Managing intra-operative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training programme? Am J Surg (in press) Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2008) Managing intra-operative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training programme? Am J Surg (in press)
Metadata
Title
Annoyances, Disruptions, and Interruptions in Surgery: The Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI)
Authors
Nick Sevdalis
Damien Forrest
Shabnam Undre
Ara Darzi
Charles Vincent
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9624-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

World Journal of Surgery 8/2008 Go to the issue