Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2008

01-12-2008

Resection Line Involvement After Gastric Cancer Surgery: Clinical Outcome in Nonsurgically Retreated Patients

Authors: P. Morgagni, D. Garcea, D. Marrelli, G. De Manzoni, G. Natalini, H. Kurihara, A. Marchet, L. Saragoni, E. Scarpi, C. Pedrazzani, A. Di Leo, F. De Santis, V. Panizzo, D. Nitti, F. Roviello

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Resection line infiltration (RLI) after surgical treatment represents an unfavorable prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of 89 patients with resection line involvement who did not undergo reoperation.

Methods

On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer, we present the characteristics and outcome of 89 patients who were submitted to surgical resection for gastric cancer from 1988 to 2001 and did not undergo reoperation because of disease extension or associated pathologies.

Results

RLI was significantly higher in patients with T4 tumors and diffuse histological type. Anastomotic leakages were observed in 4.8% of infiltrated esophageal resection margins, whereas 1.9% of infiltrated duodenal resection lines showed duodenal fistulas. Five-year overall survival of patients with RLI was 29%. Prognosis was not affected by RLI in early forms (100% 5-year survival); however, 5-year survival in T2 and T3 stages was significantly lower with respect to the same stages without residual tumor. The influence of RLI on prognosis was confirmed in N0 as well as in N1 and N2 patients. RLI also was an independent prognostic at multivariate analysis (odds ratio = 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–2.08; P = 0.0144).

Conclusions

RLI significantly affects long-term survival of advanced gastric cancer. The impact on prognosis is independent of lymph node involvement. Patients in good general condition for whom radical surgery is possible should be considered for reoperation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Songun I, Bonekamp JJ, Hermans J et al (1996) Prognostic value of resection line involvement in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A:433–437PubMedCrossRef Songun I, Bonekamp JJ, Hermans J et al (1996) Prognostic value of resection line involvement in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A:433–437PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA et al (1993) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg 80:1418–1420PubMedCrossRef Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA et al (1993) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg 80:1418–1420PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Ueyama T, Yao T et al (1992) Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Findings in 10,000 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy. Cancer 70:1030–1037PubMedCrossRef Nakamura K, Ueyama T, Yao T et al (1992) Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Findings in 10,000 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy. Cancer 70:1030–1037PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D et al (2006) Does resection line involvement affect prognosis in early gastric cancer patients? An Italian multicentric study. World J Surg 30:585–589PubMedCrossRef Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D et al (2006) Does resection line involvement affect prognosis in early gastric cancer patients? An Italian multicentric study. World J Surg 30:585–589PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139:711–713PubMedCrossRef Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139:711–713PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Kanehara, Tokyo, pp 15–16 Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Kanehara, Tokyo, pp 15–16
7.
go back to reference Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49PubMed Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
9.
go back to reference Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P et al (2002) Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 9:894–900PubMedCrossRef Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P et al (2002) Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 9:894–900PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non parametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non parametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170PubMed Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc 34:187–220 Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc 34:187–220
13.
go back to reference Institute Inc SAS (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide version 8.02, vol 1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC Institute Inc SAS (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide version 8.02, vol 1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
14.
go back to reference Tsujitani S, Okuyama T, Orita H et al (1995) Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Hepatogastroenterology 42:873–877PubMed Tsujitani S, Okuyama T, Orita H et al (1995) Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Hepatogastroenterology 42:873–877PubMed
15.
go back to reference Yokota T, Kunii Y, Teshima S et al (1999) Clinicopathologic prognostic features in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal or duodenal invasion. Ups J Med Sci 104:217–230PubMedCrossRef Yokota T, Kunii Y, Teshima S et al (1999) Clinicopathologic prognostic features in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal or duodenal invasion. Ups J Med Sci 104:217–230PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Bufalino R et al (1982) Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 196:685–690PubMedCrossRef Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Bufalino R et al (1982) Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 196:685–690PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kakeji Y, Tsujitani S, Baba H et al (1991) Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma. Cancer 68:380–384PubMedCrossRef Kakeji Y, Tsujitani S, Baba H et al (1991) Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma. Cancer 68:380–384PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Mutou T et al (1997) Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients with cancer infiltration at surgical margin at gastrectomy. Anticancer Res 17:689–694PubMed Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Mutou T et al (1997) Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients with cancer infiltration at surgical margin at gastrectomy. Anticancer Res 17:689–694PubMed
19.
go back to reference Keighley MR, Moore J, Lee JR et al (1981) Perioperative frozen section and cytology to assess proximal invasion in gastro-esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 68:73–74PubMedCrossRef Keighley MR, Moore J, Lee JR et al (1981) Perioperative frozen section and cytology to assess proximal invasion in gastro-esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 68:73–74PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW et al (2000) Significance of a positive oesophageal margin in stomach cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 70:700–703PubMedCrossRef Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW et al (2000) Significance of a positive oesophageal margin in stomach cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 70:700–703PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sano T, Mudan SS (1999) No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margin in node positive gastric cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:283–284PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Mudan SS (1999) No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margin in node positive gastric cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:283–284PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V et al (1999) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:291–293PubMedCrossRef Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V et al (1999) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:291–293PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 3:24–33PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 3:24–33PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nagano H, Ohyama S, Fukunaga T et al (2005) Indications for gastrectomy after incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:149–154PubMedCrossRef Nagano H, Ohyama S, Fukunaga T et al (2005) Indications for gastrectomy after incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:149–154PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G et al (2005) Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicentric study. Ann Surg 241:247–255PubMedCrossRef Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G et al (2005) Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicentric study. Ann Surg 241:247–255PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Roviello F, Marrelli D, de Manzoni G et al (2003) Prospective study of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 90:1113–1119PubMedCrossRef Roviello F, Marrelli D, de Manzoni G et al (2003) Prospective study of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 90:1113–1119PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Saka M, Mudan SS, Katai H et al (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:1–5PubMedCrossRef Saka M, Mudan SS, Katai H et al (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:1–5PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Resection Line Involvement After Gastric Cancer Surgery: Clinical Outcome in Nonsurgically Retreated Patients
Authors
P. Morgagni
D. Garcea
D. Marrelli
G. De Manzoni
G. Natalini
H. Kurihara
A. Marchet
L. Saragoni
E. Scarpi
C. Pedrazzani
A. Di Leo
F. De Santis
V. Panizzo
D. Nitti
F. Roviello
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9747-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

World Journal of Surgery 12/2008 Go to the issue