Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022

25-01-2022 | Breast Augmentation | Editor’s Invited Discussion

Invited Discussion on: Breast Augmentation in Athletic Women—A Retrospective Survey Assessing Pectoral Muscle Function and Implant Aesthetics Post Augmentation

Author: Tim Papadopoulos

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://​www.​springer.​com/​00266. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jurat D, Wenzel D (2021) Breast augmentation in athletic women: a retrospective survey assessing pectoral muscle function and implant aesthetics post augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. In press. Jurat D, Wenzel D (2021) Breast augmentation in athletic women: a retrospective survey assessing pectoral muscle function and implant aesthetics post augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. In press.
2.
go back to reference Hassan E (2006) Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. Internet J Epidemiol 3:339–412 Hassan E (2006) Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. Internet J Epidemiol 3:339–412
3.
go back to reference Hipp L, Bunning M, Munnes S, Sauermann A (2020) Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19. Survey Research Methods 14:109–114 Hipp L, Bunning M, Munnes S, Sauermann A (2020) Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19. Survey Research Methods 14:109–114
4.
go back to reference Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157–161CrossRef Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157–161CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yan T, Tourangeau R (2008) Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times. Appl Cognit Psych 22:51–68CrossRef Yan T, Tourangeau R (2008) Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times. Appl Cognit Psych 22:51–68CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2011) Form stability of the style 410 implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:825–826CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2011) Form stability of the style 410 implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:825–826CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Calobrace MB, Capizzi PJ (2014) The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:6S-11SCrossRef Calobrace MB, Capizzi PJ (2014) The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:6S-11SCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Calobrace MB et al (2017) Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 38:38–48CrossRef Calobrace MB et al (2017) Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 38:38–48CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Derby BM, Codner MA (2015) Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:113–124CrossRef Derby BM, Codner MA (2015) Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:113–124CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Calobrace MB, Kaufman DL, Gordon AE, Reid DL (2014) Evolving practices in augmentation operative technique with sientra HSC round implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:57S-67SCrossRef Calobrace MB, Kaufman DL, Gordon AE, Reid DL (2014) Evolving practices in augmentation operative technique with sientra HSC round implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:57S-67SCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Calobrace MB et al (2018) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:20S-28SCrossRef Calobrace MB et al (2018) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:20S-28SCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hall-Findlay EJ (2011) Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:56–66CrossRef Hall-Findlay EJ (2011) Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:56–66CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Glicksman C, Brown M, Al-Attar A (2012) Late seromas after breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:423–435CrossRef Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Glicksman C, Brown M, Al-Attar A (2012) Late seromas after breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:423–435CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Loch-Wilkinson A et al (2017) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:645–654CrossRef Loch-Wilkinson A et al (2017) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:645–654CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Strasser EJ (2006) Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon’s observations. Aesthet Surg J 26:45–50CrossRef Strasser EJ (2006) Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon’s observations. Aesthet Surg J 26:45–50CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Góes JCS, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: 7 years of experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef Góes JCS, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: 7 years of experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:178–184CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Graf RM et al (2021) Subfascial versus subglandular breast augmentation: a randomized prospective evaluation considering a 5-Year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:760–770PubMed Graf RM et al (2021) Subfascial versus subglandular breast augmentation: a randomized prospective evaluation considering a 5-Year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:760–770PubMed
19.
go back to reference Shi H, Cao C, Li X, Chen L, Li S (2015) A retrospective study of primary breast augmentation: recovery period, complications and patient satisfaction. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:18737–18743PubMedPubMedCentral Shi H, Cao C, Li X, Chen L, Li S (2015) A retrospective study of primary breast augmentation: recovery period, complications and patient satisfaction. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:18737–18743PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH (2013) Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 66:1165–1172CrossRef Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH (2013) Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 66:1165–1172CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stevens WG et al (2013) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1115–1123CrossRef Stevens WG et al (2013) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1115–1123CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schaub TA, Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ (2010) Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: saline versus silicone–a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2140–2149CrossRef Schaub TA, Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ (2010) Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: saline versus silicone–a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2140–2149CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tebbetts JBJ (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRef Tebbetts JBJ (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hidalgo DA, Sinno S (2016) Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1142–1150CrossRef Hidalgo DA, Sinno S (2016) Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1142–1150CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Haładaj R, Wysiadecki G, Clarke E, Polguj M, Topol M (2019) Anatomical variations of the pectoralis major muscle: notes on their impact on pectoral nerve innervation patterns and discussion on their clinical relevance. Biomed Res Int 2019:6212039PubMedPubMedCentral Haładaj R, Wysiadecki G, Clarke E, Polguj M, Topol M (2019) Anatomical variations of the pectoralis major muscle: notes on their impact on pectoral nerve innervation patterns and discussion on their clinical relevance. Biomed Res Int 2019:6212039PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Archives Plastic Surg 42:532–543CrossRef Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Archives Plastic Surg 42:532–543CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Li S et al (2019) Complications following subpectoral versus prepectoral breast augmentation: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:890–898CrossRef Li S et al (2019) Complications following subpectoral versus prepectoral breast augmentation: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:890–898CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hand F, Barry M, Kell MR (2010) A meta-analysis of optimum plane placement and related morbidity in primary breast augmentation. Eur J Plast Surg 33:241–244CrossRef Hand F, Barry M, Kell MR (2010) A meta-analysis of optimum plane placement and related morbidity in primary breast augmentation. Eur J Plast Surg 33:241–244CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Slimani M, Todd D, Chaabene H, Miarka B, Chamari K (2016) Effects of mental imagery on muscular strength in healthy and patient participants: a systematic review. J Sports Sci Med 15:434–450PubMedPubMedCentral Slimani M, Todd D, Chaabene H, Miarka B, Chamari K (2016) Effects of mental imagery on muscular strength in healthy and patient participants: a systematic review. J Sports Sci Med 15:434–450PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Pereira LH, Sterodimas A (2009) Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:752–759CrossRef Pereira LH, Sterodimas A (2009) Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:752–759CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Invited Discussion on: Breast Augmentation in Athletic Women—A Retrospective Survey Assessing Pectoral Muscle Function and Implant Aesthetics Post Augmentation
Author
Tim Papadopoulos
Publication date
25-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02766-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue