Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?

Authors: Shelby Brown, Michael Mirmanesh, Ping Song, Demetrius Coombs, David Rengifo, Lee L. Q. Pu

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although many aesthetic surgeons believe that beveling the angle of an incision improves the aesthetic outcome with regard to scaring, the literature remains scarce largely because few studies have been conducted.

Objective

This systematic review therefore aims to identify whether using a beveled incision adds an aesthetic benefit, to determine whether there is a specific angle that yields a superior outcome, and for the first time, to present a complete discussion of this subject for practicing surgeons.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to search for primary articles. The main inclusion criteria were primary journal articles investigating the use of a beveled angle via a controlled study.

Results

A total of fifty-four publications were reviewed, with only four publications including 124 patients suitable for use in this systematic review. All the studies concluded that the use of a beveled angle incision improved aesthetic outcomes, with the ideal angle ranging from 10° to 45°.

Conclusions

The use of a beveled angle incision can improve scar aesthetics and encourages the regrowth of hair follicles and shafts through the scars via multiple mechanisms. Nevertheless, the paucity of literature available to the practitioner compels further research assessing this important topic.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Camirand A, Doucet J (1997) A comparison between parallel hairline incisions and perpendicular incisions when performing a face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed Camirand A, Doucet J (1997) A comparison between parallel hairline incisions and perpendicular incisions when performing a face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Feinendegen DL (2012) The direct brow-lift using the flat incision technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(2):468–471CrossRef Feinendegen DL (2012) The direct brow-lift using the flat incision technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(2):468–471CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Feinendegen DL et al (2016) Brow reduction, reshaping and suspension by a 20-degree beveled brow incision technique. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 44(8):958–963CrossRef Feinendegen DL et al (2016) Brow reduction, reshaping and suspension by a 20-degree beveled brow incision technique. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 44(8):958–963CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Niamtu J (2008) The subcutaneous brow- and forehead-lift: a face-lift for the forehead and brow. Dermatol Surg 34(10):1350–1362PubMed Niamtu J (2008) The subcutaneous brow- and forehead-lift: a face-lift for the forehead and brow. Dermatol Surg 34(10):1350–1362PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lamme EN et al (2000) Higher numbers of autologous fibroblasts in an artificial dermal substitute improve tissue regeneration and modulate scar tissue formation. J Pathol 190(5):595–603CrossRefPubMed Lamme EN et al (2000) Higher numbers of autologous fibroblasts in an artificial dermal substitute improve tissue regeneration and modulate scar tissue formation. J Pathol 190(5):595–603CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fearmonti R et al (2010) A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 10:354 Fearmonti R et al (2010) A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 10:354
Metadata
Title
Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?
Authors
Shelby Brown
Michael Mirmanesh
Ping Song
Demetrius Coombs
David Rengifo
Lee L. Q. Pu
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue