Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Paper

Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis

Authors: Farid Amirouche, Giovanni F. Solitro, Amit Walia, Mark Gonzalez, Aimee Bobko

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Management of segmental rim defects and bone mineral density (BMD) loss in the elderly prior to total hip replacement is unclear within classification systems for acetabular bone loss. In this study, our objectives were (1) to understand how a reduction in BMD in the elderly affects the oversizing of a press-fit cup for primary fixation and (2) to evaluate whether the location of the segmental defect affected cup fixation.

Methods

A finite element (FE) model was used to simulate and evaluate cup insertion and fixation in the context of segmental rim defects. We focused on the distribution of patients over age 70 and used BMD (estimated from CT) as a proxy for aging’s implications on THR and used probabilistic FE analysis to understand how BMD loss affects oversizing of a press-fit cup.

Results

A cup oversized by 1.10 ± 0.28 mm provides sufficient fixation and lower stresses at the cup-bone interface for elderly patients. Defects in the anterior column and posterior column both required the same mean insertion force for cup seating of 84% (taken as an average of 2 anterior column and 2 posterior column defects) compared to the control configuration, which was 5% greater than the insertion force for a superior rim defect and 12% greater than the insertion force for an inferior rim defect.

Conclusions

A defect along the superior or inferior rim had a minimal effect on cup fixation, while a defect in the columns created cup instability and increased stress at the defect location.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00222 PubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. doi:10.​2106/​jbjs.​f.​00222 PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pierannunzii L, Mambretti A, D’Imporzano M (2011) Trabecular metal cup without augments for acetabular revision in case of extensive bone loss and low bone-prosthesis contact. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 24:133–137CrossRefPubMed Pierannunzii L, Mambretti A, D’Imporzano M (2011) Trabecular metal cup without augments for acetabular revision in case of extensive bone loss and low bone-prosthesis contact. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 24:133–137CrossRefPubMed
5.
7.
go back to reference Cuckler JM (2002) Management strategies for acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:153–156CrossRef Cuckler JM (2002) Management strategies for acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:153–156CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Huber WO, Noble PC (2014) Effect of design on the initial stability of press-fit cups in the presence of acetabular rim defects: experimental evaluation of the effect of adding circumferential fins. Int Orthop 38:725–731. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2187-8 CrossRefPubMed Huber WO, Noble PC (2014) Effect of design on the initial stability of press-fit cups in the presence of acetabular rim defects: experimental evaluation of the effect of adding circumferential fins. Int Orthop 38:725–731. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-013-2187-8 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference D’Imporzano M, Liuni FM, Tarantino U (2011) Acetabular fragility fractures in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 23:71–73PubMed D’Imporzano M, Liuni FM, Tarantino U (2011) Acetabular fragility fractures in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 23:71–73PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gonzalez MH, Amirouche F (2014) Cementless acetabular revision with rim acetabular defects: experimental and FEA investigation. University of Illinois at Chicago Gonzalez MH, Amirouche F (2014) Cementless acetabular revision with rim acetabular defects: experimental and FEA investigation. University of Illinois at Chicago
11.
12.
go back to reference Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, O’Rourke M (2005) Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1620–1630CrossRef Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, O’Rourke M (2005) Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1620–1630CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arden NK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE et al (1999) Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arthritis Rheum 42:1378–1385CrossRefPubMed Arden NK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE et al (1999) Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arthritis Rheum 42:1378–1385CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gonzalez MH, Amirouche F, Solitro GF (2015) Cup stability of decreased radius metal on metal acetabular cups: a finite element analysis. In: Orthop. Res. Soc. Annu. Meet. La Vegas, p 957 Gonzalez MH, Amirouche F, Solitro GF (2015) Cup stability of decreased radius metal on metal acetabular cups: a finite element analysis. In: Orthop. Res. Soc. Annu. Meet. La Vegas, p 957
17.
19.
go back to reference Wodzislawski W, Krupa S, Nowicki J et al (2009) The reaction of the pelvis to the implantation of the acetabular component of the hip endoprosthesis—initial tests with the use of computerized tomography. Acta Bioeng Biomech 11:45–54PubMed Wodzislawski W, Krupa S, Nowicki J et al (2009) The reaction of the pelvis to the implantation of the acetabular component of the hip endoprosthesis—initial tests with the use of computerized tomography. Acta Bioeng Biomech 11:45–54PubMed
20.
go back to reference Gozzard C, Blom A, Taylor A et al (2003) A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplast 18:638–642CrossRef Gozzard C, Blom A, Taylor A et al (2003) A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplast 18:638–642CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Harnroongroj T (1998) The role of the anterior column of the acetabulum on pelvic stability: a biomechanical study. Injury 29:293–296CrossRefPubMed Harnroongroj T (1998) The role of the anterior column of the acetabulum on pelvic stability: a biomechanical study. Injury 29:293–296CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, Morscher EW (2002) Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. J Arthroplast 17:926–935CrossRef Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, Morscher EW (2002) Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. J Arthroplast 17:926–935CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis
Authors
Farid Amirouche
Giovanni F. Solitro
Amit Walia
Mark Gonzalez
Aimee Bobko
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3369-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

International Orthopaedics 8/2017 Go to the issue