Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Paper

Reconstructive surgery of the amputated ring finger

Author: Ricardo Monreal

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Loss of a fourth digit below the level of the proximal phalanx results in a weakened grip, loss of skilled movements, and the amputation stump is repeatedly traumatized. Transposition of an adjacent fifth digital ray can improve hand function and cosmetic appearance by closing the gap created by the missing digit. Digital ray amputation is not a commonly performed procedure. However, when performed correctly it can dramatically improve hand function and cosmesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and aesthetic results of the fifth ray radial translation and intercarpal arthrodesis in mutilating ring finger injuries.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, nine consecutive patients who sustained mutilating ring finger injury were managed by fourth ray amputation with fifth ray transposition between January 2008 and December 2014. There were six males and three females with a mean age of 30.2 ± 12.2 years (age range, 16–56 years) at the time of surgery who underwent delayed fourth ray amputation with fifth ray transposition (after 14 days of injury). Eight cases had undergone previous surgical interventions: three ORIF using intramedullary K-wire fixation, one failed reimplantation, four debridement and application of split thickness skin graft. Primary skin closure of the amputated finger was not considered as previous surgery (one patient).

Results

All patients were followed up for a mean period of 17.1 ± 4.1 months (range, 12–24 months). Grip strength and RAS score improved after fourth ray resection. The postoperative grip strength and RAS (score) were not compromised by the associated hand dominance.

Conclusion

The following conclusions can be made despite the fact that this was a limited study as well as a retrospective analysis: 1-In technical terms, resection of the fourth ray with transposition of the small finger with a wedge-shaped hamate-capitate arthrodesis secured by screw fixation is easier than metacarpal osteotomy/transposition and less liable to post-operative complications. 2-The results of this study suggest that fourth ray resection and transposition of the small finger with a hamate-capitate arthrodesis restores hand function and cosmetics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chang D-H, Ye S-Y, Chien L-C, Ma H (2015) Epidemiology of digital amputation and replantation in Taiwan: a population-based study. J Chin Med Assoc 78:597–602CrossRefPubMed Chang D-H, Ye S-Y, Chien L-C, Ma H (2015) Epidemiology of digital amputation and replantation in Taiwan: a population-based study. J Chin Med Assoc 78:597–602CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC (2012) The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. HAND 7:18–22CrossRefPubMed Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC (2012) The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. HAND 7:18–22CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Le Viet D (1988) Transposition of the fifth digital ray by intracarpal osteotomy. In: Tubiana R (ed) The hand, vol III. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1071–81 Le Viet D (1988) Transposition of the fifth digital ray by intracarpal osteotomy. In: Tubiana R (ed) The hand, vol III. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1071–81
4.
go back to reference Bunnell S (1944) Surgery of the hand. Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 478 Bunnell S (1944) Surgery of the hand. Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 478
5.
go back to reference Fess EE, Moran CA (1981). Clinical assessment recommendations booklet. American Society of Hand Therapists, Garner, NC Fess EE, Moran CA (1981). Clinical assessment recommendations booklet. American Society of Hand Therapists, Garner, NC
7.
go back to reference Colen L, Bunkis J, Gordon L, Walton R (1985) Functional assessment of ray transfer for central digital loss. J Hand Surg 10A:232–7CrossRef Colen L, Bunkis J, Gordon L, Walton R (1985) Functional assessment of ray transfer for central digital loss. J Hand Surg 10A:232–7CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg 38B:902–913 Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg 38B:902–913
9.
go back to reference Long C, Conrad E, Hall A, Furler SL (1970) Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the hand in power grip and precision handling: an electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(2):853–67CrossRefPubMed Long C, Conrad E, Hall A, Furler SL (1970) Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the hand in power grip and precision handling: an electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(2):853–67CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Peimer CA, Wheeler DR, Barrett A, Goldschmidt PG (1999) Hand function following single ray amputation. J Hand Surg 24(6):1245–8CrossRef Peimer CA, Wheeler DR, Barrett A, Goldschmidt PG (1999) Hand function following single ray amputation. J Hand Surg 24(6):1245–8CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Levy HJ (1999) Ring finger ray amputation: a 25 year follow up. Am J Orthop 28(6):359–60PubMed Levy HJ (1999) Ring finger ray amputation: a 25 year follow up. Am J Orthop 28(6):359–60PubMed
12.
go back to reference Carroll RE (1959) Transposition of the index finger to replace the middle finger. Clin Orthop 15:27–34PubMed Carroll RE (1959) Transposition of the index finger to replace the middle finger. Clin Orthop 15:27–34PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pedrazzini A, Calderazzi F, Bertoni N, Ceccarelli F (2008) Cosmetic amputation of the fourth ray as possible outcome of the traumatic amputation of the ring finger injury: a case report. Acta Biomed 79(3):227–32PubMed Pedrazzini A, Calderazzi F, Bertoni N, Ceccarelli F (2008) Cosmetic amputation of the fourth ray as possible outcome of the traumatic amputation of the ring finger injury: a case report. Acta Biomed 79(3):227–32PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nuzumlali E, Orhun E, Ozturk K, Cepel S, Polatkan S (2003) Results of ray resection and ampuation for ring avulsion injuries at the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg 28(6):578–81CrossRef Nuzumlali E, Orhun E, Ozturk K, Cepel S, Polatkan S (2003) Results of ray resection and ampuation for ring avulsion injuries at the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg 28(6):578–81CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Foucher G, Blauvelt R (1997) Indications for reconstruction in finger mutilations. In: Foucher G (ed) Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 121–31 Foucher G, Blauvelt R (1997) Indications for reconstruction in finger mutilations. In: Foucher G (ed) Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 121–31
16.
go back to reference Allende BT, Engelem JC (1980) Tension band arthrodesis in the finger joint. J Hand Surg 5:269–71CrossRef Allende BT, Engelem JC (1980) Tension band arthrodesis in the finger joint. J Hand Surg 5:269–71CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Segmuller G (1977) Surgical stabilization of the skeleton of the hand. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 42–59 Segmuller G (1977) Surgical stabilization of the skeleton of the hand. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 42–59
Metadata
Title
Reconstructive surgery of the amputated ring finger
Author
Ricardo Monreal
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3411-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

International Orthopaedics 8/2017 Go to the issue