Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Paper

A novel technique to preserve range of motion in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Christian Carulli, Marco Villano, Roberto Civinini, Fabrizio Matassi, Lorenzo Nistri, Massimo Innocenti

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Two-stage revision represents the gold standard in the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Different techniques have been proposed, mostly not preserving range of motion. An articulated antibiotic-loaded cement spacer made in association with two unicompartmental implants has been used as an alternative to a static spacer in an effort to retain as much movement as possible between the stages in young, high-demand patients with preserved ROM.

Methods

We evaluated nine consecutive patients with a mean age of 66.5 years. The second stage was performed after lab tests returned to normal and culture proved negative. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years.

Results

Mean ROM from a preoperative value of 105.6° was 103.5° after the first stage, and improved to 110.0° after the definitive implant. Mean Knee Society score was 27.6 preoperatively improving to 86.4 points postoperatively. WOMAC score showed that six patients were very satisfied with the overall result of their reimplanted knee, three subjects were somewhat satisfied. No recurrence of infection, no significant radiolucent lines or osteolysis were recorded at clinical and radiological follow-up and the patients were satisfied with the outcome.

Conclusions

Results indicated that this technique may ensure the advantages of a static spacer, but allow a greater ROM and better functional recovery. It may be considered as a viable option in selected cases even though the higher costs of two unicompartmental implants should be considered in the light of other aspects, such as prolonged hospital stay and rehabilitation in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Insall JN (1986) Infection of total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 35:319–324PubMed Insall JN (1986) Infection of total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 35:319–324PubMed
2.
go back to reference Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1989) Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 20:201–210PubMed Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1989) Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 20:201–210PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rorabeck CH (2002) Session IV: salvage of the infected total knee replacement. Infection: the problem. Clin Orthop 404:113–115PubMedCrossRef Rorabeck CH (2002) Session IV: salvage of the infected total knee replacement. Infection: the problem. Clin Orthop 404:113–115PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS (1990) Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. Risk factors and treatment in sixty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:878–883PubMed Wilson MG, Kelley K, Thornhill TS (1990) Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. Risk factors and treatment in sixty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:878–883PubMed
5.
go back to reference Williams DN, Gustilo RB (1984) The use of preventive antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 190:83–88PubMed Williams DN, Gustilo RB (1984) The use of preventive antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 190:83–88PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fitzgerald RH Jr (1992) Total hip arthroplasty sepsis: prevention and diagnosis. Orthop Clin North Am 23:259–264PubMed Fitzgerald RH Jr (1992) Total hip arthroplasty sepsis: prevention and diagnosis. Orthop Clin North Am 23:259–264PubMed
7.
go back to reference Barrack RL (1996) Economics of the infected total knee replacement. Orthopedics 19:780–782PubMed Barrack RL (1996) Economics of the infected total knee replacement. Orthopedics 19:780–782PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sculco TP (1993) The economic impact of infected total joint arthroplasty. AAOS Instr Course Lect 42:340–351 Sculco TP (1993) The economic impact of infected total joint arthroplasty. AAOS Instr Course Lect 42:340–351
9.
go back to reference Hanssen AD, Rand JA, Osmon DR (1994) Treatment of the infected total knee arthroplasty with insertion of another prosthesis. The effect of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:44–55PubMed Hanssen AD, Rand JA, Osmon DR (1994) Treatment of the infected total knee arthroplasty with insertion of another prosthesis. The effect of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:44–55PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton HJ (1991) Periprosthetic knee sepsis. The role of irrigation and debridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:113–118PubMed Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton HJ (1991) Periprosthetic knee sepsis. The role of irrigation and debridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:113–118PubMed
11.
go back to reference Marsh PK, Cotler JM (1981) Management of an anaerobic infection in a prosthetic knee with long-term antibiotics alone: a case report. Clin Orthop 155:133–135PubMed Marsh PK, Cotler JM (1981) Management of an anaerobic infection in a prosthetic knee with long-term antibiotics alone: a case report. Clin Orthop 155:133–135PubMed
12.
go back to reference Burger RR, Basch T, Hopson CN (1991) Implant salvage in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 273:105–112PubMed Burger RR, Basch T, Hopson CN (1991) Implant salvage in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 273:105–112PubMed
13.
go back to reference Schoifet JD, Morrey BF (1990) Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by debridement with retention of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1383–1390PubMed Schoifet JD, Morrey BF (1990) Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by debridement with retention of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1383–1390PubMed
14.
go back to reference Goksan SB, Freeman MA (1992) One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:78–82PubMed Goksan SB, Freeman MA (1992) One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:78–82PubMed
15.
go back to reference Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P (1990) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement versus two-stage reimplantation. J Arthroplasty 5:35–39PubMedCrossRef Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G, Conaty P (1990) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement versus two-stage reimplantation. J Arthroplasty 5:35–39PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hofmann AA, Kane KR, Tkach TK, Plaster RL, Camargo MP (1995) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. Clin Orthop 321:45–54PubMed Hofmann AA, Kane KR, Tkach TK, Plaster RL, Camargo MP (1995) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. Clin Orthop 321:45–54PubMed
17.
go back to reference McMaster WC (1995) Technique for intraoperative construction of PMMA spacer in total knee revision. Am J Orthop 24:178–180PubMed McMaster WC (1995) Technique for intraoperative construction of PMMA spacer in total knee revision. Am J Orthop 24:178–180PubMed
18.
go back to reference Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP (2003) Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of a PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1888–1892PubMedCrossRef Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP (2003) Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of a PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1888–1892PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Trezies A, Parish E, Dixon P, Cross M (2006) The use of an articulating spacer in the management of infected total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 21:702–704PubMedCrossRef Trezies A, Parish E, Dixon P, Cross M (2006) The use of an articulating spacer in the management of infected total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 21:702–704PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1996) Two stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 331:118–124PubMedCrossRef Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1996) Two stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 331:118–124PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gusso MI, Capone A, Civinini R, Scoccianti G (1995) The spacer block technique in revision of total knee arthroplasty with septic loosening. Chir Organ Mov 80:21–27 Gusso MI, Capone A, Civinini R, Scoccianti G (1995) The spacer block technique in revision of total knee arthroplasty with septic loosening. Chir Organ Mov 80:21–27
22.
go back to reference Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urs WK, Miller DV, Brause BD (1990) Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection: Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:272–278PubMed Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urs WK, Miller DV, Brause BD (1990) Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection: Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:272–278PubMed
23.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB (2000) Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:9–16PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB (2000) Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:9–16PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Emerson RH Jr, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL (2002) Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:132–138PubMedCrossRef Emerson RH Jr, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL (2002) Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:132–138PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1998) Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin N Am 29:205–217CrossRef Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1998) Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin N Am 29:205–217CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ghanem E, Azzam K, Seeley M, Joshi A, Parvizi J (2009) Staged revision for knee arthroplasty infection. What is the role of serologic tests before reimplantation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1699–1705PubMedCrossRef Ghanem E, Azzam K, Seeley M, Joshi A, Parvizi J (2009) Staged revision for knee arthroplasty infection. What is the role of serologic tests before reimplantation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1699–1705PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Zywiel MG, Stroh A, Marker DR, Mont MA (2010) Serological markers can lead to false negative diagnoses of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35:1621–1626PubMedCrossRef Johnson AJ, Zywiel MG, Stroh A, Marker DR, Mont MA (2010) Serological markers can lead to false negative diagnoses of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35:1621–1626PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14PubMed
29.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip of knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip of knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed
30.
go back to reference Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12PubMed Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12PubMed
31.
go back to reference Calton TF, Fehring TK, Griffin WL (1997) Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:148–154PubMedCrossRef Calton TF, Fehring TK, Griffin WL (1997) Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:148–154PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Park SJ, Song EK, Seon JK, Yoon TR, Park GH (2010) Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:1181–1186PubMedCrossRef Park SJ, Song EK, Seon JK, Yoon TR, Park GH (2010) Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:1181–1186PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kendall RW, Duncan CP, Smith JA, Ngui-Yen JH (1996) Persistence of bacteria on antibiotic loaded acrylic depots. Clin Orthop 329:273–280PubMedCrossRef Kendall RW, Duncan CP, Smith JA, Ngui-Yen JH (1996) Persistence of bacteria on antibiotic loaded acrylic depots. Clin Orthop 329:273–280PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kendall RW, Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP (1990) Bacterial growth on antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Arthroplasty 10:817–822CrossRef Kendall RW, Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP (1990) Bacterial growth on antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Arthroplasty 10:817–822CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Sayeed SA, Naziri Q, Khanuja HS, Mont MA (2012) Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:220–227PubMedCrossRef Johnson AJ, Sayeed SA, Naziri Q, Khanuja HS, Mont MA (2012) Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:220–227PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel technique to preserve range of motion in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Christian Carulli
Marco Villano
Roberto Civinini
Fabrizio Matassi
Lorenzo Nistri
Massimo Innocenti
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1880-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

International Orthopaedics 6/2013 Go to the issue