Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 11/2011

01-11-2011 | Original Paper

The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study

Authors: Lei Zhang, Jinyou Zheng, Weiliang Wang, Guangmao Lin, Yijiang Huang, Jin Zheng, Ghamor-Amegavi Edem Prince, Guojing Yang

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of medial support screws for locking plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Methods

Seventy-two consecutive patients underwent prospective treatment for proximal humerus fractures with locking plates between October 2007 and September 2008. Sixty-eight patients accomplished a mean 30.8-month follow-up and were randomized into two groups: 39 patients were treated with only a locking plate and were classified in the –MSS (medial support screw) group, and 29 patients were included in the + MSS group, which were fixed with additional medial support screws. Clinical and radiological investigations were performed in both groups.

Results

The fractures united at an average of 13.6 weeks after final surgery. Comparably better shoulder function recovery was achieved in the +MSS group with regard to the Constant shoulder score (P = 0.01), with the respective excellent and good rates of 79% and 62%. Eleven patients developed various complications. A statistical difference (P = 0.036) was observed regarding the failure rate (23.1% in the −MSS group vs. 3.4% in the +MSS group). The early loss of fixation was related to higher age (P < 0.001) and less initial neck-shaft angle (NSA) (P = 0.011) of the patients. However, bone mineral density was not significantly associated with loss of fixation (P = 0.076). Although no difference was found in all types of the fractures between the +MSS and −MSS groups regarding immediate postoperative NSA, we observed a significantly lower final NSA in the −MSS group and greater secondary angle loss in the subgroup of Neer three-part (P = 0.033 and 0.015, respectively) and four-part fractures (P = 0.043 and 0.027).

Conclusions

Anatomical reduction can substantially decrease the risk of postoperative failure in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures. Medial support for proximal humerus fractures seems to have no benefits in Neer two-part fractures. However, the additional medial support screws inserted into the medio-inferior region of the humeral head may help to enhance mechanical stability in complex fractures and allow for better maintenance of reduction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agudelo J, Schurmann M, Stahel P, Helwig P, Morgan SJ, Zechel W, Bahrs C, Parekh A, Ziran B, Williams A, Smith W (2007) Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):676–681. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815bb09d PubMedCrossRef Agudelo J, Schurmann M, Stahel P, Helwig P, Morgan SJ, Zechel W, Bahrs C, Parekh A, Ziran B, Williams A, Smith W (2007) Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):676–681. doi:10.​1097/​BOT.​0b013e31815bb09d​ PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Warner JJP (2003) Nonprosthetic management of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(8):1578–1593 Iannotti JP, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Warner JJP (2003) Nonprosthetic management of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(8):1578–1593
4.
5.
go back to reference Roderer G, Gebhard F, Krischak G, Wilke HJ, Claes L (2010) Biomechanical in vitro assessment of fixed angle plating using a new concept of locking for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1021-9 Roderer G, Gebhard F, Krischak G, Wilke HJ, Claes L (2010) Biomechanical in vitro assessment of fixed angle plating using a new concept of locking for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-010-1021-9
8.
go back to reference Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089PubMed Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089PubMed
9.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Olsson C, Nordquist A, Petersson CJ (2005) Long-term outcome of a proximal humerus fracture predicted after 1 year: a 13-year prospective population-based follow-up study of 47 patients. Acta Orthop 76(3):397–402PubMed Olsson C, Nordquist A, Petersson CJ (2005) Long-term outcome of a proximal humerus fracture predicted after 1 year: a 13-year prospective population-based follow-up study of 47 patients. Acta Orthop 76(3):397–402PubMed
12.
go back to reference Shahid R, Mushtaq A, Northover J, Maqsood M (2008) Outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated by PHILOS plate internal fixation. Experience of a district general hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 74(5):602–608PubMed Shahid R, Mushtaq A, Northover J, Maqsood M (2008) Outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated by PHILOS plate internal fixation. Experience of a district general hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 74(5):602–608PubMed
14.
16.
go back to reference Friess DM, Attia A (2008) Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison with other fixation techniques. Orthopedics 31(12) Friess DM, Attia A (2008) Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison with other fixation techniques. Orthopedics 31(12)
17.
go back to reference Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, Duda GN (2003) Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(2–3):74–81. doi:10.1007/s00402-002-0465-9 PubMed Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, Duda GN (2003) Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(2–3):74–81. doi:10.​1007/​s00402-002-0465-9 PubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Tingart MJ, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ, Apreleva M (2006) Proximal humeral fractures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(5):620–624. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.007 PubMedCrossRef Tingart MJ, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ, Apreleva M (2006) Proximal humeral fractures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(5):620–624. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2005.​09.​007 PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Clavert P, Zerah M, Krier J, Mille P, Kempf JF, Kahn JL (2006) Finite element analysis of the strain distribution in the humeral head tubercles during abduction: comparison of young and osteoporotic bone. Surg Radiol Anat 28(6):581–587. doi:10.1007/s00276-006-0140-x PubMedCrossRef Clavert P, Zerah M, Krier J, Mille P, Kempf JF, Kahn JL (2006) Finite element analysis of the strain distribution in the humeral head tubercles during abduction: comparison of young and osteoporotic bone. Surg Radiol Anat 28(6):581–587. doi:10.​1007/​s00276-006-0140-x PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study
Authors
Lei Zhang
Jinyou Zheng
Weiliang Wang
Guangmao Lin
Yijiang Huang
Jin Zheng
Ghamor-Amegavi Edem Prince
Guojing Yang
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1227-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

International Orthopaedics 11/2011 Go to the issue