Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Hepatobiliary

Technical success rate of MR elastography in a population without known liver disease

Authors: Howard E. Gill, Christopher J. Lisanti, Ryan B. Schwope, Jason Kim, Matthew Katz, Stephen Harrison

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

MR elastography (MRE) has a low technical failure rate in patients with chronic liver disease. The failure rate in an unscreened population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical failure rate of MRE in patients with no known liver disease.

Methods

In this prospective trial, 633 patients received 673 scans on a 1.5 T MRI using a standard gradient recalled echo MRE protocol. Four MRE images were acquired and repeated as necessary. Two investigators in consensus categorized each failure: 1. Anatomical masking failure; 2. Iron deposition; 3. No waves (connection problem); 4. Poor wave propagation; 5. Poor passive driver placement; 6. Patient breathing problems. Full exam failure was defined as no usable data in all slices. Partial failure was no usable data on at least one slice.

Results

1.0% (7/673) were full failures and 7.0% (47/673) were partial failures per patient. Full failures: iron deposition-71.4% (5/7); no waves-28.6% (2/7). 4.0% (108/2733) slice failure rate: Anatomical masking failure-31.5% (34/108); Iron deposition-25.0% (27/108); No waves-13.0% (14/108); Poor wave propagation-7.4% (8/108); Poor passive driver placement-11.1% (12/108); Patient breathing problems-12.0% (13/108).

Conclusion

The failure rate of 1% is lower than for a screened population. Iron overload was implicated in most full failures. This study demonstrates the high technical success rate of MRE in an unscreened population laying the foundation for MRE as a possible screening tool for the general public.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z, et al (2015) Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Clin Gastroentero Hepatol 13(3):440-451.CrossRef Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z, et al (2015) Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Clin Gastroentero Hepatol 13(3):440-451.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McGee KP (2018) Virtual Palpation: The Role of MR Elastography in Quantifying and Spatially Resolving Tissue Stiffness as a Biomarker of Disease. JACR 15(5):778-780PubMed McGee KP (2018) Virtual Palpation: The Role of MR Elastography in Quantifying and Spatially Resolving Tissue Stiffness as a Biomarker of Disease. JACR 15(5):778-780PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. 2018 The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 67(1):328-357.CrossRef Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. 2018 The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 67(1):328-357.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference O'Shea RS, Dasarathy S, McCullough AJ 2010 Practice Guideline Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 51(1):307-328.PubMed O'Shea RS, Dasarathy S, McCullough AJ 2010 Practice Guideline Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 51(1):307-328.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, et al 2010 Hepatic MR elastography: clinical performance in a series of 1377 consecutive examinations. Radiology 278(1):114-124.CrossRef Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, et al 2010 Hepatic MR elastography: clinical performance in a series of 1377 consecutive examinations. Radiology 278(1):114-124.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hines CD, Bley TA, Lindstrom MJ, Reeder SB 2010 Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness. JMRI 31(3):725-731.CrossRef Hines CD, Bley TA, Lindstrom MJ, Reeder SB 2010 Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness. JMRI 31(3):725-731.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, et al 2015 Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology 276(3):845-861.CrossRef Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, et al 2015 Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology 276(3):845-861.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chen J, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Glaser KJ, Sanderson SO, Ehman RL 2011 Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology 259(3):749-756.CrossRef Chen J, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Glaser KJ, Sanderson SO, Ehman RL 2011 Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology 259(3):749-756.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schuppan D, Ashfaq-Khan M, Yang AT, Kim YO 2018 Liver fibrosis: Direct antifibrotic agents and targeted therapies. Matrix Biology 68:435-451.CrossRef Schuppan D, Ashfaq-Khan M, Yang AT, Kim YO 2018 Liver fibrosis: Direct antifibrotic agents and targeted therapies. Matrix Biology 68:435-451.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Srinivasa Babu A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, et al. (2016) Elastography in chronic liver disease: modalities, techniques, limitations, and future directions. Radiographics 36(7):1987–2006CrossRef Srinivasa Babu A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, et al. (2016) Elastography in chronic liver disease: modalities, techniques, limitations, and future directions. Radiographics 36(7):1987–2006CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tang A, Cloutier G, Szeverenyi NM, Sirlin CB 2015 Ultrasound elastography and MR elastography for assessing liver fibrosis: part 1, principles and techniques. AJR 205(1):22-32.CrossRef Tang A, Cloutier G, Szeverenyi NM, Sirlin CB 2015 Ultrasound elastography and MR elastography for assessing liver fibrosis: part 1, principles and techniques. AJR 205(1):22-32.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mariappan YK, Dzyubak B, Glaser KJ, et al 2016 Application of modified spin-echo–based sequences for hepatic MR elastography: evaluation, comparison with the conventional gradient-echo sequence, and preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 282(2):390-398.CrossRef Mariappan YK, Dzyubak B, Glaser KJ, et al 2016 Application of modified spin-echo–based sequences for hepatic MR elastography: evaluation, comparison with the conventional gradient-echo sequence, and preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 282(2):390-398.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wagner M, Corcuera-Solano I, Lo G, et al 2017 Technical failure of MR elastography examinations of the liver: experience from a large single-center study. Radiology 284(2):401-412.CrossRef Wagner M, Corcuera-Solano I, Lo G, et al 2017 Technical failure of MR elastography examinations of the liver: experience from a large single-center study. Radiology 284(2):401-412.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Agresti A, Coull BA 1998 Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 52(2):119-126. Agresti A, Coull BA 1998 Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 52(2):119-126.
15.
go back to reference Felker ER, Choi KS, Sung K, et al 2018 Liver MR Elastography at 3 T: Agreement Across Pulse Sequences and Effect of Liver R2* on Image Quality. AJR 211(3):588-594.CrossRef Felker ER, Choi KS, Sung K, et al 2018 Liver MR Elastography at 3 T: Agreement Across Pulse Sequences and Effect of Liver R2* on Image Quality. AJR 211(3):588-594.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Serai SD, Dillman JR, Trout AT 2016 Spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography versus gradient-echo MR elastography for assessment of liver stiffness in children and young adults suspected of having liver disease. Radiology 282(3):761-770.CrossRef Serai SD, Dillman JR, Trout AT 2016 Spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography versus gradient-echo MR elastography for assessment of liver stiffness in children and young adults suspected of having liver disease. Radiology 282(3):761-770.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Technical success rate of MR elastography in a population without known liver disease
Authors
Howard E. Gill
Christopher J. Lisanti
Ryan B. Schwope
Jason Kim
Matthew Katz
Stephen Harrison
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02652-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Abdominal Radiology 2/2021 Go to the issue