Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Abdominal Radiology
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2020

01-12-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Special Section: Prostate cancer update

Roundtable: arguments in support of using multi-parametric prostate MRI protocol

Authors: Sirisin Kamsut, Kimberly Reid, Nelly Tan

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

There is increasing evidence to suggest the value of bi-parametric prostate MRI to replace multi-parametric MRI, which includes the dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence. In this review, we discuss the value of DCE in select scenarios, specifically in resolving equivocal cases, improving the diagnostic accuracy in the inexperienced reader, rescuing exams in the settings of failed T2W and DWI, detecting biochemical recurrence, while imposing minimal to no risk to the patient with respect to IV gadolinium use, specifically group II agents.
Literature
1.
Bjurlin, M.A., et al., Update of the Standard Operating Procedure on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer. J Urol, 2019: p. 10.1097JU0000000000000617.
2.
3.
4.
Woo, S., et al., Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018. 211(5): p. W226-W241.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Kang, Z., et al., Abbreviated Biparametric Versus Standard Multiparametric MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2019. 212(2): p. 357-365.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Porter, K.K., et al., Financial implications of biparametric prostate MRI. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2020. 23(1): p. 88-93..CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Afifi, A.H., et al., Multi-parametric MRI and PI-RADS (V1) scoring system: New inception in cancer prostate diagnosis to evaluate diagnostic performance of different score combinations. 2016: The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. p. 1083–1094.
9.
Greer , M.D., et al., Validation of the Dominant Sequence Paradigm and Role of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Imaging in PI-RADS Version 2. 2017, Radiology Society of North America: Radiology.
10.
Taghipour, M., et al., Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019. 44(4): p. 1520-1527.CrossRef
11.
Azadikhah, A., et al., Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) Using Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) for Assessment of Prostate Cancer (PCa) Aggressiveness in Peripheral Zone. 2018.
12.
Zawaideh, J.P., et al., Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostateMRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice. 2020: European Radiology.
13.
Ullrich, T., et al., Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging in Peripheral Lesions in PI-RADS-4 Patients. Rofo, 2019.
14.
Gatti, M., et al., Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI). 2019, Springer US: Abdominal Radiology. p. 1883-1893.
15.
Kitajima, K., et al., Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Using Endorectal Coil MRI at 3 T: Addition of DWI and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement to T2-Weighted MRI. 2015: American Journal of Roentgenology.
16.
Shaish, H., S.S. Taneja, and A.B. Rosenkrantz, Prostate MR Imaging: An Update. Radiol Clin North Am, 2017. 55(2): p. 303-320.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Berman, R.M., et al., DCE MRI of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016. 41(5): p. 844-53.CrossRef
18.
Yu, T., et al., Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Residual or Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Pooled Analysis of 12 Individual Studies. 2015: Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. p. 687–694.
19.
Roy, C., et al., Comparative Sensitivities of Functional MRI Sequences in Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Carcinoma After Radical Prostatectomy or External-Beam Radiotherapy. 2013: American Journal of Roentgen.
20.
Moman, M.R., et al., Focal salvage guided by T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer recurrences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010. 76(3): p. 741-6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Kim, C.K., et al., Prostate MR imaging at 3T using a phased-arrayed coil in predicting locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: preliminary experience. Abdom Imaging, 2010. 35(2): p. 246-52.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kim, C.K., et al., MRI techniques for prediction of local tumor progression after high-intensity focused ultrasonic ablation of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008. 190(5): p. 1180-6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Kalbhen, C.L., et al., Prostate carcinoma: MR imaging findings after cryosurgery. Radiology, 1996. 198(3): p. 807-11.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Roundtable: arguments in support of using multi-parametric prostate MRI protocol
Authors
Sirisin Kamsut
Kimberly Reid
Nelly Tan
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02543-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Abdominal Radiology 12/2020 Go to the issue

Pelvis

Semi-automatic evaluation of baseline whole-body tumor burden as an imaging biomarker of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Pelvis

Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer

Review

Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists

Pelvis

The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy

Special Section: Prostate cancer update

Implementation and design of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging

Review

Therapeutic response assessment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: society of abdominal radiology review paper on the role of morphological and functional imaging techniques

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24 to hear Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits