Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Cholangio Pancreatography | Special Section: Liver Transplantation

Complications of liver transplant

Authors: Elizabeth V. Craig, Matthew T. Heller

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Liver transplantation has become a definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and those meeting Milan criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The morbidity and mortality associated with liver transplantation continues to decrease thanks to refinements in surgical technique, immunosuppression, and imaging. In particular, imaging plays a vital role by facilitating early detection of post-operative complications and enabling prompt treatment. Post-operative complications that lead to graft failure and patient morbidity/mortality can be generally categorized as vascular, biliary, parenchymal, and malignant. Vascular complications include stenosis and thrombosis of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and inferior vena cava; hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm; arteriovenous fistula; and celiac stenosis. Biliary abnormalities include strictures, bile leak, obstruction, recurrent disease, and infection. While imaging is not primarily utilized to diagnose allograft rejection, it plays an important role in excluding mechanical causes of graft dysfunction that can mimic rejection. Ultrasound is routinely performed as the first-line imaging evaluation for the detection and follow-up of early and delayed complications. Cholangiography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are useful in detecting and characterizing biliary complications. Computed tomography is often used to further evaluate abnormal findings on ultrasound or for the characterization of post-operative fluid collections. The aim of this review is to discuss and illustrate the imaging findings of complications associated with liver transplantation and their role in facilitating treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference (2019) United Network for Organ Sharing Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (2019) United Network for Organ Sharing Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network
4.
go back to reference Alexander LF, Little MD, Sanyal R (2015) 092 Liver Transplantation Imaging, 4th Ed. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam Alexander LF, Little MD, Sanyal R (2015) 092 Liver Transplantation Imaging, 4th Ed. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam
5.
go back to reference Mourad MM, Liossis C, Gunson BK, et al (2014) Etiology and Management of Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Adult Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplant 20:713–723.CrossRef Mourad MM, Liossis C, Gunson BK, et al (2014) Etiology and Management of Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Adult Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplant 20:713–723.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Itri JN, Heller MT, Tublin ME (2013) Hepatic transplantation: Postoperative complications. Abdominal Imaging 38: 1300–1333CrossRef Itri JN, Heller MT, Tublin ME (2013) Hepatic transplantation: Postoperative complications. Abdominal Imaging 38: 1300–1333CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sannananja B, Seyal AR, Baheti AD, et al (2018) Tricky Findings in Liver Transplant Imaging: A Review of Pitfalls With Solutions. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 47:179–188CrossRef Sannananja B, Seyal AR, Baheti AD, et al (2018) Tricky Findings in Liver Transplant Imaging: A Review of Pitfalls With Solutions. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 47:179–188CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Starzl TE, Iwatsuki S, Shaw BW, Jr. (1984) A growth factor in fine vascular anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159:164–5PubMedPubMedCentral Starzl TE, Iwatsuki S, Shaw BW, Jr. (1984) A growth factor in fine vascular anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159:164–5PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Cherqui D, Lauzet J, Rotman N, et al (1994) Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the caval and portal flows. Technique and results in 62 cases. Transplantation 58:793–796CrossRef Cherqui D, Lauzet J, Rotman N, et al (1994) Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the caval and portal flows. Technique and results in 62 cases. Transplantation 58:793–796CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sharma S, Gurakar A, Jabbour N (2008) Biliary Strictures Following Liver Transplantation: Past, Present and Preventive Strategies. Liver Transplant 14:759–769.CrossRef Sharma S, Gurakar A, Jabbour N (2008) Biliary Strictures Following Liver Transplantation: Past, Present and Preventive Strategies. Liver Transplant 14:759–769.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Neuberger J, Adams DH (1998) What is the significance of acute liver allograft rejection? J. Hepatol. Neuberger J, Adams DH (1998) What is the significance of acute liver allograft rejection? J. Hepatol.
51.
go back to reference Burton JR, Rosen HR (2006) Diagnosis and Management of Allograft Failure. Clin. Liver Dis.CrossRef Burton JR, Rosen HR (2006) Diagnosis and Management of Allograft Failure. Clin. Liver Dis.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Jain A, Nalesnik M, Reyes J, et al (2002) Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in liver transplantation: A 20-year experience. In: Annals of Surgery Jain A, Nalesnik M, Reyes J, et al (2002) Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in liver transplantation: A 20-year experience. In: Annals of Surgery
57.
go back to reference Caiado AHM, Blasbalg R, Marcelino ASZ, et al (2007) Complications of liver transplantation: Multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics Caiado AHM, Blasbalg R, Marcelino ASZ, et al (2007) Complications of liver transplantation: Multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics
Metadata
Title
Complications of liver transplant
Authors
Elizabeth V. Craig
Matthew T. Heller
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02340-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Abdominal Radiology 1/2021 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The caterpillar sign